Efficiency has emerged as a policy priority across state governments—mirroring the 'year of efficiency' occuring across the private sector. Because most states must balance their budgets and residents can readily move to lower‑tax jurisdictions, leaders across the political spectrum face the same constraints: sustain service quality, avoid tax increases, and demonstrate disciplined stewardship of public funds. Efficiency improvements—eliminating duplication, streamlining processes, and modernizing operations—offer the least‑controversial way to stretch dollars without cutting core services.
Newly introduced bills take oversight functions once centered on fraud, waste, and abuse and expand them to include operational performance and cost effectiveness. Legislatures and governors are also building permanent efficiency structures, strengthening performance management, pruning outdated regulations, and shifting to digital‑first workflows to reduce overhead and accelerate results. The initiatives below show how states are crafting concrete reforms to improve efficiency.
Using the Scholars Edge search engine, I was able to search through all 50 states and the District of Columbia for bills that focused on efficiency. The initial search result consisted of 660 bills, which I pruned down to 195. While the 465 removed bills were largely focused on efficiency of some sort, I was interested in a very specific subset of efficiency bills. I focused on "meta optimizers" as opposed to targetted bills. For example, a meta optimizer would be like the an inspector general, legislative auditor, changing how all regulations are managed, how all contracts and producement is handled, or a commission on efficiency. On the other hand, a bill that aims to streamline the aspects of the state's Department of Education would be a targeted bill. Targeted bills are fairly common- most agencies are designed with accountability and performance reviews in their establishment.
I am interested in legislative bills that focus on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations. This includes measures that establish, restructure, or empower entities such as committees, commissions, task forces, advisory boards, oversight councils, agencies, departments, or special offices whose mission is to identify and implement cost savings, streamline bureaucratic processes, improve inter-agency coordination, or modernize government functions. I am also looking for bills that require or authorize studies, audits, reports, or pilot programs aimed at evaluating government performance, uncovering duplicative or overlapping responsibilities, reducing administrative burdens, or analyzing regulatory inefficiencies. Such initiatives may include the exploration or adoption of automation and technology solutions, consolidation of services, process reengineering, or the elimination of unnecessary rules and procedures. In short, I want to capture bills that propose structural or procedural mechanisms—whether permanent bodies, temporary study groups, or mandated evaluations—that are explicitly designed to make government more efficient, less costly, and more responsive. If it doesn't specifically state that the goal of the legislation is to promote government efficiency, mark it as false.
Legislation ID: 18692
Bill URL: View Bill
SB12 seeks to eliminate unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles in the business licensing process by prohibiting governmental bodies from conditioning the issuance of certain licenses on the acquisition of other licenses from different governmental entities. This aims to facilitate easier access to business operations and reduce regulatory burdens.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-06 | Currently Indefinitely Postponed |
2025-02-11 | County and Municipal Government 1st Amendment |
2025-02-11 | Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar |
2025-02-11 | Reported Out of Committee House of Origin |
2025-02-04 | Pending Committee Action in House of Origin |
2025-02-04 | Read for the first time and referred to the Senate Committee on County and Municipal Government |
Why Relevant: The bill directly addresses the reduction of bureaucratic hurdles and regulatory inefficiencies by eliminating duplicative licensing requirements, which is a clear government efficiency measure.
Mechanism of Influence: By prohibiting conditional licensing, the bill streamlines government processes and reduces administrative burdens, making government operations more efficient and responsive for applicants.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill’s language is clear in its intent to reduce regulatory overlap; however, it does not establish a new entity or require a study, audit, or report. Its mechanism is direct regulatory reform.
Legislation ID: 171230
Bill URL: View Bill
The Alabama Teacher Paperwork Streamlining Act aims to create a unified digital platform to consolidate documentation requirements for various educational programs, including the Alabama Literacy Act and Section 504 Plans. The bill mandates collaboration with local boards of education and stakeholders to eliminate redundant documentation, standardize forms, and develop a data-sharing system to reduce repetitive input by teachers. It also establishes a teacher advisory committee to assess the effectiveness of these measures and ensures compliance by local education boards, with annual audits conducted by the State Department of Education.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-14 | Enacted |
2025-05-06 | Education Policy Engrossed Substitute Offered |
2025-05-06 | Motion to Adopt - Adopted Roll Call 1161 |
2025-05-06 | Enrolled |
2025-05-06 | Delivered to Governor |
2025-05-06 | Signature Requested |
2025-05-06 | Orr Concur In and Adopt - Adopted Roll Call 924 |
2025-05-06 | Ready to Enroll |
Why Relevant: The bill directly aims to improve government efficiency by consolidating and streamlining bureaucratic processes related to teacher paperwork, establishing permanent and advisory bodies, and mandating audits and compliance mechanisms.
Mechanism of Influence: It creates a unified digital documentation platform, standardizes forms, eliminates redundant paperwork, and establishes a teacher advisory committee for ongoing evaluation. It also requires annual audits to ensure compliance and continuous improvement.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Senate Bill No. 107 creates the Alaska Sunset Commission within the executive branch to conduct reviews and audits of state entities. The Commission will assess the necessity of these entities, their operations, and make legislative recommendations. The bill also establishes penalties for obstructing the Commissions work, ensuring accountability and transparency in state operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-17 | (S) NR: WIELECHOWSKI, GRAY-JACKSON |
2025-05-17 | (S) Minutes (SSTA) |
2025-05-17 | (S) AM: KAWASAKI |
2025-05-17 | (S) REFERRED TO FINANCE |
2025-05-17 | (S) STA RPT CS 1AM 1DP 2NR NEW TITLE |
2025-05-17 | (S) DP: BJORKMAN |
2025-05-17 | (S) STATE AFFAIRS at 10:00 AM BELTZ 105 (TSBldg) |
2025-05-17 | (S) FN1: (GOV) |
Why Relevant: The bill directly creates a permanent commission whose explicit mission is to review, audit, and make recommendations regarding the necessity and efficiency of state entities. It is structurally designed to promote government efficiency and accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular reviews and audits, the Commission can identify inefficiencies, redundancies, and opportunities for cost savings or improved operations. Its recommendations could lead to the restructuring, consolidation, or elimination of agencies, as well as process improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's language is clear in establishing the Commission's purpose as related to efficiency and oversight. The scope of 'necessity' and 'operations' could be broad, but the intent is explicit.
Senate Bill No. 37 amends various sections of the Alaska Statutes to improve the management and accountability of state agencies through strategic planning and performance evaluation. It mandates the development of comprehensive strategic plans and mission statements for state entities, requires regular updates and public participation in budget preparation, and emphasizes results-based government by evaluating agency performance against established goals and objectives.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-12 | (S) -- Invited & Public Testimony -- |
2025-05-12 | (S) FINANCE at 09:00 AM SENATE FINANCE 532 |
2025-05-12 | (S) < Above Bill Removed From Agenda > |
2025-04-30 | (S) STA RPT 1AM 1DP 1NR |
2025-04-30 | (S) NR: GRAY-JACKSON |
2025-04-30 | (S) DP: BJORKMAN |
2025-04-30 | (S) AM: KAWASAKI |
2025-04-30 | (S) REFERRED TO FINANCE |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes and empowers structural mechanisms (strategic planning, performance evaluation, reporting) with the stated goal of improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: Requires all executive branch departments and the University of Alaska to develop and regularly update strategic plans and mission statements, submit performance reports, and participate in results-based budgeting and evaluation. Mandates legislative and gubernatorial oversight and public participation.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Senate Bill No. 51 proposes the creation of the Sunrise Review Board within the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development. This board will review proposed legislation related to professional and occupational licensure to ensure that changes are necessary, least-restrictive, and beneficial to the public. The bill outlines the composition of the board, the procedures for requesting reviews, and the criteria for evaluating proposed changes to licensure.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-24 | (S) L&C, FIN |
2025-01-24 | (S) REFERRED TO LABOR & COMMERCE |
2025-01-24 | (S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS |
Why Relevant: The bill creates a permanent board specifically charged with reviewing and evaluating proposed regulatory changes for efficiency and necessity, with an explicit goal of reducing unnecessary regulatory barriers.
Mechanism of Influence: The Sunrise Review Board acts as a structural mechanism to streamline government oversight of professional licensing, aiming to prevent unnecessary or overly restrictive regulations, thereby improving government efficiency and reducing administrative burdens.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent to promote efficiency by recommending only necessary and least-restrictive regulations. The language is clear about the board's mission and procedures.
SB1323 amends section 41-1279.03 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, detailing the Auditor Generals responsibilities, including conducting annual audits of state agencies, performance audits of transportation excise tax expenditures, and evaluating the use of taxpayer money by various governmental entities. The bill emphasizes the importance of compliance with federal and state regulations and mandates regular reporting to the legislature and the governor.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-04 | House2nd Read |
2025-03-03 | House1st Read |
2025-02-11 | Senate Maj Caucus Date |
2025-02-11 | Senate Min Caucus Date |
2025-02-11 | Senate Consent Object Date |
2025-02-10 | Senate Consent Calendar Date |
2025-02-03 | Senate2nd Read |
2025-01-30 | Senate1st Read |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes and empowers the Auditor General to conduct audits, require reports, and ensure compliance, all with the explicit goal of improving government performance and accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating audits, reports, and follow-up on recommendations, the bill creates structural and procedural mechanisms aimed at identifying inefficiencies, reducing waste, and improving the effectiveness of government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 36399
Bill URL: View Bill
This Senate Joint Resolution proposes an amendment to the Arkansas Constitution aimed at improving government efficiency. It outlines the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency, which will be responsible for implementing strategies and policies to streamline government operations and services. The amendment will be submitted to voters for approval in the next general election.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-05 | Sine Die adjournment |
2025-02-05 | Read first time |
2025-02-05 | Filed |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a new department whose explicit mission is to enhance operational efficiency across state agencies.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating a Department of Government Efficiency, the legislation introduces a structural mechanism with a clear mandate to identify and implement cost savings, streamline processes, and modernize government functions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The summary does not specify the exact strategies or powers of the new department, but the purpose is unambiguously stated as government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 24063
Bill URL: View Bill
Assembly Bill No. 24 proposes a constitutional amendment aimed at balancing Californias state budget through various measures. These include cutting and capping total annual labor costs in the state budget, requiring state agencies to competitively source or contract out services, and mandating a two-thirds legislative approval for the state budget and any new program fees.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-23 | In committee: Set, first hearing. Held without recommendation. |
2025-04-09 | Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. |
2025-04-08 | From committee chair, with authors amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended. |
2025-03-25 | Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. |
2025-03-24 | From committee chair, with authors amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended. |
2025-03-24 | Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and TRANS. |
2024-12-03 | From printer. May be heard in committee January 2. |
2024-12-02 | Read first time. To print. |
Why Relevant: The bill directly targets government efficiency and cost savings by mandating labor cost reductions and requiring agencies to seek competitive sourcing for services.
Mechanism of Influence: By capping labor costs and requiring competitive sourcing, the bill would force agencies to find more efficient and potentially less expensive ways to provide services. These structural changes are intended to streamline operations and reduce government expenditures.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill outlines broad strategies (labor cost caps, competitive sourcing), it does not specify the creation of new entities or detailed processes for implementation. However, the requirement for competitive sourcing implies procedural changes within agencies.
Legislation ID: 24073
Bill URL: View Bill
Assembly Bill No. 34 amends Section 39602.5 of the Health and Safety Code to require the Legislative Analyst to analyze the consumer costs associated with any proposed air quality standards, regulations, or rules before the State Air Resources Board can adopt them. This aims to balance environmental regulations with potential economic impacts on consumers.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-17 | Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. |
2025-03-13 | From committee chair, with authors amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended. |
2025-02-03 | Referred to Com. on NAT. RES. |
2024-12-03 | From printer. May be heard in committee January 2. |
2024-12-02 | Read first time. To print. |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes a procedural mechanism (mandatory cost analysis by the Legislative Analyst) that must occur before new regulations are adopted, with the explicit purpose of evaluating and potentially improving the cost-effectiveness of government regulatory actions.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring a formal cost analysis prior to the adoption of new air quality regulations, the bill introduces an additional oversight and evaluation step intended to promote fiscal responsibility and efficient rulemaking. This could help prevent unnecessary or overly burdensome regulations, aligning with the goal of making government more efficient and responsive to economic concerns.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill focuses specifically on cost analysis related to consumer impacts of air quality regulations, rather than a broader government efficiency or structural reform. However, the procedural requirement is explicitly intended to improve the efficiency of regulatory processes.
Legislation ID: 24615
Bill URL: View Bill
Assembly Bill No. 587 seeks to add Article 3.8 to the Education Code, which requests the University of California to reduce its annual administrative costs by at least 10% below the amount spent in the 2025–26 fiscal year, before the 2028–29 fiscal year. This measure aims to ensure more funds are allocated to educational purposes rather than administrative overhead.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-08-25 | From Consent Calendar. |
2025-08-25 | Ordered to third reading. |
2025-08-20 | Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar. |
2025-08-19 | From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar. |
2025-07-15 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
2025-06-18 | From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on M. & V.A. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on M. & V.A. |
2025-06-04 | Referred to Coms. on ED. and M. & V.A. |
2025-05-23 | In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
Why Relevant: The bill directly targets government efficiency by mandating a reduction in administrative costs, which falls squarely within the scope of measures designed to make government operations less costly and more effective.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring the University of California to cut administrative spending, the bill seeks to streamline operations, reduce overhead, and ensure resources are directed toward core educational functions, thereby increasing efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent and mechanism: reduce administrative costs by a specified percentage. It does not specify the exact methods for achieving this reduction, leaving implementation details to the university.
Assembly Bill 733 mandates that each state agency submit an annual list of overdue reports to the Legislature by April 1, including status summaries and compliance plans. This measure is intended to improve legislative oversight and may lead to the withholding of appropriations for agencies that fail to submit timely reports.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-24 | Referred to Com. on G.O. |
2025-02-19 | From printer. May be heard in committee March 21. |
2025-02-18 | Read first time. To print. |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes a procedural mechanism (annual reporting of overdue agency reports) specifically designed to improve government efficiency and accountability through enhanced legislative oversight.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agencies to track and explain overdue reports, and tying compliance to potential budget consequences, the bill incentivizes timely reporting and better agency performance, which can streamline oversight and improve responsiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit about its intent to improve oversight and accountability, which are components of government efficiency. However, it focuses on report submission rather than broader operational reforms, so its impact on overall efficiency may depend on how strictly the Legislature enforces compliance.
This bill modifies the existing procedures for how principal departments in Colorado adopt and review their rules. Key changes include requiring a cost-benefit analysis for each proposed rule or amendment, removing exemptions from this requirement, emphasizing the cost burden of rules during reviews, and mandating that legislative committees vote on department recommendations regarding rule reviews. Additionally, departments must report on revenue generated from fees related to rules.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-10 | House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Postpone Indefinitely |
2025-01-27 | Introduced In House - Assigned to State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes and strengthens procedural mechanisms (cost-benefit analysis, mandatory reviews, reporting, and legislative votes) specifically aimed at improving government efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring cost-benefit analyses, regular reviews with a focus on cost-effectiveness, and transparent reporting, the bill directly targets inefficiencies, unnecessary rules, and administrative burdens. Legislative oversight via committee votes further ensures accountability and responsiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is explicit about the intent to assess cost-effectiveness and reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens, leaving little ambiguity regarding the goal of promoting government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 17103
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill 25-1216 mandates that starting in the fiscal year 2026-27, specific state agencies must implement zero-based budgeting, and by 2027-28, all state agencies are required to do so. The bill outlines the responsibilities of the Office of State Planning and Budgeting to train agencies in this method, submit annual reports on its effectiveness, and ensure public access to budget requests. It also establishes the role of the state auditor in auditing compliance with these requirements.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-28 | House Committee on Appropriations Postpone Indefinitely |
2025-02-11 | Introduced In House - Assigned to Appropriations |
Why Relevant: The bill's explicit goal is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations by requiring agencies to justify all expenses annually, potentially reducing unnecessary spending and increasing transparency.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating zero-based budgeting, the bill restructures the budgeting process to require detailed justification for every expense, which is a procedural mechanism intended to identify cost savings and eliminate inefficiencies. The required audits and reports further institutionalize ongoing evaluation and accountability.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill clearly states its intent and mechanisms for promoting efficiency, with little ambiguity. However, the actual impact will depend on implementation and follow-through by agencies and oversight bodies.
This bill creates the Colorado Government Efficiency Authority, governed by a board of directors composed of private sector representatives and advisory members from state agencies. The authoritys responsibilities include examining state agency operations, identifying efficiencies, collaborating with federal agencies for cost savings, and soliciting public input on government efficiency. The authority is not funded by state agencies and can accept external funding to support its operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-25 | Senate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Postpone Indefinitely |
2025-02-05 | Introduced In Senate - Assigned to State, Veterans, & Military Affairs |
Why Relevant: The bill's explicit purpose is to improve government efficiency by creating a dedicated authority to examine operations, identify efficiencies, and recommend improvements.
Mechanism of Influence: Creates a permanent structural mechanism (the Authority) with the clear mandate to evaluate and enhance government efficiency, including public engagement, intergovernmental collaboration, and resource optimization.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Senate Bill 25-216 proposes to amend Colorado Revised Statutes by repealing the requirement for the Commissioner of Education to annually reprint laws enacted by the General Assembly concerning education. This change is intended to reduce costs associated with printing and distributing these laws, which are to be funded by the state public school fund. The bill also includes an appropriation adjustment reflecting a decrease in funding for these printing costs.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-24 | Governor Signed |
2025-04-16 | Signed by the Speaker of the House |
2025-04-16 | Sent to the Governor |
2025-04-15 | Signed by the President of the Senate |
2025-04-10 | House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments |
2025-04-09 | House Second Reading Special Order - Passed - No Amendments |
2025-04-08 | House Committee on Appropriations Refer Unamended to House Committee of the Whole |
2025-04-03 | Introduced In House - Assigned to Appropriations |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to reduce costs by eliminating an unnecessary bureaucratic process (annual reprinting of education laws), thereby increasing government efficiency and reducing administrative burdens.
Mechanism of Influence: By repealing the annual reprinting requirement and the related funding obligation, the bill streamlines government operations and saves public funds, directly addressing inefficiency in an existing process.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 174621
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 25-306 mandates that the State Auditor conduct performance audits of two specific state divisions: the Air Pollution Control Division during the years 2026 and 2031, and the Division of Unemployment Insurance during 2027 and 2032. These audits are intended to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of these divisions in fulfilling their statutory obligations, ensuring they comply with relevant statutes, and evaluating their processes and resource allocations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-04 | Governor Signed |
2025-05-13 | Signed by the Speaker of the House |
2025-05-13 | Sent to the Governor |
2025-05-13 | Signed by the President of the Senate |
2025-05-06 | House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments |
2025-05-06 | Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass |
2025-05-05 | House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee |
2025-05-03 | House Committee on Finance Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly mandates audits to assess and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government divisions, which aligns directly with the goal of promoting government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring regular performance audits and reports, the bill creates a structural mechanism to identify inefficiencies, evaluate compliance, and recommend improvements, thereby fostering more effective and responsive government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 81514
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill proposes the creation of a task force dedicated to examining how the increased use of artificial intelligence and automation may affect the size and scope of the state workforce. It aims to assess both the practicality and fiscal implications of these technological advancements within state operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-08 | Referred to Joint Committee on Labor and Public Employees |
Why Relevant: The bill creates a task force specifically to examine how AI and automation could affect the efficiency, cost, and structure of state government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By analyzing the fiscal impact and practicality of AI adoption, the task force could recommend measures for streamlining operations, reducing costs, and modernizing government functions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not explicitly state that the goal is to promote government efficiency, but the focus on fiscal impact and operational effects of automation strongly implies this intent. However, if strict language about efficiency is required, this may be borderline.
Legislation ID: 80341
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill mandates that each state agency assess the costs associated with collecting the taxes and fees they administer. The findings will be reported to the finance, revenue, and bonding committee, which will then propose legislation to abolish any tax or fee where the collection costs exceed the revenue generated.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-17 | Referred to Joint Committee on Finance, Revenue and Bonding |
Why Relevant: The bill directly mandates structural and procedural mechanisms (agency cost assessments, committee review, and legislative proposals) intended to improve government efficiency by eliminating financially inefficient taxes and fees.
Mechanism of Influence: It empowers agencies to conduct cost analyses, requires reporting, and compels legislative action to abolish inefficient revenue mechanisms, thereby streamlining government operations and potentially reducing unnecessary administrative burdens.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its goal to eliminate taxes or fees that cost more to collect than they generate, clearly linking its purpose to government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 77726
Bill URL: View Bill
This act reestablishes the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee as a permanent standing committee of the General Assembly, tasked with conducting program reviews and investigations of state departments and agencies. The committee will evaluate the effectiveness of programs, recommend legislative changes, and ensure compliance with audit findings. It also establishes protocols for how the committee operates, including the appointment of members, quorum requirements, and the handling of confidential information.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-29 | Referred by House to Committee on Appropriations |
2025-04-07 | House Calendar Number 337 |
2025-04-07 | Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners Office |
2025-04-07 | Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House |
2025-04-07 | File Number 548 |
2025-03-31 | Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/07/25 12:00 PM |
2025-03-20 | Filed with Legislative Commissioners Office |
2025-03-19 | Joint Favorable |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a permanent legislative committee whose explicit mission is to review, investigate, and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of state government operations and programs.
Mechanism of Influence: The committee is empowered to conduct program reviews and investigations, require audits, recommend legislative changes, and ensure corrective actions are taken. This creates a structural mechanism for ongoing evaluation and improvement of government efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
This bill aims to reestablish the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee, conduct reviews of nonprofit human services providers contracts, streamline reporting requirements, and ensure accountability in state agency contracts with nonresident bidders. It mandates several reports to be submitted to the General Assembly, promoting transparency and efficiency in government operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-29 | Referred by House to Committee on Appropriations |
2025-04-03 | Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners Office |
2025-04-03 | File Number 521 |
2025-04-03 | House Calendar Number 329 |
2025-04-03 | Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House |
2025-03-28 | Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/02/25 5:00 PM |
2025-03-19 | Filed with Legislative Commissioners Office |
2025-03-18 | Joint Favorable Substitute |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes or studies the reestablishment of oversight entities (e.g., Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee) and requires audits and reviews intended to increase government efficiency and accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating audits, studies, reporting, and the creation of uniform policies, the bill directly targets the identification of inefficiencies, duplications, and administrative burdens, and seeks to streamline and modernize government processes.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is explicit in linking the purpose of these mechanisms to government efficiency, transparency, and accountability. There is little ambiguity regarding intent.
Legislation ID: 80449
Bill URL: View Bill
The bill mandates a review of the state contracting process and payment policies concerning state agency contracts with service providers and nonprofit organizations. It aims to identify ways to streamline and expedite these processes, ensuring timely contract approvals and payments. The review will assess staffing levels, procurement complications, payment delays, and the feasibility of master contracts and carry-forward funding.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-03 | Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate |
2025-06-03 | Transmitted Pursuant To Joint Rule 17 |
2025-06-03 | House Passed |
2025-06-03 | Senate Calendar Number 610 |
2025-05-06 | Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, House |
2025-05-06 | Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners Office |
2025-05-06 | House Calendar Number 535 |
2025-05-06 | File Number 836 |
Why Relevant: The bill mandates a review specifically to identify ways to streamline and expedite government contracting and payment processes, which directly targets government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring a comprehensive review and assessment of current practices, identifying inefficiencies, and exploring new mechanisms (e.g., master contracts, carry-forward funding), the bill creates a procedural mechanism to improve government operations and reduce administrative burdens.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's language is clear in its intent to improve efficiency; however, the scope of potential reforms (such as what constitutes 'streamlining') could be interpreted broadly depending on implementation.
Legislation ID: 77732
Bill URL: View Bill
This act establishes a task force tasked with studying the current regulation adoption process as governed by chapter 54 of the general statutes. The task force will consist of appointed members, including legal experts and state officials, and will make recommendations for legislative improvements. The task force is required to submit its findings by January 1, 2026.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-10 | Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate |
2025-04-10 | Senate Calendar Number 342 |
2025-04-10 | Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners Office |
2025-04-10 | File Number 638 |
2025-04-04 | Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/09/25 5:00 PM |
2025-03-28 | Filed with Legislative Commissioners Office |
2025-03-27 | Joint Favorable |
2025-03-10 | Public Hearing 03/14 |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes a temporary body (a task force) with the purpose of studying and recommending ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the government’s regulation adoption process.
Mechanism of Influence: The task force will analyze the current regulatory process, identify inefficiencies, and propose legislative changes to streamline or modernize how regulations are adopted, potentially reducing administrative burdens and improving responsiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent to study and recommend improvements to a government process (regulation adoption), which inherently relates to efficiency and effectiveness. However, the precise recommendations will depend on the task force’s findings.
Legislation ID: 77728
Bill URL: View Bill
Raised Bill No. 1499 proposes amendments to existing statutes governing state contracting procedures, including the establishment of procurement definitions, the authority of the Chief Procurement Officer, and the responsibilities of the State Contracting Standards Board. It seeks to enhance transparency, efficiency, and compliance in state procurement practices by updating definitions, repealing outdated statutes, and clarifying the roles of state agencies in the procurement process.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-07 | Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate |
2025-05-07 | Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners Office |
2025-05-07 | No New File by Committee on Appropriations |
2025-05-06 | Filed with Legislative Commissioners Office |
2025-05-05 | Joint Favorable |
2025-05-01 | Referred by Senate to Committee on Appropriations |
2025-04-03 | Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners Office |
2025-04-03 | File Number 498 |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations in the area of procurement, through structural and procedural changes.
Mechanism of Influence: It establishes and empowers the State Contracting Standards Board and the Chief Procurement Officer to oversee, standardize, and streamline procurement processes, clarify definitions, and recommend further improvements. These mechanisms are directly designed to reduce inefficiency, ensure compliance, and modernize procurement functions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is specific in its focus on procurement efficiency and compliance, and the language about 'ensuring efficiency' and 'standardizing definitions' is clear in intent. Its scope is limited to procurement rather than all government operations, but procurement is a major area of government efficiency efforts.
Legislation ID: 80825
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill aims to reestablish the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee, which is tasked with reviewing and auditing state agency programs. It also mandates the Auditors of Public Accounts to conduct performance audits and produce reports on state agencies efficiency, effectiveness, and compliance. The bill includes provisions for public hearings where findings and recommendations will be discussed.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-15 | Referred to Joint Committee on Government Oversight |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly creates and empowers bodies (the committee and auditors) to evaluate and improve government efficiency and effectiveness through mandated audits and reviews.
Mechanism of Influence: By conducting performance audits and requiring public hearings on agency efficiency and effectiveness, the bill establishes structural mechanisms to identify inefficiencies and recommend improvements in government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 200608
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends Title 29 of the Delaware Code to establish the Office of Inspector General, which will serve as an independent agency tasked with overseeing state agencies. It defines the offices purpose, powers, and responsibilities, and sets forth procedures for investigations, reporting, and ensuring confidentiality in complaints, thereby fostering public trust in government operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-07-01 | Passed By House. Votes: 30 YES 1 NO 9 ABSENT 1 VACANT |
2025-06-25 | Reported Out of Committee (Appropriations) in House with 4 On Its Merits |
2025-06-20 | Assigned to Appropriations Committee in House |
2025-06-18 | Reported Out of Committee (Administration) in House with 2 Favorable, 3 On Its Merits |
2025-06-05 | Assigned to Administration Committee in House |
2025-05-22 | Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT |
2025-05-22 | Amendment SA 3 to SB 4 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT |
2025-05-22 | Amendment SA 2 to SB 4 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly creates a new government office (Inspector General) with the purpose of overseeing state agencies, investigating complaints, and reporting on government operations, all aimed at preventing fraud and improving public trust. These mechanisms are directly aligned with improving government efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By enabling independent investigations, requiring annual reporting, and mandating reviews by the Joint Legislative Oversight and Sunset Committee, the bill establishes structural and procedural tools to identify inefficiencies, waste, or misconduct in state government, and to recommend improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's stated purpose is to prevent fraud and enhance public trust, which are closely linked to government efficiency, though it does not use the word 'efficiency' directly. However, the creation of oversight mechanisms and mandated reporting are typical government efficiency measures.
Legislation ID: 215147
Bill URL: View Bill
House Joint Resolution 1325 proposes significant amendments to the Florida State Constitution, including the repeal of the Lieutenant Governors office and the Government Efficiency Task Force. It seeks to create a new position of Commissioner of Government Efficiency, revise the processes for government auditing and efficiency, and adjust the succession protocol for the Governors office in cases of vacancy or impeachment. The changes will be submitted for voter approval in upcoming elections.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-16 | S Died in Rules |
2025-05-03 | S Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration |
2025-04-22 | S Received |
2025-04-16 | S Referred to Rules |
2025-04-16 | H Message sent to senate |
2025-04-16 | S In Messages |
2025-04-16 | H Added to Third Reading Calendar |
2025-04-16 | H Read 3rd time |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly proposes the creation of a new Commissioner of Government Efficiency, replacing the repealed Government Efficiency Task Force. This new position is directly tasked with overseeing and improving government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a dedicated official (Commissioner of Government Efficiency), the legislation creates a structural mechanism for identifying and implementing cost savings, streamlining processes, and modernizing government operations. The repeal of the Task Force and establishment of a new position suggests a procedural or organizational shift aimed at enhancing efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The abstract does not provide the precise powers or duties of the new Commissioner, so the scope of influence is somewhat ambiguous. However, the title and context strongly imply a focus on efficiency.
Why Relevant: The bill mandates long-range state planning and regular updates, which are procedural mechanisms aimed at improving government responsiveness and potentially efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: Requiring the governor to recommend biennial revisions to a long-range planning document encourages ongoing evaluation and adaptation of government operations, supporting efficiency and responsiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While long-range planning is not exclusively about efficiency, the requirement for regular review and revision is a procedural mechanism that often serves efficiency goals.
Why Relevant: The bill revises processes for government auditing and efficiency, which are classic mechanisms for evaluating and improving government performance.
Mechanism of Influence: Changes to auditing processes can uncover inefficiencies, duplicative responsibilities, and opportunities for cost savings, directly supporting the bill's stated goal of improving government efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: Details on how auditing processes are revised are not provided in the summary, so the exact scope of efficiency improvements is unclear.
CS/HB 1461 introduces significant changes to the Department of Business and Professional Regulation by renaming, removing, and redesignating various boards and councils. It also modifies licensing authority, removes certain continuing education requirements, and updates application processes for various professions, including engineering, accounting, and cosmetology. The bill seeks to enhance efficiency and reduce regulatory burdens on professionals while ensuring compliance with updated standards.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-16 | H Died in Commerce Committee |
2025-05-03 | H Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration |
2025-04-15 | H Reported out of State Administration Budget Subcommittee |
2025-04-15 | H Now in Commerce Committee |
2025-04-15 | H Favorable by State Administration Budget Subcommittee |
2025-04-11 | H Added to State Administration Budget Subcommittee agenda |
2025-04-11 | H Referred to Commerce Committee |
2025-04-11 | H Referred to State Administration Budget Subcommittee |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly seeks to enhance efficiency and reduce regulatory burdens by renaming, removing, and redesignating boards and councils, and by repealing unnecessary statutes. These structural and procedural changes are designed to streamline government operations and reduce costs.
Mechanism of Influence: By consolidating or eliminating boards and councils, granting direct licensing authority to the Department, and repealing obsolete statutes, the bill reduces bureaucratic layers and administrative burdens. These actions are intended to make government oversight more efficient and responsive.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill clearly states its intent to improve efficiency and reduce regulatory burdens, some measures (like new regulations for mobile barbershops) could add complexity. However, the overall thrust is toward streamlining and modernization.
HB 433 amends various sections of the Florida Statutes related to administrative procedures, particularly concerning the rulemaking process. It introduces definitions for repromulgation and technical change, mandates agencies to follow specific timelines for rule development and notice, and requires the publication of statements of estimated regulatory costs. The bill also outlines procedures for emergency rules and the incorporation of materials by reference, aiming to improve transparency and efficiency in regulatory processes.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-29 | H Laid on Table, refer to CS/SB 108 |
2025-04-24 | H Bill referred to House Calendar |
2025-04-24 | H Added to Second Reading Calendar |
2025-04-21 | H 1st Reading |
2025-04-18 | H CS Filed |
2025-04-18 | H Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a) |
2025-04-18 | H Reported out of State Affairs Committee |
2025-04-17 | H Favorable with CS by State Affairs Committee |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes procedural requirements and mandates studies/reports (e.g., holistic review of permitting) designed to improve regulatory efficiency and reduce unnecessary burdens.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agencies to review and repromulgate rules, consider lower cost alternatives, and submit reports on permitting processes, the bill creates structural mechanisms to identify and implement efficiency improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: Most provisions are explicitly tied to increasing efficiency or reducing costs, such as the requirement for lower cost alternatives and the holistic review/reporting mandate.
Legislation ID: 26457
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill introduces amendments to multiple sections of Florida Statutes to streamline processes for district school boards, reduce certain reporting requirements, and clarify the roles and responsibilities of educational entities. Key changes include exemptions from rule adoption requirements for district school boards, modifications to the duties of the State Board of Education, and adjustments to requirements for student assessments and school financial reporting.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-16 | • Died in Messages |
2025-05-03 | • Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration |
2025-04-03 | • Read 2nd time -SJ 322 • Amendment(s) adopted (169686, 189656, 332758, 498362) -SJ 323 • Read 3rd time -SJ 328 • CS passed as amended; YEAS 37 NAYS 0 -SJ 328 • Immediately certified -SJ 330 |
2025-04-03 | • Read 2nd time • Amendment(s) adopted (169686, 189656, 332758, 498362) • Read 3rd time • CS passed as amended; YEAS 37 NAYS 0 • Immediately certified |
2025-04-03 | • In Messages |
2025-04-03 | • In Messages • In Possession List |
2025-04-02 | • CS by Fiscal Policy read 1st time |
2025-04-01 | • Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/03/25 |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly reduces procedural requirements (such as reporting, auditing, and rule adoption) for school districts and clarifies the roles of educational entities, which are classic measures to improve government efficiency and reduce administrative burdens.
Mechanism of Influence: By removing or simplifying requirements (e.g., deleting the requirement for district accountability plans, removing the internal auditor mandate, exempting school boards from certain rulemaking procedures), the bill aims to streamline operations, reduce duplicative or unnecessary processes, and allow school boards to focus resources more effectively.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill contains many provisions, several are directly aimed at reducing administrative or procedural requirements. Some changes (such as modifying reporting or notification timelines) are less explicitly tied to efficiency, but the overall thrust of the bill is toward streamlined government operations in education.
Legislation ID: 189965
Bill URL: View Bill
House Resolution 949 acknowledges the establishment of the Department of Government Efficiency, highlighting the collaborative efforts of President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. The resolution emphasizes the importance of streamlining federal operations, reducing waste, and enhancing productivity while ensuring accountability and transparency in government spending. It encourages ongoing public-private partnerships to further these goals.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-04 | House Hopper |
Why Relevant: The resolution directly addresses the improvement of government efficiency through the establishment of a dedicated department, support for modernization, and encouragement of collaboration aimed at reducing waste and bureaucracy.
Mechanism of Influence: By commending and encouraging efforts to streamline operations and modernize government, the resolution supports structural and procedural mechanisms for efficiency, such as the Department of Government Efficiency and public-private partnerships.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the resolution expresses support and encouragement, it does not itself establish new entities or mandate specific actions; rather, it acknowledges and supports ongoing efforts.
Legislation ID: 136139
Bill URL: View Bill
This resolution urges the Hawaii State Legislature to create a State Department of Government Efficiency in response to public sentiment favoring scrutiny of government expenditures and a desire to minimize wasteful spending. The resolution highlights the need for careful financial management in light of projected tax cuts and emphasizes the importance of ensuring that taxpayer dollars are used effectively.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-14 | Referred to LMG, LAB, referral sheet 22 |
2025-03-07 | Offered |
Why Relevant: The resolution directly proposes the establishment of a new government entity (Department of Government Efficiency) with the explicit mission to promote government efficiency by scrutinizing expenditures and reducing wasteful spending.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating a dedicated department, the legislation would institutionalize ongoing oversight, evaluation, and reform of government spending practices, targeting inefficiencies and promoting cost savings.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is clear that the department's purpose is government efficiency; however, the specific powers, structure, and methods are not detailed in the abstract.
Legislation ID: 135955
Bill URL: View Bill
This resolution highlights the need for a thorough examination of government expenditures in Hawaii, as a significant majority of voters support reducing spending rather than increasing taxes. With projected state income tax cuts leading to substantial revenue losses, the resolution calls for a dedicated department to oversee and promote government efficiency in managing taxpayer dollars.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-14 | Referred to LMG, LAB, referral sheet 22 |
2025-03-07 | Offered |
Why Relevant: The resolution explicitly proposes the creation of a new department with the mission to promote government efficiency in spending.
Mechanism of Influence: If enacted, this would establish a permanent government entity focused on identifying and implementing cost-saving measures, streamlining expenditures, and ensuring effective use of taxpayer funds.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The resolution urges rather than mandates the creation of the department, so its implementation would depend on subsequent action. However, the stated goal is clear and directly tied to government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 28534
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill establishes a program overseen by the Department of the Attorney General to periodically review all administrative rules adopted by state agencies. It mandates that each agency reviews at least 20% of its rules annually, allowing for the identification and repeal of outdated or unnecessary regulations. The program seeks to streamline rules, improve clarity, and ensure compliance with statutory authority. Additionally, the bill requires annual reporting and public input in the review process, along with appropriations for its implementation.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-10 | Report adopted; Passed Second Reading, as amended (SD 1) and referred to WAM/JDC. |
Why Relevant: The bill is directly designed to improve government efficiency by establishing a structured program for the periodic review and potential repeal of unnecessary or outdated regulations.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular reviews, reporting, and public input, the bill creates a mechanism to streamline bureaucratic processes, reduce regulatory burdens, and ensure agencies operate under up-to-date and necessary rules. The oversight by the Attorney General's office and annual reporting further institutionalize efficiency and accountability.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent to streamline rules and remove unnecessary regulations, leaving little ambiguity about its efficiency goals.
Legislation ID: 27116
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill appropriates funds for the legislative reference bureau to procure an AI tool that will analyze the Hawaii Revised Statutes and Hawaii Administrative Rules. The goal is to identify provisions that are obsolete, duplicative, or inconsistent with existing laws. The bureau will report its findings and recommendations to the legislature by a specified deadline.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-21 | Referred to LMG, FIN, referral sheet 2 |
Why Relevant: The bill's explicit purpose is to streamline government operations by identifying and recommending the removal of obsolete, duplicative, or inconsistent legal provisions, which directly promotes government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By using AI to analyze statutes and administrative rules, the bill aims to uncover inefficiencies and redundancies in the law, leading to recommendations for legislative action that can reduce administrative burdens and improve the clarity and effectiveness of government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent to promote efficiency by targeting obsolete and duplicative laws. The requirement for a report with recommendations further grounds its relevance to government efficiency.
This bill proposes the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency Legislative Task Force (DOGE) within Idahos government. The task force will consist of nine legislative members tasked with reviewing agency functions, regulatory processes, and budget authority to promote effective governance. The bill outlines the structure, membership, and responsibilities of the task force, including the establishment of subgroups focused on regulatory accountability, budget accountability, and government operations. The task force will operate until November 30, 2029, with a sunset provision included.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-11 | Introduced, read first time; referred to: State Affairs |
2025-03-11 | Received from the House passed; filed for first reading |
2025-03-10 | Rules Suspended: Ayes 62 Nays 3 Abs/Excd 5, read in full as required –PASSED - 43-23-4AYES– Alfieri, Andrus, Barbieri, Beiswenger, Boyle, Bruce, Burgoyne, Cannon, Clow, Cornilles, Crane(12), Crane(13), Dygert, Ehardt, Ehlers, Erickson, Fuhriman, Furniss, Garner, Harris, Hawkins, Healey, Hill, Holtzclaw, Horman, Manwaring, Mendive, Mickelsen, Miller, Mitchell, Palmer, Petzke, Pohanka, Price, Sauter, Scott, Shepherd, Shirts, Skaug, Tanner(13), Tanner(14), Wisniewski, Mr. SpeakerNAYS– Achilles, Berch, Cayler, Cheatum, Church, Egbert, Gannon, Handy, Hostetler, Leavitt, Marmon, Mathias, McCann, Monks, Nelsen, Pickett, Rasor, Raybould, Raymond, Rubel, Thompson, Weber, WheelerAbsent– Galaviz, Green, Redman, Vander WoudeFloor Sponsor - Crane(12)Title apvd - to Senate |
2025-03-10 | Read second time; Filed for Third Reading |
2025-03-07 | Reported out of Committee with Do Pass Recommendation, Filed for Second Reading |
2025-03-05 | Reported Printed and Referred to State Affairs |
2025-03-04 | Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly creates a legislative task force with the stated goal of enhancing government efficiency in Idaho.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a dedicated body to review agency operations, regulatory processes, and budget authority, and by empowering it to create subgroups on regulatory and budget accountability, the bill sets up structural mechanisms to identify inefficiencies, recommend improvements, and potentially streamline government functions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent and structure; the language directly states the purpose is to promote effective governance and efficiency, leaving little ambiguity about its relevance to government efficiency.
This bill introduces the Idaho Personnel Reduction Act, which mandates state departments to identify and eliminate vacant full-time equivalent positions that have been unfilled for over 180 days. Additionally, it requires detailed reporting of state employee travel expenses to ensure transparency and accountability in government spending.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-25 | Received from the House passed; filed for first reading |
2025-03-25 | Introduced, read first time; referred to: Finance |
2025-03-24 | Rules Suspended: Ayes 70 Nays 0 Abs/Excd 0, read in full as required –PASSED - 65-4-1AYES– Alfieri, Andrus, Barbieri, Beiswenger, Boyle, Bruce, Burgoyne, Cannon, Cayler, Cheatum, Church, Clow, Cornilles, Crane(12), Crane(13), Dygert, Egbert, Ehardt, Ehlers, Erickson, Fuhriman, Furniss, Galaviz, Garner, Green(Lesmeister), Handy, Harris, Hawkins, Healey, Hill, Holtzclaw, Horman, Hostetler, Leavitt, Manwaring, Marmon, Mathias, McCann, Mendive, Mickelsen, Miller, Mitchell, Monks, Nelsen, Palmer, Petzke, Pickett, Pohanka, Price, Rasor, Raybould, Redman, Sauter, Scott, Shepherd, Shirts, Skaug, Tanner(13), Tanner(14), Thompson, Vander Woude, Weber, Wheeler, Wisniewski, Mr. SpeakerNAYS– Achilles, Berch, Gannon, RubelAbsent– RaymondFloor Sponsor - HormanTitle apvd - to Senate |
2025-03-24 | Read second time; Filed for Third Reading |
2025-03-21 | Reported out of Committee with Do Pass Recommendation, Filed for Second Reading |
2025-03-19 | Reported Printed and Referred to Appropriations |
2025-03-18 | Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing |
Why Relevant: This bill explicitly aims to improve government efficiency and reduce waste by eliminating unfilled positions and increasing transparency in travel spending.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating the elimination of long-term vacant positions, the bill directly streamlines government operations and reduces unnecessary expenditures. The required travel expense reporting creates a structural mechanism for oversight and potential cost savings.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The intent to promote efficiency and reduce waste is clearly stated in both provisions. The language is specific about the mechanisms (elimination of positions, mandatory reporting) and their intended outcomes.
This bill introduces two new sections to Idaho Code: the Idaho Personnel Reduction Act, which mandates annual reporting of vacant full-time equivalent positions in state departments, and a section on reporting state employee travel expenses. The goal is to identify and eliminate wasteful spending in government to save taxpayer dollars and increase public trust in government operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-03 | Received from the House passed; filed for first reading |
2025-04-03 | Introduced, read first time; referred to: State Affairs |
2025-04-02 | Rules Suspended: Ayes 65 Nays 0 Abs/Excd 5, read in full as required –PASSED - 65-0-5AYES– Achilles, Alfieri, Andrus, Barbieri, Beiswenger, Berch, Boyle, Bruce, Burgoyne, Cannon, Cayler, Cheatum, Church, Cornilles, Crane(12), Crane(13), Dygert, Egbert, Ehardt, Ehlers, Erickson, Fuhriman, Furniss, Galaviz, Gannon, Garner, Handy, Harris, Hawkins, Healey, Hill(Brown), Holtzclaw, Hostetler, Leavitt, Manwaring, Marmon, Mathias, McCann, Mendive, Mickelsen, Miller, Mitchell, Monks, Nelsen, Palmer, Petzke, Pickett, Pohanka, Price, Rasor, Raybould, Raymond, Redman, Sauter, Scott(Dotson), Shepherd, Shirts, Skaug, Tanner(13), Tanner(14), Thompson, Weber, Wheeler, Wisniewski, Mr. SpeakerNAYS– NoneAbsent– Clow, Green, Horman, Rubel, Vander Woude(Harris)Floor Sponsor - MonksTitle apvd - to Senate |
2025-04-02 | Read second time; Filed for Third Reading |
2025-04-01 | Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing |
2025-04-01 | Reported Printed; Filed for Second Reading |
Why Relevant: The bill creates new reporting requirements and structural mechanisms (annual department reports) specifically designed to identify inefficiencies and waste in state government staffing and travel expenditures, with the explicit goal of improving government efficiency and saving taxpayer dollars.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating detailed annual reports on unfilled positions and travel expenses, the bill provides data for decision-makers to reduce unnecessary costs, streamline operations, and potentially eliminate redundant or wasteful positions and expenditures. This could lead to more efficient allocation of resources and budgetary savings.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent to promote efficiency and reduce waste; however, the ultimate actions taken based on these reports (such as actual position eliminations or travel reductions) are at the discretion of policymakers, so the direct effect depends on follow-through.
This bill creates the Department of Government Efficiency within the Office of the Auditor General. It aims to improve the efficiency of state government operations by advising policymakers on regulatory rescissions, administrative reductions, and cost savings. The department will be overseen by a Board of Directors, which includes the Auditor General and other appointed members, and will issue reports to the Governor and General Assembly regarding its findings and recommendations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-14 | Added Co-SponsorRep. Chris Miller |
2025-03-11 | Added Co-SponsorRep. Charles Meier |
2025-03-05 | Added Co-SponsorRep. Bradley Fritts |
2025-02-20 | Added Co-SponsorRep. Patrick Windhorst |
2025-02-18 | Added Co-SponsorRep. Brad Halbrook |
2025-02-18 | Added Co-SponsorRep. Paul Jacobs |
2025-02-11 | Added Chief Co-SponsorRep. Tony M. McCombie |
2025-02-11 | Added Chief Co-SponsorRep. Norine K. Hammond |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a new department with the explicit mission to improve government efficiency, reduce administrative costs, and streamline operations. It also creates structural mechanisms (a board, reporting requirements, advisory roles) aimed at identifying and implementing efficiency measures.
Mechanism of Influence: The Department of Government Efficiency will advise policymakers, recommend regulatory and administrative changes, and issue regular reports to the Governor and General Assembly. It is empowered to consult on audits and request information from agencies, giving it practical tools to drive efficiency improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
This bill amends the Illinois State Auditing Act and the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act to require the Auditor General to conduct a comprehensive survey of the Illinois Administrative Code. The survey will identify the number of mandates and restrictions affecting the private sector and local governments. Following the survey, state agencies will be required to report on their findings and take action to reduce the total number of mandates to a specified limit. The bill also allows the use of artificial intelligence to assist in these tasks.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-04 | Referred toRules Committee |
2025-02-04 | First Reading |
2025-01-29 | Filed with the Clerk byRep. Jed Davis |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes new procedural mechanisms—a comprehensive survey, follow-up reporting, and mandated rule reduction—designed to streamline government operations, reduce regulatory burdens, and improve efficiency. It empowers the Auditor General and the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules to oversee and enforce these changes.
Mechanism of Influence: It creates a process for identifying and quantifying regulatory mandates, requires agencies to acknowledge and act on these findings, and sets enforceable targets for reducing regulatory burdens. The use of artificial intelligence is authorized to improve the efficiency of these processes.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit about its goals and mechanisms. The requirement to reduce mandates and the oversight structure are clearly tied to government efficiency. The exact definition of 'mandates and restrictions' may be subject to interpretation, but the overall intent is clear.
The Department of Government Efficiency Act establishes a new department tasked with overseeing and improving the efficiency of State government operations. The Act mandates annual audits of State agencies, the establishment of performance indicators, and the consolidation of overlapping programs. It also emphasizes the need for technological advancements to improve transparency and streamline operations. The Act seeks to eliminate programs that prioritize ideology over taxpayer benefits and aims to restore public trust in government by focusing on accountability and efficiency.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-26 | Referred toAssignments |
2025-02-26 | Filed with Secretary bySen. Andrew S. Chesney |
2025-02-26 | First Reading |
Why Relevant: The bill's explicit purpose is to improve government efficiency by establishing a permanent department tasked with oversight, audits, and recommending structural changes.
Mechanism of Influence: The new department will have the authority to conduct audits, set performance standards, consolidate services, and implement technology, all of which are direct mechanisms to increase efficiency and reduce waste.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The mission includes language about 'combating ideological indoctrination,' which could be interpreted broadly, but the core operational provisions (audits, consolidation, KPIs) are clearly focused on efficiency.
Legislation ID: 103010
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill No. 417 mandates the inspector general to prepare an annual list of all executive boards, committees, and commissions starting in 2026, and to conduct efficiency reviews of at least 25% of these entities from 2027 onward. The results of these reviews will be reported to the legislative council, promoting transparency and efficiency in state government operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-13 | First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary |
2025-01-13 | Authored by Senator Carrasco |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a structural mechanism (inspector general-led efficiency reviews) with the explicit purpose of improving government efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular efficiency reviews and public reporting, the bill aims to identify inefficiencies, eliminate unnecessary commissions, and recommend resource reallocation for better government performance.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Senate Bill No. 5 addresses various state fiscal and contracting matters, allowing state agencies to utilize artificial intelligence for budget projections. It mandates agencies to report to the budget committee before submitting federal fund requests that require state matching funds. The bill also requires quarterly reports on active contracts, reauthorization of long-vacant positions, and transparency in state contracts. Additionally, it prohibits nonpublic contracts and ensures all contract opportunities are publicly posted.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-06 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-04-29 | Signed by the President of the Senate |
2025-04-24 | Signed by the Speaker |
2025-04-24 | Signed by the President Pro Tempore |
2025-04-23 | Conference Committee Report 1: adopted by the Senate; Roll Call 488: yeas 48, nays 0 |
2025-04-23 | Rules Suspended. Conference Committee Report 1: adopted by the House; Roll Call 524: yeas 90, nays 1 |
2025-04-22 | CCR # 1 filed in the Senate |
2025-04-22 | CCR # 1 filed in the House |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes and strengthens procedural mechanisms (reporting, oversight, transparency) designed to improve government efficiency, reduce costs, and promote accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: It requires agencies to use technology (AI) for budget projections, mandates regular reporting and review of contracts and positions, and sets up processes for oversight of federal fund requests and Medicaid program finances, all aimed at streamlining operations and eliminating waste.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 105020
Bill URL: View Bill
House Study Bill 325 allows two or more governmental units within Iowa to enter into joint agreements to combine their services related to tax levying, collection, and property assessment. This initiative is intended to promote cost savings and operational efficiency among political subdivisions such as counties, cities, school districts, and townships.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-09 | Subcommittee recommends passage. |
2025-04-08 | Subcommittee Meeting: 04/09/2025 12:45PM House Lounge. |
2025-04-01 | Subcommittee: Wills, J., Nordman and Wichtendahl.H.J. 877. |
2025-04-01 | Introduced, referred to Ways and Means.H.J. 04/01. |
2025-04-01 | Introduced, referred to Ways and Means.H.J. 876. |
2025-04-01 | Subcommittee: Wills, J., Nordman and Wichtendahl.H.J. 04/01. |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to promote cost savings and operational efficiency by allowing governmental units to combine services related to tax functions.
Mechanism of Influence: By permitting joint agreements, the bill facilitates the consolidation of administrative services, which can reduce duplication, streamline processes, and lower costs.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not specify exact metrics or mechanisms for measuring efficiency gains, but the purpose is clearly stated as improving operational efficiency.
Legislation ID: 67996
Bill URL: View Bill
House File 719 requires the Iowa Department of Revenue to issue a request for proposals to hire a private entity for a study on local taxing authorities. This study is intended to identify the most efficient and cost-effective methods for these authorities to levy and collect taxes, as well as assess property values. The bill outlines the timeline for issuing the proposals, executing a contract, and submitting a report to the General Assembly.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-03 | Introduced, referred to State Government.H.J. 485. |
Why Relevant: This bill directly requires a study aimed at improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of government tax collection and assessment processes at the local level.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating a study focused on identifying efficient methods for tax administration, the bill creates a procedural mechanism (a contracted study and subsequent report) specifically intended to make government operations more efficient and less costly.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its purpose: the study must focus on efficiency and cost-effectiveness. There is little ambiguity regarding its intent to promote government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 67990
Bill URL: View Bill
House File 720 enables two or more governmental units in Iowa, such as counties, cities, school districts, or townships, to combine their services and authority related to tax levying, collection, and property assessment. This collaboration is facilitated through a joint agreement under Code chapter 28E, aimed at promoting cost savings and operational efficiency.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-03 | Introduced, referred to State Government.H.J. 485. |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly enables structural mechanisms (joint agreements) for governmental units to collaborate on tax-related functions, explicitly aiming to promote cost savings and operational efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By allowing and requiring joint agreements, the bill empowers governmental units to consolidate services, reduce duplication, and streamline processes, which directly targets government efficiency and cost reduction.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's language centers on tax-related services, but the intent to promote efficiency and cost savings is clear and explicit. The scope is limited to tax functions, not government operations as a whole.
Legislation ID: 68361
Bill URL: View Bill
House File 381 introduces amendments to various sections of the Iowa Code to correct language, resolve inconsistencies, and ensure that definitions and references are accurate and up-to-date. The bill aims to streamline the legal framework and eliminate redundancies, thereby enhancing the overall clarity and functionality of the Code.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-19 | Subcommittee recommends passage. |
2025-02-19 | Committee report approving bill, renumbered asSF 396. |
2025-02-17 | Subcommittee Meeting: 02/19/2025 9:30AM Room 217 Conference Room. |
2025-02-13 | Subcommittee: Lofgren, Blake, and Green. |
2025-02-13 | Introduced, referred to Judiciary. |
Why Relevant: The bill includes provisions that require agencies to maintain and update performance data and classify records, which are procedural mechanisms intended to improve monitoring and management of government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating agencies to regularly update performance data and classify records for safeguarding and accessibility, the bill establishes clearer operational standards. This could improve the efficiency, transparency, and accountability of government agencies.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill clarifies processes and definitions, it does not explicitly establish new bodies or task forces dedicated solely to government efficiency. However, the requirement for agencies to maintain and update performance metrics is a direct procedural mechanism aimed at improving government effectiveness.
Why Relevant: The bill overall focuses on clarifying and streamlining Iowa Code, which can be seen as an effort to reduce redundancy and improve governmental processes.
Mechanism of Influence: By correcting inconsistencies and updating definitions, the legislation may reduce confusion and bureaucratic friction, indirectly contributing to more efficient government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not establish new entities or require studies/audits specifically for efficiency purposes, but the intent to streamline the legal framework is consistent with efficiency goals.
Legislation ID: 68385
Bill URL: View Bill
House Study Bill 115 seeks to amend various sections of the Iowa Code to ensure clarity and accuracy in statutory language. The bill addresses specific sections by correcting terms, updating definitions, and refining the language used in the Code to align with contemporary practices and eliminate confusion. It includes provisions for the responsibilities of agencies regarding data management, the classification of records, and the reporting of gifts, among other adjustments.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-08 | HF 381substituted.S.J. 726. |
2025-04-08 | Withdrawn.S.J. 727. |
2025-04-03 | Placed on calendar under unfinished business.S.J. 689. |
2025-03-12 | Attached toHF 381.S.J. 495. |
2025-02-20 | Committee report, approving bill.S.J. 332. |
2025-02-20 | Introduced, placed on calendar.S.J. 322. |
Why Relevant: Section 8E.208 requires agencies to maintain data critical for monitoring and assessing their performance, which is a procedural mechanism aimed at improving government effectiveness and accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating agencies to identify, collect, and maintain performance metrics, this provision could enhance the ability of oversight bodies to evaluate government programs and identify inefficiencies.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the section mandates performance data collection, it does not explicitly state the purpose is to improve efficiency or reduce costs, but the intent to monitor and assess performance is closely aligned.
Why Relevant: Section 8E.209 clarifies agency responsibilities in classifying and safeguarding records and providing data to the department as requested, which supports transparency and potentially streamlines information sharing.
Mechanism of Influence: Improved data classification and accessibility could reduce administrative burdens and improve inter-agency coordination, indirectly promoting efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The section is focused on record-keeping and data provision, without an explicit efficiency mandate, but it supports efficiency through better data management.
Legislation ID: 52318
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill No. 2088 establishes the fast-track permits act, which requires local governments to meet specific deadlines for issuing building permits and other approvals for real estate development. It mandates that the Secretary of Health and Environment must issue decisions on stormwater discharge applications within 45 days. The bill aims to expedite the permitting process to foster economic development.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-10 | House |
2025-03-26 | House |
2025-03-24 | Senate |
2025-03-21 | House |
2025-03-20 | House |
2025-03-19 | Senate |
2025-03-14 | Senate |
2025-03-05 | Senate |
Why Relevant: The bill creates structural and procedural requirements that directly target government efficiency in permit processing, aiming to reduce bureaucratic delays and streamline approval processes.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating specific deadlines, requiring prompt notification of incomplete applications, and instituting automatic approval for inaction, the bill compels local governments to adopt more efficient, responsive administrative practices. This reduces administrative burdens and accelerates decision-making.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's efficiency focus is explicit in its purpose (expediting permitting), and its mechanisms are clearly procedural. However, it is primarily limited to the permitting process for development, not government operations broadly.
Legislation ID: 52415
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill No. 2217 amends existing law to empower the office of the inspector general within the attorney generals office to conduct investigations, audits, and performance reviews of state assistance programs. It aims to improve program integrity, deter fraud, and ensure compliance with legal standards. The bill outlines the definitions, duties, and powers of the inspector general, ensuring independence from political influence and establishing protocols for investigations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-10 | House |
2025-03-25 | House |
2025-03-20 | Senate |
2025-03-18 | Senate |
2025-03-17 | House |
2025-03-13 | Senate |
2025-03-12 | House |
2025-03-12 | Senate |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes a permanent office (Inspector General) with the explicit mission of conducting audits, investigations, and performance reviews to improve the integrity and efficiency of state assistance programs.
Mechanism of Influence: By centralizing oversight, granting broad investigative and audit powers, and requiring reporting of findings, the bill creates a structural mechanism to identify fraud, waste, and inefficiency, thereby directly promoting government efficiency and cost savings.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill emphasizes fraud deterrence and compliance, the Inspector General’s duties include performance reviews, which typically encompass efficiency and effectiveness evaluations. However, the primary stated goal is integrity and fraud prevention, not general government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 52432
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill No. 2237 amends existing laws concerning state agency employee awards by increasing the cap on awards to $10,000, allowing for hiring, recruitment, and retention bonuses, and requiring annual reporting to legislative committees. It also eliminates the secretary of administration’s authority to adopt regulations while mandating oversight and consistency in award programs across state agencies. The bill establishes a suggestion program for employees to propose cost-saving measures, with incentives for adopted suggestions.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-21 | Senate |
2025-03-20 | Senate |
2025-03-19 | House |
2025-03-13 | House |
2025-02-27 | House |
2025-02-04 | House |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes a program to incentivize state employees to propose cost-saving measures and process improvements, with the goal of increasing government efficiency and reducing costs.
Mechanism of Influence: By offering financial incentives for employee suggestions that result in cost savings, and requiring annual reporting, the bill creates structural mechanisms to identify and implement efficiency improvements in government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's intent and mechanisms are clearly tied to promoting efficiency and cost savings; there is little ambiguity as to its relevance.
Legislation ID: 52476
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill No. 2291 establishes a regulatory relief division within the Kansas attorney generals office, tasked with administering a general regulatory sandbox program. This program aims to support innovation by allowing businesses to temporarily waive or suspend certain regulatory requirements, facilitating the testing of new products or services. The bill outlines the structure of the division, the roles of advisory committees, and the process for businesses to apply for participation in the sandbox program, including reporting requirements and consultation with relevant agencies.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-10 | House |
2025-03-25 | House |
2025-03-19 | Senate |
2025-03-14 | Senate |
2025-03-10 | Senate |
2025-03-03 | House |
2025-02-28 | Senate |
2025-02-27 | Senate |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly creates a new division (regulatory relief division) and an advisory committee within a state agency with the stated mission of streamlining regulations and facilitating innovation, which aligns with the goal of improving government efficiency and responsiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a division and advisory committee to review, waive, and recommend changes to regulations, and by mandating inter-agency coordination and reporting, the bill sets up structural and procedural mechanisms to reduce regulatory burdens and modernize government functions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The focus is on regulatory relief and innovation, but the bill directly empowers government entities to identify and act upon opportunities to make government more efficient in its regulatory functions.
Legislation ID: 52244
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill No. 99 mandates that the heads of state agencies certify the number of full-time positions funded by the state general fund that have been vacant for over 180 days. These positions will be abolished effective July 1, 2025, and the corresponding salary appropriations will be lapsed from the state budget for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. This measure is intended to enhance government efficiency and fiscal responsibility.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-18 | Senate |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to enhance government efficiency and fiscal responsibility by eliminating persistently vacant positions and removing their funding from the state budget.
Mechanism of Influence: It establishes a procedural mechanism requiring agency heads to review and certify long-term vacancies, leading to the automatic abolition of such positions and the lapsing of their appropriations. This directly targets government efficiency by reducing unnecessary spending and streamlining agency staffing.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent and mechanism; the only potential ambiguity could lie in how 'vacant' is defined or whether agencies could manipulate position status to avoid abolition.
Legislation ID: 165620
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill revises KRS 13A to update definitions, processes, and requirements for administrative regulations in Kentucky. It addresses the roles of administrative bodies, the nature of emergency regulations, and the responsibilities of the Legislative Research Commission in handling and maintaining these regulations. The amendments are intended to enhance transparency, efficiency, and compliance with federal mandates.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-25 | signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 88) |
2025-03-14 | received in House enrolled, signed by Speaker of the House enrolled, signed by President of the Senate delivered to Governor |
2025-03-13 | reported favorably, to Rules posted for passage in the Regular Orders of the Day for Thursday, March 13, 2025 3rd reading, passed 38-0 |
2025-03-12 | taken from Licensing & Occupations (S) 2nd reading returned to Licensing & Occupations (S) |
2025-03-07 | to Licensing & Occupations (S) taken from Licensing & Occupations (S) 1st reading returned to Licensing & Occupations (S) |
2025-03-06 | received in Senate to Committee on Committees (S) |
2025-03-05 | 3rd reading, passed 98-0 with Floor Amendment (1) |
2025-03-04 | floor amendment (1) filed |
Why Relevant: The bill's amendments are explicitly intended to enhance the efficiency of government operations in the realm of administrative regulations. It updates processes and responsibilities to streamline how regulations are handled, filed, and corrected.
Mechanism of Influence: By defining roles, improving document handling, and expediting correction of non-substantive errors, the bill aims to reduce bureaucratic delays and make regulatory processes more efficient. The requirements for emergency regulations also introduce procedural safeguards that can streamline urgent regulatory action while maintaining oversight.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill states its intent to enhance efficiency, the actual mechanisms are procedural updates rather than the creation of new oversight bodies or mandated studies. The efficiency gains are implied by more precise definitions and clarified responsibilities rather than by structural reforms or new evaluations.
Legislation ID: 165689
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill 498 proposes that the Kentucky Supreme Court conduct a pilot project to test the implementation of artificial intelligence for transcription services during court proceedings. This initiative is intended to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of AI in enhancing judicial processes. The project would be voluntary, requiring participation from judges in selected districts or circuits, and would not proceed without sufficient funding from the General Assembly.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-21 | to Judiciary (H) |
2025-02-13 | introduced in House to Committee on Committees (H) |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to test whether AI can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of court transcription, a core government function. The pilot is structured as a study to evaluate a new technology for potential cost savings and process improvements.
Mechanism of Influence: By piloting AI transcription, the bill could identify ways to streamline judicial operations, reduce reliance on manual transcription, and potentially lower costs and administrative burdens. If successful, it could lead to broader adoption of technology to modernize government functions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent to assess efficiency and effectiveness, though it does not guarantee implementation beyond the pilot stage. The scope is limited to transcription services, but the findings could have broader implications for court operations.
Legislation ID: 166117
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends various sections of KRS Chapter 13A, which governs administrative regulations in Kentucky. It clarifies definitions, processes for filing and reviewing regulations, and the roles of various administrative bodies and committees. The amendments are intended to improve the efficiency and transparency of administrative regulation processes and ensure compliance with both state and federal mandates.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-26 | 2nd reading, to Rules |
2025-02-25 | reported favorably, 1st reading, to Calendar |
2025-02-19 | to Licensing & Occupations (S) |
2025-02-14 | introduced in Senate to Committee on Committees (S) |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to improve the efficiency and transparency of the administrative regulation process by clarifying procedures, enhancing oversight, and specifying the roles of entities tasked with regulatory review and maintenance.
Mechanism of Influence: It empowers the Administrative Regulation Review Subcommittee to conduct continuous studies and make recommendations for changes, and it clarifies the responsibilities of the Administrative Regulations Compiler, which should lead to more streamlined and effective management of regulations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill's language focuses on process improvements, the intent to promote efficiency and transparency is clear. The continuous studies and recommendations for legislative changes are direct mechanisms for improving government operations.
Legislation ID: 166593
Bill URL: View Bill
The resolution supports the creation of the Kentucky Discipline of Government Efficiency Task Force, which will evaluate Executive Branch expenditures and recommend strategies to improve government efficiency and save costs. It emphasizes the importance of collaboration between citizens and government to achieve these goals.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-28 | adopted |
2025-03-27 | to Senate Floor |
2025-03-14 | introduced in Senate to Committee on Committees (S) |
Why Relevant: The resolution directly establishes a task force whose explicit mission is to evaluate government expenditures and recommend ways to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating a dedicated task force with a mandate to study expenditures and propose efficiency strategies, the resolution establishes a structural mechanism to identify and implement government improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language clearly states the purpose is to improve efficiency and generate savings, with a formal reporting requirement. There is no ambiguity about the intent.
This bill amends KRS 12.028 to allow the Governor and other state officials to propose changes to the organizational structure of state government. It outlines the process for submitting reorganization plans to the General Assembly, which must include detailed explanations, financial implications, and expected improvements in service delivery. Additionally, it establishes monitoring mechanisms for the implementation of these plans and specifies how funds should be handled post-reorganization.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-20 | to State & Local Government (S) |
2025-02-18 | introduced in Senate to Committee on Committees (S) |
Why Relevant: The bill directly targets government efficiency by requiring that any proposed reorganization of state government be justified with anticipated improvements in service delivery and efficiency. It also establishes mechanisms for oversight and reporting on the effectiveness of these changes.
Mechanism of Influence: It empowers the executive branch to propose structural changes, mandates detailed justifications including efficiency gains, and requires ongoing legislative oversight and reporting on outcomes, all of which are explicit mechanisms to improve government efficiency and effectiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in requiring that reorganization plans address expected improvements in efficiency and service delivery, leaving little ambiguity about its intent to promote government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 166345
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill creates the Office of Government Efficiency tasked with conducting performance audits, recommending improvements, and monitoring the implementation of efficiency measures in state agencies. It outlines the structure of the Office of the State Auditor, detailing its various divisions and offices, and sets forth provisions for staffing and funding.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-06 | received in House to Committee on Committees (H) |
2025-03-05 | 3rd reading, passed 32-6 with Committee Substitute (1) and Floor Amendment (1) |
2025-03-04 | reported favorably, to Rules with Committee Substitute (1) posted for passage in the Regular Orders of the Day for Wednesday, March 05, 2025 floor amendment (1) filed to Committee Substitute |
2025-02-28 | taken from State & Local Government (S) 2nd reading returned to State & Local Government (S) |
2025-02-27 | taken from State & Local Government (S) 1st reading returned to State & Local Government (S) |
2025-02-21 | to State & Local Government (S) |
2025-02-18 | introduced in Senate to Committee on Committees (S) |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly creates a new office dedicated to evaluating and improving government efficiency through audits, recommendations, and monitoring.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a permanent entity tasked with identifying inefficiencies, recommending best practices, and ensuring follow-through, the bill directly targets structural and procedural reforms to make government more efficient and less costly.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is clear in its intent to promote efficiency; the scope of 'efficiency measures' could be broad, but the mechanisms (audits, best practices, monitoring) are well-defined.
Legislation ID: 186889
Bill URL: View Bill
This concurrent resolution directs the legislative auditor to obtain a report from the National Center for State Courts regarding a work point study of the judiciary and to examine the judiciarys plan for implementing any recommendations from the report. The auditor is required to report findings to the legislature by April 1, 2026.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-04 | Read by title and returned to the Calendar, subject to call. |
2025-06-03 | Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading. |
2025-06-03 | Read by title, roll called on final consideration, yeas 80, nays 2. The resolution was adopted and ordered to the Senate. |
2025-06-02 | Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading. |
2025-06-02 | Scheduled for floor debate on 06/03/2025. |
2025-05-29 | Reported with amendments (13-0). |
2025-05-19 | Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Judiciary. |
2025-05-15 | Read by title. Lies over under the rules. |
Why Relevant: The resolution explicitly authorizes a study focused on the efficiency, financial accountability, and effectiveness of the judiciary, which fits the criteria of evaluating government performance and efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating an external study and requiring the legislative auditor to examine both the findings and the implementation plan, the resolution sets up a mechanism for identifying inefficiencies and recommending improvements in judicial operations. The required report to the legislature could prompt legislative or administrative action to streamline or modernize court functions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The resolution is clear in its focus on efficiency and effectiveness, but does not itself implement changes; rather, it sets up an evaluative and reporting process. The actual impact will depend on subsequent actions taken in response to the findings.
Legislation ID: 103883
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill No. 33 establishes the Government Accountability and Innovation for Net Savings (GAINS) tax credit program, providing a tax credit against individual income tax for eligible state employees who identify and implement savings proposals within state agencies. The program aims to reward employees for suggestions that lead to monetary savings, operational efficiencies, and improved public service delivery. The total credits available per fiscal year are capped at $10 million, with specific criteria for credit certification and a structured process for application and recovery of credits.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-12 | Read by title and returned to the Calendar, subject to call. |
2025-05-08 | Rules suspended. Recalled from Committee. |
2025-05-08 | Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage. |
2025-04-29 | Read by title. Ordered engrossed and recommitted to the Committee on Finance. |
2025-04-28 | Reported favorably. |
2025-04-14 | Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Revenue and Fiscal Affairs. |
2025-03-31 | Prefiled and under the rules provisionally referred to the Committee on Revenue and Fiscal Affairs. |
Why Relevant: The bill's stated purpose is to encourage state employees to submit proposals for cost savings and operational efficiencies within their agencies, directly aiming to enhance fiscal responsibility and transparency in state operations.
Mechanism of Influence: It establishes a structured process and incentive (tax credit) for employees to identify and implement efficiency improvements, with oversight, verification, and a formal review process to ensure only effective proposals are rewarded.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: It establishes a new program and authorizes the Department of Revenue and the commissioner to promulgate rules and administer the process, which are structural mechanisms to improve government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating a formal process for reviewing, certifying, and rewarding efficiency proposals, the bill institutionalizes ongoing efforts to improve government effectiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill specifies a cap on credits and a termination date, ensuring the program is both fiscally responsible and time-limited, with rules for recapture in cases of misuse.
Mechanism of Influence: These provisions ensure the program is accountable and can be evaluated for effectiveness, with corrective mechanisms if credits are improperly granted.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 187566
Bill URL: View Bill
This concurrent resolution requests the legislative auditor to conduct a performance audit of the Department of States election integrity policies and practices, including a comparison with other states methods. It emphasizes the need for post-election audits to assure citizens of the election processs accuracy and security. The audit is to be conducted every four years, starting after the 2028 presidential election.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-10 | Sent to the Secretary of State by the Secretary of the Senate. |
2025-06-09 | Signed by the Speaker of the House. |
2025-06-09 | Enrolled. Signed by the President of the Senate. |
2025-06-08 | Read by title, rules suspended, concurred in by vote of 88 yeay, 6 nays. |
2025-06-08 | Received from the House without amendments. |
2025-06-04 | Scheduled for floor debate on 06/10/2025. |
2025-06-04 | Read by title, passed to 3rd reading. |
2025-06-03 | Reported favorably (9-0). |
Why Relevant: The resolution explicitly requires recurring performance audits to evaluate a government department's operations, with the stated goal of ensuring accuracy and security in election administration. Performance audits are a structural mechanism to improve government effectiveness and accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular, comprehensive audits and cross-state comparisons, the resolution seeks to identify inefficiencies, best practices, and potential improvements in the election process. This could lead to recommendations for streamlining procedures or adopting more effective policies.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The resolution focuses specifically on election integrity, which is a narrower aspect of government efficiency. While it does not mention cost savings or reducing bureaucracy, performance audits are generally intended to improve effectiveness and can uncover inefficiencies.
Legislation ID: 112656
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill No. 54 amends and reenacts various statutes related to fiscal administration in Louisiana. It introduces provisions for the appointment of limited jurisdiction fiscal administrators, outlines their duties, and establishes criteria for determining financial stability. The bill also sets forth penalties for violations by officials and creates a revolving loan fund to assist political subdivisions in financial distress.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-08 | Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 96. |
2025-06-08 | Effective date 8/1/2025. |
2025-06-04 | Sent to the Governor by the Secretary of the Senate. |
2025-06-03 | Signed by the Speaker of the House. |
2025-06-03 | Enrolled. Signed by the President of the Senate. |
2025-06-02 | Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 95, nays 0. Finally passed, ordered to the Senate. |
2025-06-02 | Received from the House without amendments. |
2025-05-28 | Scheduled for floor debate on 05/29/2025. |
Why Relevant: The bill creates and empowers new administrative entities (fiscal administrators) whose explicit mission is to restore and maintain financial stability in government subdivisions, which is directly tied to improving government efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating audits, balanced budgets, and granting administrators authority over budgets, contracts, and personnel, the bill establishes structural mechanisms to enforce fiscal discipline and streamline operations in distressed political subdivisions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit about its efficiency goals, as the administrators are tasked with resolving fiscal emergencies and restoring stability; the language is not ambiguous in this regard.
Why Relevant: The bill mandates audits, reporting, and corrective budget amendments, all aimed at uncovering and correcting inefficiencies or mismanagement, which aligns with the goal of evaluating and improving government performance.
Mechanism of Influence: The fiscal administrator's oversight, required access to records, and power to propose and enforce budget amendments are direct procedural mechanisms to identify and remedy inefficiencies.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The focus is specifically on fiscal emergencies, but the corrective actions and oversight mechanisms are clearly designed to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
Legislation ID: 112661
Bill URL: View Bill
SB 59 seeks to amend existing laws related to the Administrative Procedure Act by requiring a statement from the legislative fiscal office regarding the fiscal impact of proposed rules. It establishes that any proposed rule resulting in significant state expenditures or economic impacts must be approved by relevant legislative committees or the governor before taking effect. The bill also clarifies that fiscal impacts accounted for in prior legislation shall not be counted again for proposed rules.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-08 | Sent to the Governor by the Secretary of the Senate on 6/5/2025. |
2025-06-08 | Signed by the Speaker of the House. |
2025-06-04 | Enrolled. Signed by the President of the Senate. |
2025-06-03 | Amendments proposed by the House read and concurred in by a vote of 37 yeas and 0 nays. |
2025-06-02 | Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 98, nays 0. Finally passed, ordered to the Senate. |
2025-06-02 | Received from the House with amendments. |
2025-05-28 | Scheduled for floor debate on 06/02/2025. |
2025-05-28 | Scheduled for floor debate on 05/29/2025. |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes procedural safeguards (fiscal impact statements, oversight committee/governor approval) specifically aimed at ensuring that new administrative rules do not create unnecessary or duplicative financial burdens on the state. This directly relates to improving government efficiency by scrutinizing potential costs and impacts of regulatory actions.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring fiscal impact statements and higher-level approval for costly rules, the bill introduces a structural mechanism to control expenditures, prevent redundant spending, and improve oversight of regulatory actions—key elements of efficient government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's language is clear in requiring fiscal impact review and oversight for significant rules; however, 'significant economic impact' is defined by a monetary threshold, which is concrete. The efficiency goal is implicit in the focus on fiscal scrutiny and oversight.
Legislation ID: 38951
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill seeks to establish a framework for auditing all state agencies in Maine. By mandating audits, the bill aims to improve oversight and ensure that state resources are being used efficiently and effectively. The amendment incorporates a fiscal note, indicating the financial implications of the proposed audits.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-03 | Accepted Report |
2025-06-02 | Accepted Report |
2025-02-19 | Referred to Committee |
2025-02-19 | Referred in Concurrence |
Why Relevant: The bill's primary purpose is to audit state agencies to improve oversight and ensure resources are used efficiently and effectively, which directly aligns with the goal of promoting government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular audits, the bill creates a structural mechanism to evaluate government performance, potentially uncover inefficiencies, and recommend improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
This bill proposes the establishment of a Behavioral Science Insights Policy Directive within the Massachusetts General Laws. It encourages administrative and independent agencies to identify and apply behavioral science insights to improve the outcomes of public programs. The directive emphasizes the importance of streamlining processes, improving information presentation, and reducing regulatory burdens to facilitate better access to public benefits and services.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-27 | Referred to the committee onState Administration and Regulatory Oversight |
2025-02-27 | House concurred |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to improve government efficiency and effectiveness by streamlining processes, reducing regulatory burdens, and enhancing the delivery of public programs through behavioral science insights.
Mechanism of Influence: It sets up a policy directive that requires agencies to review and improve their operations, encourages collaboration with researchers, and mandates the evaluation of interventions aimed at reducing administrative hurdles and regulatory inefficiencies.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill uses language like 'encourages' rather than 'requires' in some sections, it does set clear expectations for agencies to pursue efficiency and effectiveness goals. The intent to promote government efficiency is explicit throughout.
Legislation ID: 86875
Bill URL: View Bill
Bill S.2137 seeks to repeal specific sections of chapter 7 of the General Laws, which may be contributing to unnecessary government expenditures. By eliminating these sections, the bill intends to streamline government operations and facilitate the creation of new job opportunities.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-07-12 | Hearing scheduled for 07/22/2025 from 10:00 AM-01:00 PM in A-1 |
2025-02-27 | Referred to the committee onState Administration and Regulatory Oversight |
2025-02-27 | House concurred |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly states its goal is to streamline government operations and reduce unnecessary expenditures, which aligns directly with efforts to improve government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By repealing specific statutory provisions, the bill aims to eliminate processes or requirements that may be causing inefficiency or excess cost within government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The summary does not detail what Sections 52 to 56 entail, so the exact nature of the inefficiencies or expenditures being addressed is unclear. However, the stated purpose is clear.
Legislation ID: 88765
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill proposes the development and adoption of a zero-based budget for each state agency and department on a quadrennial basis. The zero-based budget will start from a zero dollar amount and will be based on the cost-effective performance necessary to achieve the agencys goals and objectives. It requires public hearings and evaluations by the relevant legislative committees to ensure thorough scrutiny and transparency in the budgeting process.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-27 | Referred to the committee onState Administration and Regulatory Oversight |
2025-02-27 | House concurred |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes a structural mechanism (zero-based budgeting) designed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations by requiring agencies to justify all spending and link it to performance outcomes. It also mandates oversight and evaluation by legislative committees.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agencies to start from zero in their budget justifications and tying appropriations to performance measures, the bill aims to eliminate waste, reduce unnecessary spending, and ensure that government funds are used efficiently. The involvement of legislative committees and public hearings enhances scrutiny and transparency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's language is clear in its intent to promote efficiency through zero-based budgeting and performance evaluation. There is little ambiguity about its purpose or mechanism.
Legislation ID: 86760
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill proposes an amendment to Section 6B of chapter 159B of the General Laws of Massachusetts. The amendment involves the removal of the fifth paragraph from the existing legislation, which is intended to alleviate unnecessary administrative requirements that may hinder operations within government and industry.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-30 | Hearing scheduled for 05/06/2025 from 11:00 AM-01:00 PM in A-2 |
2025-02-27 | Referred to the committee onTelecommunications, Utilities and Energy |
2025-02-27 | House concurred |
Why Relevant: The bill specifically aims to remove administrative requirements that are seen as unnecessary and burdensome, with the explicit goal of improving operational efficiency within government (and industry).
Mechanism of Influence: By deleting a paragraph that imposes administrative requirements, the bill would directly reduce bureaucratic procedures, potentially lowering administrative burdens and streamlining processes.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The exact content of the fifth paragraph is not provided, so the precise scope of the administrative burden being addressed is unclear. However, the abstract makes the intent clear.
Legislation ID: 74832
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill mandates a reduction in appropriations for state agency operations based on unfilled positions that have not been filled within 180 days of being posted. It applies to positions posted in fiscal years 2023, 2024, and 2025, with specific exclusions for law enforcement and public safety positions. Additionally, it requires the commissioner of management and budget to report on the financial impact of these reductions to legislative finance committees.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-12 | Introduction and first reading, referred to State Government Finance and Policy |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to increase government efficiency and reduce costs by mandating budget reductions for prolonged vacancies and requiring reporting on these savings.
Mechanism of Influence: By tying appropriations to actual staffing levels and mandating reports on savings, the bill incentivizes agencies to either fill positions more quickly or reduce unnecessary positions, directly promoting efficient use of resources.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is specific in its method (budget reductions for unfilled positions) and in its reporting requirements. It does not create a new committee or task force, but it does establish a procedural mechanism (mandatory reporting and budget adjustment) to promote efficiency.
Legislation ID: 91080
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill creates a new commission tasked with investigating fraud and conflicts of interest in Minnesotas state government. It outlines the commissions structure, membership, reporting requirements, and the procedures for conducting investigations and forensic audits. The bill also includes provisions for public reporting and rewards for whistleblowers, as well as amendments to existing statutes to ensure compliance and cooperation from state agencies and grantees.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-17 | Introduction and first reading, referred to State Government Finance and Policy |
Why Relevant: The bill creates a permanent commission specifically named the 'Commission on Government Efficiency and Ethics,' with a direct mandate to investigate fraud and conflicts of interest, which are major sources of government inefficiency and waste. The commission's purpose and powers are explicitly tied to promoting government efficiency and ethical conduct.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a specialized entity with investigative and audit powers, the bill provides a structural mechanism for identifying and addressing inefficiencies, waste, and unethical behavior in government operations. The commission's reporting and enforcement provisions are designed to enhance accountability and transparency, which are essential for improving efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill's primary focus is on fraud and conflicts of interest, the explicit naming and funding of the commission for 'efficiency' purposes, as well as its authority to conduct forensic audits and enforce compliance, make its intent and mechanism clear. The scope could be interpreted as primarily anti-fraud, but the inclusion of 'efficiency' in the commission's title and mandate covers the user's criteria.
Legislation ID: 33239
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill creates the SAVI program, which encourages state agencies, including Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, to identify and implement cost-effective measures that result in savings. Agencies can retain a percentage of unspent funds for innovative projects, subject to oversight and approval processes. The bill also amends existing laws to accommodate this program and outlines a peer review process for funding decisions.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-10 | Introduction and first reading, referred to State Government Finance and Policy |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes a program (SAVI) whose mission is to improve government efficiency and reduce costs by encouraging agencies to find and implement savings.
Mechanism of Influence: It creates structural mechanisms (peer review panels, dedicated accounts, oversight by the commissioner) and procedural requirements (posting notices, approvals) to ensure savings are identified, retained, and reinvested in further efficiency projects.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent and mechanisms, with little ambiguity regarding its focus on efficiency and cost-savings.
Legislation ID: 103587
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill outlines the creation and responsibilities of an Office of Inspector General within Minnesotas state government. It includes provisions for the appointment and duties of the inspector general, establishes mechanisms for reporting and investigating fraud and misuse of public funds, and enhances oversight of state grants. The bill also prohibits retaliation against whistleblowers and provides for penalties related to fraud.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-01 | Introduction and first reading, referred to Human Services Finance and Policy |
Why Relevant: The bill creates a permanent government entity (Office of Inspector General) with the explicit mission of investigating fraud, misuse, and inefficiency in the use of public funds, which directly aligns with improving government effectiveness and efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing oversight, investigative, and reporting mechanisms, and mandating coordination with the legislative auditor, the bill seeks to identify waste, prevent fraud, and improve the use of state resources, all of which are structural mechanisms to promote government efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's focus is specifically on fraud and misuse of public funds, which is a clear and direct subset of government efficiency. There is little ambiguity about its intent to improve effectiveness and reduce waste.
Legislation ID: 33521
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends existing Minnesota statutes to mandate that the legislative auditor submits an annual report detailing the implementation status of audit recommendations by state agencies. Additionally, it requires the commissioner to review audit reports and report on the status of recommendations, thereby ensuring that internal control issues are addressed effectively.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-06 | Introduction and first reading, referred to State Government Finance and Policy |
Why Relevant: The bill creates a recurring structural mechanism (annual reporting and required hearings) specifically aimed at improving government effectiveness and efficiency by ensuring audit recommendations are implemented.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating follow-up reporting and public hearings on audit recommendations, the bill increases oversight and pressure on agencies to address inefficiencies, correct internal control problems, and justify inaction, thus promoting more effective and efficient government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit that its purpose is to improve the implementation of audit recommendations, which are typically aimed at correcting inefficiencies or control weaknesses. However, it does not specify the types of recommendations, so the scope could be broad.
Legislation ID: 30111
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends Minnesota Statutes to require the Minnesota Management and Budget commissioner to provide a detailed annual report on agency actions in response to recommendations made by the Legislative Auditor. The report must include descriptions of actions taken, assessments of completion, explanations for any incomplete actions, necessary work for completion, and timelines for addressing concerns raised by the auditor.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-24 | Introduction and first reading |
Why Relevant: The bill directly mandates a structural mechanism (annual reporting) focused on evaluating and improving agency responses to audit recommendations, which is explicitly intended to promote government efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring public, detailed reports on how agencies address audit findings, the bill increases accountability, encourages timely and thorough corrective actions, and supports ongoing improvements in government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill’s language is specific in tying the reporting requirement to the purpose of responding to efficiency-related recommendations from the Legislative Auditor.
Legislation ID: 90511
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill establishes a Commission on Government Efficiency and Ethics within the state of Minnesota, tasked with investigating fraud in state programs and undisclosed conflicts of interest among legislators. The commission will be composed of six citizen members appointed by legislative leaders, will have the authority to conduct investigations and forensic audits, and will report findings to relevant authorities. It also includes provisions for public reporting and potential rewards for whistleblowers, as well as funding appropriations to support its operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-24 | Referred to State and Local Government |
2025-03-24 | Introduction and first reading |
Why Relevant: The bill directly creates a commission whose explicit mission is to improve government efficiency by investigating fraud and identifying inefficiencies in state programs.
Mechanism of Influence: The commission is empowered to conduct forensic audits and investigations, require cooperation from public officials, and recommend corrective actions. Mandated reporting and audit clauses in grants further institutionalize efficiency and oversight.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent to promote efficiency and ethics; there is little ambiguity regarding its focus on improving government operations.
Legislation ID: 31348
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill mandates a reduction in appropriations for state agencies based on salary and benefits savings from positions that have not been filled for at least 12 months. It applies to positions posted in fiscal years 2025, 2026, and 2027, and requires reporting on the financial impact of these reductions. The bill exempts law enforcement positions from these provisions.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-27 | Introduction and first reading |
Why Relevant: The bill directly aims to improve government efficiency by eliminating unused salary expenditures and requiring reporting on the resulting savings.
Mechanism of Influence: By removing appropriations for persistently vacant positions, the bill incentivizes agencies to either fill necessary roles or streamline operations, reducing waste. The reporting requirement ensures oversight and transparency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent to reduce costs by targeting unfilled positions, and the reporting mechanism is clearly outlined. The only ambiguity is how agencies might respond—by consolidating duties or possibly shifting workloads.
Legislation ID: 150667
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill No. 21 seeks to amend various sections of the Mississippi Code to redefine terms related to public purchasing, particularly focusing on the definition of lowest and best bids. The bill emphasizes the inclusion of life cycle costing, warranties, and other relevant considerations in the evaluation of bids. Additionally, it aims to bring forward several sections of the code for potential amendments, ensuring a comprehensive update to public procurement practices in the state.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-04 | (H) Died In Committee |
2025-01-10 | (H) Referred To State Affairs |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations by modernizing procurement practices and requiring a more comprehensive evaluation of bids.
Mechanism of Influence: By redefining 'lowest and best' to include life cycle and operational costs, the bill encourages government entities to select bids that may provide greater long-term value and cost savings, rather than simply the lowest upfront price. This can reduce waste and improve resource allocation.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not create a new entity or require a study, audit, or report, but it does establish a procedural mechanism (life cycle analysis in bid evaluation) that is designed to make government purchasing more efficient.
House Bill No. 924, known as the Transparency in Government Act, seeks to establish a framework for reviewing newly adopted state agency administrative rules for compliance with legislative intent. It mandates the State Department of Education to collect data regarding technology in schools and improve planning for school nutrition and transportation services. The bill also proposes the formation of a State Board of Health Professions to oversee health care regulations and ensure efficient operations. Additionally, it includes provisions for Medicaid nonemergency transportation evaluations, penalties for noncompliance with committee subpoenas, and the establishment of a self-insurance task force.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-24 | Vetoed |
2025-04-08 | (S) Enrolled Bill Signed |
2025-04-08 | (H) Enrolled Bill Signed |
2025-04-02 | (H) Motion to Reconsider Tabled |
2025-04-01 | (S) Conference Report Adopted |
2025-04-01 | (H) Conference Report Adopted |
2025-04-01 | (H) Motion to Reconsider Entered (Ford (54th), Porter) |
2025-03-31 | (S) Reconsidered |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes or restructures several entities (State Board of Health Professions, self-insurance task force, PEER Committee review authority) specifically to evaluate, coordinate, and improve government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: Creates new boards and task forces with explicit mandates to oversee, evaluate, and recommend improvements in regulatory, health, insurance, and administrative processes.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is explicit in assigning efficiency, coordination, and evaluation roles to these entities, reducing ambiguity about their purpose.
Why Relevant: The bill mandates recurring studies, audits, and reports (e.g., triennial Medicaid transportation evaluation, annual review of school accounting procedures, technology surveys) aimed at identifying inefficiencies and improving government performance.
Mechanism of Influence: Requires agencies and committees to conduct audits, performance evaluations, and planning exercises, which are foundational steps in uncovering inefficiencies and implementing improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The purpose of these evaluations and reports is clearly tied to improving efficiency, accountability, and responsiveness, as stated in the bill's descriptions.
Why Relevant: Several provisions focus on streamlining processes and improving inter-agency coordination (e.g., State Board of Health Professions, planning for school nutrition and transportation services, establishing standards for investigations).
Mechanism of Influence: Assigns responsibility for coordination, standard-setting, and planning to specific agencies or newly created boards, which is a direct mechanism for improving process efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: Although some provisions (such as standards for investigations) could be interpreted as compliance-focused, the broader context and stated goals relate to efficiency and effective operations.
Legislation ID: 14917
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill No. 958 proposes amendments to several sections of the Mississippi Code related to the Department of Information Technology Services. The amendments focus on eliminating outdated exemptions, revising definitions, and clarifying the powers and duties of the department and state agencies in relation to information technology. Key changes include the removal of certain procurement requirements, the deletion of the requirement for public procurement review board involvement, and the establishment of clearer guidelines for technology acquisitions by state agencies.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-17 | Approved by Governor |
2025-04-07 | (S) Enrolled Bill Signed |
2025-04-07 | (H) Enrolled Bill Signed |
2025-04-02 | (H) Motion to Reconsider Tabled |
2025-04-01 | (S) Conference Report Adopted |
2025-04-01 | (H) Conference Report Adopted |
2025-04-01 | (H) Motion to Reconsider Entered (Zuber, Johnson) |
2025-03-31 | (S) Conference Report Filed |
Why Relevant: The bill specifically aims to clarify and streamline the IT procurement and management process for state agencies, removing unnecessary procedural steps and external board involvement, which are classic examples of efforts to improve government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By eliminating redundant oversight and outdated exemptions, the bill reduces bureaucratic overhead, expedites decision-making, and enables more direct and efficient management of IT resources. The explicit mention of 'efficient acquisition and utilization of information technology' directly aligns with the goal of making government operations more effective and less costly.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill does not create a new body or mandate a study, it restructures existing processes and clarifies responsibilities to promote efficiency. The focus is clearly on procedural and structural streamlining within a key government function (IT).
Legislation ID: 15890
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill No. 2272 establishes the Mississippi Health and Welfare Efficiency Task Force tasked with examining the efficiency of state agencies, streamlining government services, and eliminating duplicative requirements that hinder access to government services for residents. The task force will provide recommendations to the Legislature for improving state government efficiency and is composed of various state agency representatives, legislators, and the Governor.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-04 | (H) Died In Committee |
2025-02-10 | (H) Referred To Accountability, Efficiency, Transparency |
2025-02-07 | (S) Transmitted To House |
2025-02-06 | (S) Passed |
2025-01-29 | (S) Title Suff Do Pass |
2025-01-20 | (S) Referred To Government Structure |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes a task force whose mission is to examine and improve the efficiency of state government operations, streamline services, and eliminate duplicative requirements.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating a formal body composed of key stakeholders, the bill empowers a group to systematically review existing processes, identify inefficiencies, and recommend legislative changes to enhance efficiency and reduce costs.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 15893
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill No. 2275 creates the State Agency Reorganization Task Force, which will conduct a comprehensive study of the executive branchs organization. The task force will include appointments from key state officials and will be required to adhere to open meeting laws. Its goal is to submit recommendations for reorganization by December 1, 2025, thereby enhancing governmental efficiency and reducing duplication of efforts within state agencies.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-04 | (H) Died In Committee |
2025-02-18 | (H) Referred To State Affairs;Accountability, Efficiency, Transparency |
2025-02-17 | (S) Transmitted To House |
2025-02-13 | (S) Committee Substitute Adopted |
2025-02-13 | (S) Passed As Amended |
2025-02-13 | (S) Amended |
2025-02-03 | (S) Title Suff Do Pass Comm Sub |
2025-01-20 | (S) Referred To Government Structure |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly creates a task force whose mission is to study and recommend changes to state agency organization with the stated goals of promoting efficiency and eliminating duplication.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a formal body to conduct a systematic review and requiring a final report with recommendations and proposed legislation, the bill directly creates a structural mechanism for government efficiency improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is clear in its intent to promote efficiency and reduce duplication. The scope is broad but explicitly tied to the stated goals.
Legislation ID: 15995
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill No. 2377 proposes amendments to Section 27-104-7 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, which governs the Public Procurement Review Board. The bill seeks to expand the boards authority in reviewing contracts, particularly regarding purchasing regulations, contract approvals for state facilities, leasing agreements, and set-aside purchases from minority businesses. It also outlines the qualifications for board members and establishes procedures for adopting regulations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-04 | (H) DR - TSDPAA: SA To AC |
2025-03-04 | (H) Died In Committee |
2025-02-17 | (H) Referred To State Affairs;Accountability, Efficiency, Transparency |
2025-02-14 | (S) Transmitted To House |
2025-02-13 | (S) Passed |
2025-02-13 | (S) Committee Substitute Adopted |
2025-01-30 | (S) Title Suff Do Pass Comm Sub |
2025-01-20 | (S) Referred To Accountability, Efficiency, Transparency |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly empowers and restructures a state oversight entity (the Public Procurement Review Board) with the mission to improve the accountability, transparency, and efficiency of government procurement and contracting processes.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring annual reporting, mandating standards for procurement, authorizing internal audits, and establishing procedures for reviewing and justifying contracts (including sole source and emergency contracts), the bill creates structural and procedural mechanisms designed to promote government efficiency and reduce waste.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill does not use the phrase 'government efficiency' verbatim, the entire structure and intent of the provisions—oversight, reporting, process standardization, and audit requirements—are classic mechanisms for increasing efficiency and effectiveness in government operations.
Legislation ID: 106722
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill No. 1083 proposes the creation of a Joint Committee on Government Efficiency, composed of members from both the Senate and House of Representatives. This committee is tasked with reviewing state regulations, budgets, and social services to identify inefficiencies, recommend cost reductions, and ensure effective use of state resources. The committee will also be responsible for submitting reports on its findings and recommendations, with certain recommendations automatically taking effect unless disapproved by the General Assembly or the Governor.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-29 | Read Second Time (H) |
2025-01-28 | Introduced and Read First Time (H) |
Why Relevant: This bill directly establishes a legislative entity tasked with improving government efficiency through the identification of inefficiencies, cost-saving recommendations, and process improvements.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating a joint committee with the authority to review regulations, budgets, and social services, and to submit actionable recommendations (some of which take effect automatically), the bill sets up a structural mechanism to drive efficiency and cost savings in government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill requires regular reporting on findings and recommendations related to government efficiency, which aligns with mandates for studies or evaluations aimed at improving effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: Mandated reports and findings provide transparency and accountability, and inform legislative and executive decision-making regarding efficiency initiatives.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The establishment of a Government Efficiency Fund to collect and utilize savings from efficiency recommendations is a structural mechanism to incentivize and track cost reductions.
Mechanism of Influence: This fund ensures that identified savings are captured and used specifically for efficiency purposes, reinforcing the bill's focus on government effectiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 106313
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends chapter 34 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri by adding a new section that mandates performance audits for economy and efficiency to be conducted at least once every four years on various state departments and offices. The bill outlines the process for selecting independent auditors, the requirement for entities to publish audit results, and the consequences for non-compliance with audit participation.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-11 | Public Hearing Completed (H) |
2025-01-22 | Referred: Government Efficiency(H) |
2025-01-15 | Read Second Time (H) |
2025-01-14 | Introduced and Read First Time (H) |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a recurring mechanism (performance audits) designed to evaluate and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating independent performance audits focused on economy and efficiency, the bill creates a procedural tool to identify cost-saving opportunities, reduce waste, and ensure government entities operate effectively. The required public reporting and legislative submission of results further promote accountability and transparency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 214399
Bill URL: View Bill
This resolution proposes changes to Senate Rules 25 and 28, specifically altering the membership numbers of several standing committees, renaming some committees, and clarifying the duties of each committee. The amendments aim to improve the efficiency and functionality of the Senates operations by adjusting committee sizes and responsibilities to better reflect current legislative needs.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-15 | S adopted |
2025-01-14 | S offered |
Why Relevant: The resolution explicitly aims to improve the efficiency and functionality of Senate operations by realigning committee structures and responsibilities. Renaming a committee to 'Government Efficiency' and clarifying duties directly aligns with efforts to promote government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By restructuring committees, adjusting their sizes, and clarifying their mandates, the resolution seeks to streamline legislative workflows, reduce overlap, and focus committee efforts. The renaming to 'Government Efficiency' signals a mission focused on efficiency improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the resolution claims to improve efficiency, it does not establish new bodies or mandate specific studies, audits, or process changes. The main mechanism is organizational restructuring rather than the creation of new efficiency initiatives.
Legislation ID: 214248
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill establishes a Palliative Care Consumer and Professional Information and Education Program within the Department of Health and Senior Services. It mandates the creation of a council to advise on palliative care initiatives, requiring regular meetings, annual reporting on care availability, and barriers to access. The bill also outlines the responsibilities of the council and the implementation of educational resources for healthcare providers and the public.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-02 | SCS Voted Do Pass S Government Efficiency Committee (2955S.02C) |
2025-03-31 | Hearing Conducted S Government Efficiency Committee |
2025-03-27 | Second Read and Referred S Government Efficiency Committee |
2025-02-25 | S First Read |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes several structural entities (councils, committees, task forces, commissions) with mandates to study, report, and make recommendations on specific government services and programs. Some provisions require reports on program effectiveness, barriers, and sustainability, and include recommendations to the legislature and governor.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating advisory and oversight bodies, mandating reports, and requiring evaluations of program effectiveness, the bill introduces procedural mechanisms that can potentially improve government operations in the targeted areas (e.g., healthcare, corrections, child welfare). These mechanisms are designed to provide data, identify inefficiencies, and recommend improvements, which aligns with government efficiency goals.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While many of the established bodies are focused on improving specific services (palliative care, trauma-informed care, etc.), only some explicitly mention evaluating government performance or recommending improvements. The overall purpose is more about service improvement than broad government efficiency, but the reporting and advisory components do touch on efficiency within their domains.
House Bill 692 amends Section 2-12-104 of the Montana Code Annotated (MCA) to mandate that each state department produces an annual plan by September 1, 2023, and subsequently every two years. The plans must include descriptions of departmental functions, program-level initiatives, and specific performance measures to track progress and outcomes, which must be accessible to the public on departmental websites.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-16 | Chapter Number Assigned |
2025-05-12 | (H) Signed by Governor |
2025-05-05 | (H) Transmitted to Governor |
2025-05-02 | (S) Signed by President |
2025-05-01 | (H) Signed by Speaker |
2025-04-28 | (H) Returned from Enrolling |
2025-04-24 | (S) Scheduled for 3rd Reading |
2025-04-24 | (S) 3rd Reading Concurred |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes a structural mechanism (mandatory planning and reporting) designed to improve government efficiency and effectiveness by requiring departments to track and publicly report measurable outcomes and initiatives.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular planning, performance measurement, and public reporting, the bill seeks to increase transparency, facilitate accountability, and enable more informed oversight and decision-making, which are direct methods of promoting efficiency and responsiveness in government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not explicitly state 'to promote efficiency,' but the requirement for performance measures, outcome tracking, and publication is a standard approach aimed at improving efficiency and effectiveness in government.
Legislation ID: 170825
Bill URL: View Bill
HB 834 establishes a commission tasked with developing a cohesive system for collecting and integrating data to inform policymakers about the effectiveness of state programs. It outlines the commissions membership, duties, and operational framework, including funding provisions and a timeline for meetings and activities.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-19 | Chapter Number Assigned |
2025-05-07 | (H) Transmitted to Governor |
2025-05-06 | (S) Signed by President |
2025-05-02 | (H) Signed by Speaker |
2025-04-29 | (H) Returned from Enrolling |
2025-04-28 | (H) Sent to Enrolling |
2025-04-25 | (H) 3rd Reading Passed as Amended by Senate |
2025-04-25 | (H) Scheduled for 3rd Reading |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes a commission whose primary mission is to improve government efficiency by identifying inefficiencies and redundancies, enhancing oversight, and recommending improvements based on data analysis.
Mechanism of Influence: The commission is empowered to collect and analyze data on state programs, review legislative oversight structures, and report on opportunities for cost savings and improved efficiency. By identifying inefficiencies and redundancies, the commission can recommend structural or procedural changes to streamline government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent to improve government efficiency, as it repeatedly references the identification of inefficiencies and redundant programs. The scope is tied to data-driven evaluation, which is a common mechanism for efficiency improvement.
Legislation ID: 159621
Bill URL: View Bill
This legislative resolution seeks to initiate an interim study by the Government, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee to evaluate the costs associated with the adoption, amendment, or repeal of rules and regulations affecting persons and businesses in Nebraska. The study will utilize fiscal impact statements and other financial data to analyze the implications of selected regulatory changes made in the years 2023 and 2024.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-08-06 | Notice of hearing for October 03, 2025 |
2025-05-19 | Referred to Government, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee |
2025-05-07 | Referred to Executive Board |
2025-05-07 | Date of introduction |
Why Relevant: The resolution explicitly establishes a formal study by a legislative committee to assess the financial impact of regulatory changes, with the intent to inform potential improvements in government efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring a systematic review and financial analysis of regulatory changes, the measure aims to uncover inefficiencies, unnecessary costs, or burdensome regulations. The resulting report and recommendations could lead to more efficient regulatory practices or reforms.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the resolution does not mandate specific efficiency reforms, the explicit purpose of the study is to evaluate regulatory costs, which is directly related to promoting government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 121961
Bill URL: View Bill
This legislation updates the procedures and responsibilities of the Legislative Performance Audit Committee, ensuring that state agencies are audited on a regular five-year schedule and clarifying the steps for conducting performance audits, including notification processes and the development of audit plans.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-03 | Notice of hearing for March 04, 2025 |
2025-01-15 | Referred to Executive Board |
2025-01-13 | Date of introduction |
Why Relevant: The bill specifically establishes and clarifies procedural mechanisms for conducting regular performance audits of state agencies with the explicit purpose of evaluating and improving government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring all state agencies to be audited on a five-year schedule and setting out clear steps for audit planning and execution, the bill institutionalizes ongoing evaluation of government performance, which is directly aimed at identifying inefficiencies, redundancies, and areas for improvement.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not explicitly state that the sole purpose of the audits is to promote efficiency; however, performance audits by definition are typically intended to improve efficiency and effectiveness. The committee's mission is presumed to include these goals, but the text provided does not quote explicit language to that effect.
Legislation ID: 122168
Bill URL: View Bill
Legislative Bill 228 seeks to amend various sections of the Legislative Performance Audit Act to redefine key terms, update obsolete provisions, and modify requirements for conducting performance audits on tax incentive programs. The bill also addresses the handling of documents that are exempt from public records requests, thereby enhancing the auditing process and accountability of government entities in Nebraska.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-06 | Provisions/portions ofLB228amended intoLB298byAM1504 |
2025-06-02 | Indefinitely postponed |
2025-06-02 | Motion to suspend rules to indefinitely postpone filed |
2025-06-02 | Motion to suspend rules to indefinitely postpone prevailed |
2025-06-02 | Motion to suspend rules to indefinitely postpone withdrawn |
2025-05-30 | Motion to suspend rules to indefinitely postpone filed |
2025-03-20 | Placed on General File |
2025-02-03 | Notice of hearing for March 04, 2025 |
Why Relevant: This bill directly establishes and empowers the Legislative Performance Audit Committee, a body tasked with conducting performance audits of government agencies and tax incentive programs to promote efficiency and accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular performance audits, requiring access to agency records, and structuring the committee's review process, the bill creates procedural mechanisms to identify inefficiencies, evaluate program effectiveness, and recommend improvements or cost savings.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent to improve government accountability and efficiency through structured audits and oversight. There is little ambiguity as the language specifically references performance audits and the purpose of evaluating effectiveness and economic impact.
Legislation ID: 121629
Bill URL: View Bill
LB346 aims to streamline state governance by modifying the structure and responsibilities of numerous boards and commissions within Nebraska. It includes the termination of several advisory councils and boards, such as the Advisory Council for the Private Postsecondary Career School Act and the Nebraska Potato Development Committee, which will cease operations on July 1, 2026. The bill also proposes changes to the Board of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses, the Board of Alcohol and Drug Counseling, and various other entities, while repealing outdated statutes and establishing operative dates for these changes.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-02 | Approved by Governor on May 30, 2025 |
2025-05-28 | Cavanaugh, M.MO305withdrawn |
2025-05-28 | Presented to Governor on May 28, 2025 |
2025-05-28 | Dispensing of reading at large approved |
2025-05-28 | President/Speaker signed |
2025-05-28 | Passed on Final Reading 49-0-0 |
2025-05-28 | Cavanaugh, M.FA290withdrawn |
2025-05-27 | Cavanaugh, M.FA290filed |
Why Relevant: The bill's main thrust is to streamline government by consolidating and eliminating various boards and commissions, which aligns directly with the goal of improving government efficiency and reducing unnecessary bureaucracy.
Mechanism of Influence: By terminating or merging multiple advisory councils and boards, the bill reduces administrative overhead, potential duplication, and operational costs, thereby promoting more efficient government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill does not always explicitly state 'efficiency' as the goal in each section, the overall legislative intent and structural changes (such as terminating or consolidating entities) are classic mechanisms for improving efficiency and effectiveness in government.
Legislation ID: 121616
Bill URL: View Bill
LB634 introduces the Legislative Sunset Review Act, which aims to create a structured process for reviewing state boards, councils, committees, and other entities established by the Legislature. The bill outlines the formation of a Legislative Sunset Review Committee responsible for evaluating these entities every five years, assessing their performance, and making recommendations for their continuation or termination. Additionally, it repeals outdated statutes and sets an operative date for the act.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-14 | Executive Board priority bill |
2025-02-03 | Notice of hearing for March 06, 2025 |
2025-01-24 | Referred to Executive Board |
2025-01-22 | Date of introduction |
Why Relevant: The bill's explicit purpose is to improve government efficiency by systematically reviewing the necessity, performance, and cost-effectiveness of state entities, with the goal of eliminating, consolidating, or restructuring those that are outdated, duplicative, or inefficient.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a recurring, structured review process and empowering a legislative committee to recommend statutory changes, the bill creates a mechanism to reduce administrative burdens, uncover inefficiencies, and ensure government entities are only continued if they serve a demonstrated public need efficiently.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent and mechanisms, directly tying the reviews and recommendations to government efficiency and effectiveness. The exact criteria for 'public need' and 'effectiveness' may be subject to interpretation by the committee, but the overall purpose is unambiguous.
Legislation ID: 200805
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill proposes amendments to several sections of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS), specifically focusing on the roles and responsibilities of state agencies in maintaining internal controls and reporting on financial accountability. It introduces the Inspector Generals role and outlines the reporting requirements for agencies regarding their internal accounting systems, as well as the annual accountability reports for school districts and other entities.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-12 | (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.) |
2025-02-09 | Notice of eligibility for exemption. |
2025-02-04 | Read first time. To committee. |
2024-11-19 | From printer. |
2024-11-15 | Prefiled. Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. To printer. |
Why Relevant: The bill creates a new Inspector General role specifically tasked with overseeing and investigating financial accountability within state agencies, which is a structural mechanism designed to improve government efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: The Inspector General will have the authority to examine agency processes, uncover inefficiencies, and recommend improvements, directly targeting cost savings and improved performance.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill requires agencies to periodically review and report on their internal accounting and administrative controls to ensure compliance and efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: Mandated reviews and reports serve as procedural mechanisms to identify inefficiencies, duplications, or non-compliance, prompting corrective action.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The annual accountability and financial reports for school districts and the State Permanent School Fund are intended to increase transparency and oversight, which are key components of government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: Requiring detailed, accessible, and periodic reports compels agencies and districts to monitor their operations and financials, potentially revealing areas for cost savings or process improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill details reporting requirements for school districts regarding personnel, expenditures, and salaries, explicitly to ensure accountability in educational funding.
Mechanism of Influence: Detailed reporting can uncover inefficiencies, duplicative spending, or misallocation of resources, providing data for streamlining and improved responsiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 201220
Bill URL: View Bill
Assembly Bill No. 442 revises provisions related to grants by requiring state grant-making entities to process payments to private nonprofit corporations within 30 calendar days of receiving a proper invoice. The bill also imposes interest on late payments and allows for advances on grants to facilitate quicker execution of grant-funded activities. It defines key terms, outlines the responsibilities of state entities regarding invoice processing, and sets conditions for requesting advance payments.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-11 | Chapter 474. |
2025-06-10 | Approved by the Governor. |
2025-06-06 | Enrolled and delivered to Governor. |
2025-06-04 | To Assembly. In Assembly. To enrollment. |
2025-06-02 | Read third time. Passed, as amended. Title approved, as amended. (Yeas: 20, Nays: None, Excused: 1.) |
2025-06-01 | Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day. |
2025-05-31 | Taken from General File. Placed on General File for next legislative day. |
2025-05-30 | From committee: Do pass. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. |
Why Relevant: The bill directly seeks to streamline and improve the efficiency of government operations related to grant administration, specifically by reducing payment processing times, imposing penalties for delays, and enabling advance payments to facilitate faster project execution.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring faster payment processing and penalizing delays, the bill incentivizes state agencies to improve their administrative procedures. The advance payment provisions and mandatory reporting introduce mechanisms for greater oversight, transparency, and responsiveness in grant management.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is focused on the efficiency of grant payment processes rather than broader government operations. However, it explicitly states its intent to facilitate quicker execution of grant-funded activities by improving state administrative processes.
Legislation ID: 201335
Bill URL: View Bill
The bill outlines the operational framework for state-sponsored programs aimed at employing offenders. It mandates that these programs must generate profits for the Department, specifies requirements for contracts with private employers, and establishes reporting obligations for the performance of these programs. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of vocational training and the conditions under which offenders may be employed or trained outside of correctional facilities.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-30 | Approved by the Governor. Chapter 153. |
2025-05-27 | Enrolled and delivered to Governor. |
2025-05-22 | In Assembly. To enrollment. |
2025-05-21 | Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 17, Nays: 4.) To Assembly. |
2025-05-19 | From committee: Do pass. Placed on Second Reading File. Read second time. |
2025-05-11 | Notice of exemption. |
2025-04-17 | In Senate. Read first time. Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. To committee. |
2025-04-16 | Read third time. Passed. Title approved. (Yeas: 42, Nays: None.) To Senate. |
Why Relevant: This provision creates the Legislative Bureau of Educational Accountability to analyze and report on educational effectiveness and accountability, and to conduct studies as requested by the Legislature. Its explicit mission is to evaluate and improve government performance in education.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a bureau dedicated to studying and reporting on educational accountability, the bill sets up a structural mechanism for ongoing evaluation and potential improvement of government operations in the education sector.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill outlines an employee suggestion process for state employees to submit ideas for improvements, requiring agencies to report on findings and the board to evaluate and monitor adopted suggestions. This is a formal mechanism to solicit and implement efficiency improvements.
Mechanism of Influence: This process institutionalizes a feedback loop for operational improvements, which can lead to cost savings and streamlined processes if suggestions are adopted.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill requires local governments to report annually on the status and savings from performance contracts, which is a direct measure to evaluate government performance and cost savings.
Mechanism of Influence: Mandated annual reporting on performance contracts provides oversight and transparency, helping to ensure that such contracts achieve intended savings and efficiency gains.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 45420
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill creates a New Jersey Delegation on Government Efficiency (DOGE) under the Department of the Treasury to assess state government functions aimed at identifying cost-saving measures and improving operational efficiency. The DOGE will consist of a chairperson and up to 20 public members appointed by a selection committee, and it will report its findings and recommendations to the Governor and Legislature within 20 months of its first meeting.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-30 | Introduced, Referred to Assembly State and Local Government Committee |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly creates a new entity (DOGE) with the specific mission to identify cost-saving measures and improve operational efficiency in state government.
Mechanism of Influence: DOGE is empowered to examine government functions, identify inefficiencies, and recommend improvements, directly targeting government efficiency and effectiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 44980
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill mandates the creation of a public awareness campaign and a call center to assist residents with property tax relief programs. It seeks to inform homeowners and tenants about various available programs, their eligibility, and the application process. Additionally, it requires the Stay NJ Task Force to provide annual reports on the administration of these programs, ensuring accountability and transparency in property tax relief efforts.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-10 | Introduced, Referred to Assembly State and Local Government Committee |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes and empowers the Stay NJ Task Force to provide annual reports with recommendations for improvements, which is a procedural mechanism aimed at evaluating and potentially enhancing the administration of government programs.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring annual reporting and recommendations for improvement, the bill introduces a feedback loop that can identify inefficiencies, duplications, or administrative burdens in property tax relief programs, with the explicit goal of improving their administration.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill requires the Task Force to recommend improvements, it does not explicitly state that government efficiency is the primary goal; the focus is on accountability and transparency in property tax relief. However, the reporting and recommendation requirement could lead to efficiency gains.
Legislation ID: 45011
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill requires the Director of the Division of Local Government Services to create a grant program for local government units to hire consultants for efficiency reviews. The program is designed to streamline operations and reduce costs, with a total appropriation of $1.5 million to support these efforts.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-13 | Introduced, Referred to Assembly State and Local Government Committee |
Why Relevant: The bill directly targets government efficiency by funding external reviews specifically aimed at streamlining operations and reducing costs in local government units.
Mechanism of Influence: It empowers local governments to contract with professional consultants for efficiency reviews, with explicit requirements for reporting on cost savings and service improvements, thereby institutionalizing a process for identifying and implementing efficiency measures.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent and structure; the only ambiguity is in how 'efficiency reviews' are defined in practice, but the goal of improving efficiency is explicit.
Legislation ID: 45077
Bill URL: View Bill
This legislation creates an initiative managed by the Office of the State Comptroller that allows state employees to report perceived waste, fraud, or inefficiencies within state government operations. Upon validation of these reports, the Comptroller will work with relevant departments to devise corrective measures, with a financial incentive provided to employees who report valid claims based on the savings achieved.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-27 | Introduced, Referred to Assembly State and Local Government Committee |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to improve government efficiency by identifying and eliminating waste, fraud, and inefficiency through a structured reporting and corrective process.
Mechanism of Influence: It empowers the Office of the State Comptroller to investigate inefficiencies and mandates inter-departmental cooperation for corrective action. Financial incentives motivate employees to participate, directly tying the initiative to cost savings and efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 49989
Bill URL: View Bill
This resolution establishes a New Jersey Government Efficiency Commission tasked with investigating and implementing strategies to streamline government functions, reduce unnecessary bureaucracy, and find opportunities for cost savings. The commission will consist of seven members, including the State Treasurer and various public appointees, and will report its findings and recommendations to the Governor and Legislature annually.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-30 | Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate State Government, Wagering, Tourism & Historic Preservation Committee |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a commission with the explicit mission of improving government efficiency, streamlining operations, and reducing costs.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating a dedicated entity with investigative and reporting duties focused on government efficiency, the bill sets up a structural mechanism for ongoing evaluation and reform of government processes.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 49606
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill mandates the Division of Purchase and Property in New Jersey to compile an inventory of underutilized real property owned by the state. It requires an analysis of the feasibility of developing these properties for various uses, including housing for low-income individuals and services for the homeless. The division will submit an annual report detailing its findings and recommendations to the Governor and the Legislature, ensuring transparency and ongoing evaluation of state property utilization.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-03 | Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Community and Urban Affairs Committee |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes a mandated, recurring evaluation (inventory and analysis) of state-owned real property with the explicit aim of identifying underutilized assets and recommending more effective uses. This is a mechanism designed to improve the efficiency of government asset management.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring the Division to systematically identify and assess underused properties, the bill creates a process for uncovering inefficiencies and potentially reducing waste or administrative costs associated with idle assets. The consultation with other agencies and required reporting further supports oversight and transparent decision-making.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill's primary focus is on property utilization for housing and social services, the requirement for inventory and feasibility analysis, and the mandate to report findings and recommendations, directly target government efficiency in asset management.
Legislation ID: 49618
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill requires the Director of the Division of Local Government Services in the Department of Community Affairs to create a grant program that allows local government units to hire management enhancement review consultants. The goal is to conduct efficiency reviews that streamline operations and reduce costs. The program will allocate $1.5 million in grants, with specific maximum amounts for county and municipal units, and requires a 25% local match for grant recipients.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-13 | Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Community and Urban Affairs Committee |
Why Relevant: The bill's explicit goal is to improve government efficiency and reduce costs by funding external reviews of local government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: It creates a structural mechanism (a grant program) that enables local governments to contract professionals for efficiency reviews, with mandated reporting on outcomes related to cost savings and operational improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
House Bill 276 introduces the Public-Private Partnership Fund and Program, which will facilitate collaboration between public entities and private partners to develop broadband and transportation infrastructure. The bill mandates the Local Government Division to provide grants for these projects and includes provisions for rulemaking, fund management, and exemptions from standard procurement codes to expedite project completion.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-12 | HTPWC: Reported by committee with Do Pass recommendation |
2025-02-05 | Sent to HTPWC - Referrals: HTPWC/HAFC |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes new administrative mechanisms (fund, program, oversight processes) and requires cost-benefit analyses and financial risk evaluations, all explicitly aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations in infrastructure project delivery.
Mechanism of Influence: By exempting projects from standard procurement codes, mandating cost-benefit analyses, and instituting financial oversight, the bill streamlines bureaucratic processes and aims to reduce project costs and delays. The creation of a dedicated fund and structured grant process further centralizes and modernizes project administration.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill is focused on infrastructure, the provisions for cost-effectiveness evaluation, financial risk assessment, and streamlined processes are directly tied to government efficiency. The language is explicit about these goals.
House Bill 358 establishes the Interim Administrative Rule Oversight Committee, which is tasked with reviewing proposed rules from executive agencies. The committee will assess the fiscal impacts of these rules and make recommendations accordingly. It also requires that any proposed rule with an estimated cost exceeding one million dollars includes a fiscal impact statement. The bill outlines the committees structure, duties, and the process for rule review, along with the appropriation of funds to support the committees operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-11 | Sent to HGEIC - Referrals: HGEIC/HAFC |
Why Relevant: The bill directly creates a committee whose explicit mission is to review administrative rules for fiscal impact and efficiency, aiming to improve government operations by identifying costly or inefficient rules.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring fiscal impact statements and empowering the committee to recommend changes or the repeal of rules, the bill creates a structural mechanism for ongoing oversight and potential streamlining of government regulation and administrative processes.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent to review rules for fiscal impact and efficiency, leaving little ambiguity about its relevance to government efficiency. However, the degree to which the committee's recommendations will be implemented depends on legislative follow-up.
Senate Bill 484 enacts the Government Accountability to Taxpayer Act, creating an office dedicated to overseeing state agency performance, recommending improvements, and ensuring fiscal responsibility. The bill outlines the powers and responsibilities of the executive director of this office, including conducting audits and reporting on state fiscal health.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-20 | Sent to SRC - Referrals: SRC/SFC |
Why Relevant: The bill creates a permanent office specifically charged with improving government efficiency and fiscal responsibility. It mandates performance audits and annual reports focused on administrative efficiency, directly aligning with the criteria for structural and procedural mechanisms to make government operations more effective and less costly.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing an office with the explicit mission to audit agencies, recommend improvements, and report on efficiency, the bill institutionalizes ongoing evaluation and reform of government operations. The executive director's authority ensures sustained focus on streamlining processes and reducing waste.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's description is clear in its intent and mechanisms, with little ambiguity regarding its focus on efficiency and oversight.
Legislation ID: 54020
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends the State Administrative Procedure Act to require state agencies to provide comprehensive assessments of the costs and benefits of proposed rules in their regulatory impact statements. It mandates that agencies consider public comments, especially those that present differing estimates of costs or benefits, and include these in their assessments. The bill also stipulates that agencies provide detailed analyses of the anticipated impacts of rules, including economic, health, safety, and environmental effects.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-08 | referred to governmental operations |
Why Relevant: The bill directly aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations by mandating more rigorous, transparent regulatory impact assessments and the consideration of cost-saving alternatives in rulemaking.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agencies to comprehensively analyze and publicly justify the costs, benefits, and alternatives of proposed regulations, the bill is designed to prevent unnecessary or overly burdensome rules, reduce administrative costs, and enhance the responsiveness and accountability of government rulemaking.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill does not create a new entity or mandate a study group, it does impose procedural mechanisms across all agencies to assess and justify rules for efficiency and effectiveness. Its explicit focus on cost-benefit analysis and consideration of alternatives ties it directly to government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 60149
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends the legislative law to create the Legislative Sunset Advisory Commission, tasked with reviewing state agencies every ten years to determine their effectiveness, efficiency, and necessity. The commission will make recommendations on whether agencies should be continued, reformed, or abolished based on various criteria, including their operational effectiveness and public need.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-04 | referred to governmental operations |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly creates a commission whose mission is to review government agencies for efficiency, effectiveness, and necessity, and to recommend structural changes including consolidation or elimination.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating periodic reviews and recommendations on agency performance, the commission is a direct structural mechanism for promoting government efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is clear in stating the commission's purpose is to assess efficiency and necessity. The scope is broad but the intent is explicit.
Legislation ID: 61377
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends the state finance law to mandate that state agencies perform cost comparison reviews for consultant services contracts anticipated to exceed one million dollars. The goal is to evaluate whether such services can be provided at a lower cost by state employees, unless specific exceptions apply. Additionally, the bill outlines requirements for developing business plans when cost savings are identified, and mandates transparency by making related documents public records.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-10 | referred to governmental operations |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes a procedural mechanism (cost comparison reviews, business plans, and reporting) explicitly aimed at identifying and implementing cost savings in government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: It creates a structured process for evaluating whether outsourcing or using state employees is more efficient, requires public transparency, and mandates a review of the program's effectiveness, all of which are designed to promote government efficiency and cost reduction.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent and mechanisms, with clear requirements for reviews, plans, and reports focused on efficiency.
Legislation ID: 62499
Bill URL: View Bill
This legislation establishes the Division of Regulatory Review and Economic Growth, tasked with reviewing and recommending changes to state regulations and permit requirements to reduce burdens on businesses and promote economic growth. The division will conduct annual reviews and publish recommendations to streamline regulations, ensuring they are efficient and conducive to business development in New York.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-18 | referred to governmental operations |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a permanent division tasked with reviewing, streamlining, and improving the efficiency of regulatory processes across state agencies, with the explicit goal of reducing administrative burdens and costs.
Mechanism of Influence: The division's annual reviews, recommendations, and required pre-publication review of proposed agency rules are structural mechanisms aimed at making government regulation more efficient and responsive. The division also coordinates with other agencies to implement changes and eliminate duplicative or overly burdensome regulations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The focus is specifically on regulations affecting businesses and economic growth, but the structural mechanisms (annual reviews, oversight, inter-agency coordination, mandated recommendations) are classic government efficiency tools.
Legislation ID: 63533
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill establishes the New York State Commission on Government Efficiency, tasked with reviewing state spending to uncover unnecessary expenses. The commission will consist of eight members appointed by legislative leaders, who will serve two-year terms without compensation. It is responsible for issuing an annual report with findings and recommendations for eliminating wasteful spending.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-20 | held for consideration in governmental operations |
2025-02-26 | referred to governmental operations |
Why Relevant: The bill creates a permanent commission specifically charged with identifying wasteful government spending and recommending actions to eliminate inefficiencies.
Mechanism of Influence: By conducting annual reviews of state spending and issuing recommendations—including proposed legislation—the commission is empowered to directly influence the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 66895
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill proposes the establishment of a grant program under the executive law, allowing the secretary of state to award competitive grants to local governments for the purpose of reducing paper use. The grants will have a maximum limit and require local matching funds. The bill outlines the criteria for eligibility, application, and evaluation of the grants, as well as the potential for these grants to contribute to government efficiency plans.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-08 | REFERRED TO FINANCE |
Why Relevant: The bill's stated purpose is to improve government efficiency by reducing paper use and encouraging digital transformation in local government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By providing grants for digitization and paper reduction, the bill incentivizes local governments to modernize workflows, potentially leading to cost savings, streamlined processes, and reduced administrative burdens.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill directly references contributions to government efficiency plans, leaving little ambiguity about its intent. However, the actual impact on efficiency may depend on implementation and the specific projects funded.
Legislation ID: 99863
Bill URL: View Bill
This legislation creates the New York State Commission on Regulatory Efficiency, tasked with examining existing state regulations, identifying those that are unnecessary or wasteful, and making recommendations for regulatory reform. The commission will consist of eight members appointed by various legislative leaders and will issue annual reports with findings and proposed changes.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-20 | REFERRED TO FINANCE |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a commission whose explicit mission is to improve government efficiency by identifying and recommending the removal of unnecessary or wasteful regulations.
Mechanism of Influence: By examining regulations and issuing annual reports with recommendations, the commission is structured to systematically promote regulatory reform, reduce inefficiencies, and streamline government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is clear in its purpose; the commission's sole focus is on regulatory efficiency. There is little ambiguity about its intent to promote government efficiency.
Senate Bill 376 proposes an increase in funding for the Office of the State Auditor to support personnel expansion, technology upgrades, and enhanced audit capabilities. The bill allocates both nonrecurring and recurring funds for the fiscal years 2025-2026 and 2025-2027, with specific amounts designated for hiring additional staff, improving compensation, and upgrading technology. The State Auditor is required to report on the utilization of these funds and their impact on audit efficiency by the end of 2025.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-24 | Passed 1st Reading |
2025-03-24 | Re-ref Com On Appropriations/Base Budget |
2025-03-24 | Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate |
2025-03-24 | Withdrawn From Com |
2025-03-20 | Filed |
Why Relevant: The bill directly aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations by expanding audit capacity and modernizing technology within the Office of the State Auditor.
Mechanism of Influence: By increasing resources for audits and requiring reporting on the efficiency and outcomes of these audits, the bill establishes procedural mechanisms to evaluate and enhance government performance, reduce waste, and promote accountability.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent to improve audit efficiency and government oversight, leaving little ambiguity regarding its relevance to government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 162528
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill 402 establishes a framework for the adoption of permanent rules by state agencies, particularly those that would result in substantial financial costs. It outlines the conditions under which rules must be ratified by the General Assembly based on their projected financial impact, as well as the voting requirements for agencies when adopting such rules. The bill aims to enhance accountability and transparency in the rule-making process, particularly for rules that could impose significant economic burdens on affected individuals and entities.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-07-29 | Veto Received From House |
2025-07-29 | Placed on Todays Calendar |
2025-07-29 | Veto Overridden |
2025-07-03 | Withdrawn From Cal |
2025-07-03 | Placed On Cal For 07/29/2025 |
2025-06-30 | Placed On Cal For 07/14/2025 |
2025-06-27 | Vetoed 06/27/2025 |
2025-06-27 | Received from the Governor |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes procedural mechanisms (e.g., required fiscal notes, legislative ratification, and higher voting thresholds) specifically to ensure that new agency rules are scrutinized for their financial impact, aiming to prevent inefficient or unnecessarily costly regulations. Its stated purpose is to enhance the efficiency, accountability, and transparency of government rulemaking.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring fiscal analysis, legislative ratification, and stricter voting requirements for expensive rules, the bill directly targets the reduction of unnecessary regulatory burdens and government costs. These mechanisms are designed to streamline rulemaking and prevent the adoption of inefficient or duplicative regulations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill does not create a new entity (like a task force), it does create new procedural requirements that are explicitly aimed at promoting efficiency and cost-effectiveness in government operations. The language is clear in targeting government efficiency through fiscal scrutiny.
The DAVE Act creates the Division of Accountability, Value, and Efficiency within the Department of State Auditor. It mandates state agencies to report on their use of public funds and vacant positions, allowing the Division to evaluate the necessity of these agencies and positions. The Division will utilize data analysis tools, including artificial intelligence, to assess spending effectiveness and identify duplications, ultimately providing recommendations to the General Assembly for potential agency dissolutions and position eliminations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-10 | Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House |
2025-04-10 | Passed 1st Reading |
2025-04-09 | Regular Message Sent To House |
2025-04-09 | Regular Message Received From Senate |
2025-04-08 | Amend Adopted A2 |
2025-04-08 | Amend Tabled A3 |
2025-04-08 | Amend Tabled A5 |
2025-04-08 | Passed 3rd Reading |
Why Relevant: This bill directly creates a new division with the explicit mission to improve government efficiency and value by evaluating agency necessity and identifying cost savings through data-driven analysis.
Mechanism of Influence: The Division will collect data, use AI and analytics to assess agency performance, and recommend structural changes such as dissolutions or eliminations, all aimed at making government operations more efficient and less costly.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent and mechanisms, leaving little ambiguity about its focus on efficiency and cost savings.
H.B. 593 modifies the procedures for local governments and school administrative units in selecting auditors for annual financial audits. It mandates that these entities must solicit sealed bids for auditors, ensures that only certified auditors can be selected, and outlines the consequences for failing to comply with audit requirements. Additionally, it provides for the withholding of sales tax distributions for non-compliance and establishes a process for appeals regarding audit failures.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-16 | Re-ref to the Com on State and Local Government, if favorable, Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House |
2025-04-16 | Withdrawn From Com |
2025-04-16 | Serial Referral To Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House Stricken |
2025-04-01 | Passed 1st Reading |
2025-04-01 | Ref to the Com on Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House |
2025-03-31 | Filed |
Why Relevant: This bill establishes procedural requirements for how local governments and school units select auditors and comply with audit mandates, which are mechanisms to ensure financial accountability and potentially improve government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By standardizing auditor selection (sealed bids, certification requirements) and enforcing timely audits (with penalties for non-compliance), the bill aims to improve the effectiveness of government oversight and the integrity of financial reporting, which can lead to more efficient government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill focuses on audit procedures and compliance, it does not explicitly state that its primary purpose is to promote government efficiency, but the measures have a clear efficiency and accountability rationale.
H.B. 819 introduces significant changes to the General Statutes that govern the Department of Information Technology, emphasizing the need for centralized cybersecurity management and the establishment of the North Carolina Longitudinal Data System. This bill aims to facilitate data sharing among educational institutions and state agencies while ensuring compliance with data privacy laws. Additionally, it provides funding for cybersecurity initiatives and mandates assessments of information technology spending across state agencies to identify redundancies and improve efficiency.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-26 | Special Message Received From House |
2025-06-26 | Passed 1st Reading |
2025-06-26 | Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate |
2025-06-26 | Special Message Sent To Senate |
2025-06-25 | Passed 2nd Reading |
2025-06-25 | Amend Adopted A1 |
2025-06-25 | Ordered Engrossed |
2025-06-25 | Passed 3rd Reading |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly mandates assessments and reporting requirements for information technology spending, with the stated goal of identifying redundancies and improving efficiency across state agencies.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agencies to submit data and participate in IT spending assessments, and by mandating the Department to report on duplicative spending and make recommendations, the bill creates structural mechanisms aimed at streamlining government operations and reducing costs.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language clearly links the assessments and reports to the goals of identifying duplicative spending and improving efficiency, leaving little ambiguity about its intent.
Why Relevant: The bill requires annual compliance assessments for state agency cybersecurity and a third-party assessment of enterprise IT spending to identify inefficiencies.
Mechanism of Influence: These requirements establish ongoing oversight and external review processes that are designed to uncover inefficiencies, reduce overlap, and improve the effectiveness of government IT operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The focus on efficiency and elimination of duplicative spending is explicit in the text.
Why Relevant: The establishment of the North Carolina Longitudinal Data System is aimed at improving data sharing and analysis among agencies, which can streamline processes and enhance government responsiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating a centralized data system and requiring inventories and data safeguarding plans, the bill seeks to modernize and coordinate government functions, reducing redundant data practices.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the primary focus is on data sharing and privacy, the intent to improve efficiency through better coordination is clear.
Legislation ID: 92309
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill No. 1031 proposes amendments to multiple sections of the North Dakota Century Code, focusing on technical corrections, including the repeal of outdated sections and the clarification of definitions such as children, sexual offender, and partnership. The bill aims to streamline legal language and ensure that the references within the code are accurate and relevant. Additionally, it includes provisions related to the public employees retirement system and the processes for performance audits.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-19 | Filed with Secretary Of State 03/14 |
2025-03-18 | Signed by Governor 03/14 |
2025-03-13 | Signed by Speaker |
2025-03-13 | Sent to Governor |
2025-03-12 | Signed by President |
2025-03-10 | Returned to House |
2025-03-07 | Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 7 0 0 |
2025-03-07 | Second reading, passed, yeas 47 nays 0 |
Why Relevant: The bill amends section 52-02-18 to outline the process for conducting performance audits of Job Service North Dakota, including the role of the state auditor. Performance audits are a recognized mechanism for evaluating government efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By specifying the process for independent performance audits, the bill establishes a procedural mechanism to assess and potentially improve the efficiency of a state agency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not explicitly state that the purpose of the audit is to improve efficiency, but performance audits by definition typically evaluate efficiency, effectiveness, and economy of government operations.
Why Relevant: The bill amends subsection 5 of section 54-10-28 to require the presentation of IT compliance review results to specific committees. Such reviews can identify inefficiencies or risks in government IT operations.
Mechanism of Influence: Requiring the presentation of IT compliance review results to oversight committees can help ensure that inefficiencies or compliance issues are identified and addressed, potentially leading to more efficient government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The provision is about compliance review presentation, not explicitly about efficiency, but compliance reviews often uncover inefficiencies.
Legislation ID: 93302
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill modifies section 28-32-18 of the North Dakota Century Code, detailing the grounds on which the administrative rules committee may void rules, the procedure for considering rules, and the process for amending or repealing rules. It establishes specific criteria for voiding rules, outlines the consequences of agency representatives non-appearance, and allows for expedited amendments when agreed upon by the committee and the agency.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-27 | Committee Hearing 09:00 (State and Local Government) |
2025-02-13 | Introduced, first reading, referred toState and Local Government |
2025-02-06 | Received from House |
2025-02-05 | Second reading, passed, yeas 84 nays 7 |
2025-02-03 | Amendment adopted, placed on calendar |
2025-01-31 | Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 11 0 2 |
2025-01-30 | Committee Hearing 03:00 (Political Subdivisions) |
2025-01-13 | Introduced, first reading, referred toPolitical Subdivisions |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes and empowers a legislative committee (the administrative rules committee) with enhanced procedural tools to oversee, amend, or void agency rules, which is a structural mechanism aimed at improving government responsiveness and regulatory efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By allowing expedited amendments/repeals and clarifying the grounds and procedures for voiding rules, the bill could reduce bureaucratic delays, eliminate unnecessary or unauthorized regulations, and streamline the rulemaking process, directly targeting government efficiency and effectiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill's primary focus is on procedural clarity and oversight, its explicit mechanisms (expedited amendments, voiding unauthorized rules) are designed to make government operations more efficient. However, the bill does not create new entities nor mandate broad studies or audits, but rather enhances the powers and procedures of an existing oversight committee.
Legislation ID: 93450
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill introduces a new section to the North Dakota Century Code, mandating that administrative rules expire ten years after their effective date unless reviewed and renewed by the governor. It outlines the responsibilities of the governor in notifying agencies about rule expirations, reviewing rules, and potentially extending their effectiveness. Additionally, it amends existing provisions regarding the force and effect of rules, specifying conditions under which they may expire or be repealed.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-05 | Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 0 nays 92 |
2025-01-31 | Reported back, do not pass, placed on consent calendar 12 0 1 |
2025-01-30 | Committee Hearing 02:30 (Political Subdivisions) |
2025-01-13 | Introduced, first reading, referred toPolitical Subdivisions |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes a systematic review process for administrative rules, explicitly designed to prevent outdated or unnecessary regulations from persisting, which is a structural mechanism aimed at increasing government efficiency and responsiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By instituting mandatory periodic review and potential expiration of rules, the bill forces agencies and the governor's office to regularly evaluate the necessity and effectiveness of existing regulations, potentially eliminating redundant, obsolete, or burdensome rules, and thus streamlining government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill's primary stated mechanism is rule expiration, the intent to promote efficiency is strongly implied by the requirement for regular review and the ability to eliminate unnecessary rules. However, the bill does not explicitly use the word 'efficiency' or 'cost savings.'
Legislation ID: 93474
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill creates a legislative task force on government efficiency, consisting of various appointed members, including state officials and legislators. The task force is tasked with reviewing budgets, collaborating with executive agencies, and submitting annual reports on its findings and recommendations for enhancing efficiency and reducing costs in state government operations. The task force is set to operate until July 31, 2031.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-05 | Committee Hearing 09:30 (Finance and Taxation) |
2025-02-18 | Received from House |
2025-02-18 | Introduced, first reading, (emergency), referred toFinance and Taxation |
2025-02-17 | Second reading, passed, yeas 88 nays 2, Emergency clause carried |
2025-02-13 | Amendment adopted, placed on calendar |
2025-02-12 | Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 13 0 1 |
2025-02-11 | Committee Hearing 08:45 (Industry, Business and Labor) |
2025-01-15 | Introduced, first reading, referred toIndustry, Business and Labor |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly creates a task force with the stated purpose of improving government efficiency and reducing costs through structural and procedural review of state operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a formal body tasked with analyzing budgets, collaborating with agencies, and reporting on efficiency improvements, the bill directly implements a mechanism for ongoing evaluation and enhancement of government effectiveness and cost-saving.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The duties are clearly defined as focusing on efficiency and cost reduction, with specific requirements for collaboration and reporting. There is little ambiguity regarding its relevance to government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 94377
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill modifies existing laws related to the state auditors responsibilities in conducting audits of state agencies and political subdivisions. It outlines the auditors powers, the frequency of audits, the costs associated with these audits, and the requirements for audits of professional boards. The bill also establishes guidelines for billing practices and clarifies the auditors authority in various auditing scenarios.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-24 | Amendment adopted |
2025-03-24 | Rereferred toAppropriations |
2025-03-21 | Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 13 0 1 |
2025-03-06 | Committee Hearing 03:30 (Government and Veterans Affairs) |
2025-02-18 | Introduced, first reading, referred toGovernment and Veterans Affairs |
2025-02-04 | Received from Senate |
2025-02-04 | Motion to reconsider failed |
2025-02-03 | Division B passed |
Why Relevant: The bill directly addresses mechanisms for evaluating government performance by modifying the audit process for state agencies and boards. Audits are a primary tool for uncovering inefficiencies, duplications, and unnecessary expenditures, which aligns with the goal of promoting government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular audits and reports, and empowering the auditor to require cooperation and access to information, the bill aims to ensure accountability and improve operational effectiveness in government entities. The structured audit schedule and reporting requirements are procedural mechanisms to promote efficiency and cost control.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not explicitly state 'to promote efficiency' as its purpose, but the requirement for regular audits and reports is a standard, recognized mechanism for improving efficiency and effectiveness in government operations.
Legislation ID: 94790
Bill URL: View Bill
This concurrent resolution calls for a comprehensive review of all state laws by the Legislative Management. The goal is to identify laws that may no longer serve their intended purpose or that create unnecessary challenges for the citizens of North Dakota. The findings and any legislative recommendations are to be reported to the next Legislative Assembly.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-20 | Second reading, failed to adopt |
2025-03-14 | Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 5 1 0 |
2025-03-06 | Committee Hearing 02:30 (State and Local Government) |
2025-02-21 | Introduced, first reading, referred toState and Local Government |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes a structural mechanism (a comprehensive study by Legislative Management) aimed at identifying and potentially eliminating outdated or unnecessary laws, which is directly tied to improving government efficiency and reducing administrative burdens.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring a review of all state laws to find those that no longer serve their purpose or create unnecessary challenges, the resolution could lead to the repeal or amendment of inefficient or redundant regulations, streamlining government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The resolution is broad in directing a review of all laws, but its stated purpose is clear: to identify outdated or burdensome laws, which is a core government efficiency goal.
Legislation ID: 143853
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends several sections of the Revised Code to establish a framework for legislative review and approval of administrative rules. It introduces provisions for the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review (JCARR) to evaluate proposed rules and allows for third-party fiscal analyses to ensure transparency and accountability in the rule-making process. Additionally, it requires state agencies to publicly post relevant policy documents to improve public access to information regarding agency regulations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-28 | Referred to committee |
2025-01-23 | Introduced |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes procedural mechanisms (JCARR review, independent fiscal analysis, required fiscal transparency) that are designed to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability of government regulation-making. The intent is explicit: to ensure rules are necessary, cost-effective, and transparent before adoption, thereby reducing unnecessary or inefficient regulation.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring legislative review, detailed fiscal analyses, and public disclosure, the bill creates structural checks that can prevent duplicative, costly, or burdensome rules. The ability to request third-party fiscal analysis adds an independent layer of scrutiny, likely leading to more cost-effective and efficient government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's language is specific about improving transparency and accountability, and about the mechanisms for fiscal and procedural review. While it does not use the phrase 'government efficiency' directly, its structure and requirements clearly serve that goal.
Legislation ID: 144815
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill introduces new sections to the Revised Code that establish a framework for a universal regulatory sandbox program in Ohio. The program is designed to enable businesses to demonstrate innovative offerings without the usual regulatory barriers. It also outlines the creation of an advisory committee and a regulatory relief division to oversee the program and recommend necessary changes to state laws and regulations that may hinder business innovation.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-19 | Referred to committee |
2025-03-12 | Introduced |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes new bodies (Advisory Committee, Regulatory Relief Division) whose mission includes identifying and recommending the removal of regulatory barriers to innovation, which is a structural mechanism to improve government efficiency and responsiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: The Advisory Committee and Regulatory Relief Division are empowered to review regulations, identify inefficiencies, recommend changes, and oversee a process that streamlines regulatory requirements for innovative businesses, directly targeting bureaucratic streamlining and modernization.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the primary focus is on enabling business innovation, the bill's provisions for reviewing and recommending changes to regulations, as well as annual reporting to the legislature, are explicitly designed to improve the efficiency of government regulatory processes.
H. B. No. 248 proposes amendments to multiple sections of the Revised Code. It seeks to clarify the roles and responsibilities of public officials regarding financial management and auditing. The bill outlines procedures for contracting financial services, mandates audits of public offices, prescribes financial reporting requirements, and establishes training programs for local officials to improve their financial management skills.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-07 | Referred to committee |
2025-04-29 | Introduced |
Why Relevant: The bill directly aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations by strengthening financial oversight, standardizing audit procedures, and enhancing the skills of public officials through mandatory training.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular audits, clear reporting deadlines, and training, the bill creates procedural mechanisms that are explicitly designed to improve governmental efficiency, reduce the risk of mismanagement, and ensure compliance with financial regulations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is specific regarding audits, reporting, and training, leaving little ambiguity about its intent to improve efficiency in financial management.
Legislation ID: 129112
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill, introduced by Representatives Fowler Arthur and Hiner, aims to enact legislation that revises and streamlines existing occupational regulations. It is part of a broader effort initiated by S.B. 255 of the 132nd General Assembly to enhance the work environment and opportunities for the workforce in Ohio.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-12 | Referred to committee |
2025-02-04 | Introduced |
Why Relevant: The bill's explicit focus is on streamlining and simplifying occupational regulations to improve efficiency for workers and employers. This directly aligns with the criteria of reducing administrative burdens and regulatory inefficiencies.
Mechanism of Influence: By revising and simplifying regulations, the bill would reduce bureaucratic complexity, potentially eliminate unnecessary procedures, and make compliance easier. This is a structural mechanism aimed at improving the effectiveness of government oversight and regulatory frameworks.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the abstract does not specify the creation of new entities or mandated studies, the core purpose is clearly to promote government efficiency in occupational regulation. The language is broad but unambiguously focused on efficiency.
Legislation ID: 62512
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill 1752 introduces the Central Purchasing Act of 2025, which is a new piece of legislation intended to streamline and regulate the central purchasing processes in Oklahoma. The act is designed to enhance efficiency and accountability in government procurement activities.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-04 | Second Reading referred to Rules |
2025-02-03 | Authored by Representative Moore |
2025-02-03 | First Reading |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to enhance efficiency and accountability in government procurement, which directly aligns with efforts to improve government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By streamlining and regulating central purchasing, the act seeks to reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies, potentially lower costs, and improve the effectiveness of government procurement.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the summary does not specify the detailed mechanisms, the stated purpose is clear and relevant to government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 60309
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill introduces the Service Oklahoma Efficiency Act of 2025, which aims to streamline and improve the efficiency of the services offered by Service Oklahoma. It sets forth the framework for this initiative and specifies that it will not be codified into the Oklahoma Statutes.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-04 | Second Reading referred to Rules |
2025-02-03 | First Reading |
2025-02-03 | Authored by Representative Kerbs |
Why Relevant: The bill's stated purpose is to streamline and improve the efficiency of government services provided by Service Oklahoma.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a framework specifically aimed at increasing efficiency, the bill directly addresses the goal of making government operations more effective and less costly.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The summary does not provide details on the specific mechanisms, entities, or processes that will be used to achieve efficiency, so the breadth of its impact is unclear.
Legislation ID: 57135
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill establishes the Corporation Commission Efficiency Act of 2025, which is intended to streamline and enhance the effectiveness of the Corporation Commissions operations. It aims to implement reforms that will facilitate better governance and oversight within the commissions framework.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-04 | Second Reading referred to Rules |
2025-02-03 | First Reading |
2025-02-03 | Authored by Representative Hilbert |
Why Relevant: The bill is explicitly designed to promote government efficiency by streamlining and enhancing the effectiveness of the Corporation Commission's operations.
Mechanism of Influence: It proposes reforms to facilitate better governance and oversight, which are core mechanisms for improving government efficiency and effectiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the abstract clearly states the intent to enhance efficiency, the specific reforms or mechanisms are not detailed in the provided text. The title and purpose are explicit, but further details would be needed to assess the concrete steps proposed.
Legislation ID: 55948
Bill URL: View Bill
HB2728 enacts the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2025, which mandates that any administrative rule proposed by state agencies must be approved by the legislature before it can take effect. This bill seeks to empower lawmakers to have a direct say in the regulatory process, potentially reducing the number of unnecessary regulations imposed on citizens and businesses.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-21 | Approved by Governor 05/21/2025 |
2025-05-15 | Sent to Governor |
2025-05-15 | Enrolled, signed, to Senate |
2025-05-15 | Enrolled measure signed, returned to House |
2025-05-14 | SAs read, adopted |
2025-05-14 | Coauthored by Representative(s) Duel, Hilbert, Olsen, Hays, Stark, George, Grego, Hardin, Townley, West (Kevin), Osburn, Roberts, Miller, Culver, Wolfley, Strom, Fetgatter, Lowe (Dick), Dobrinski, Staires, Burns, Eaves, Turner, Hall, Wilk, Blair, Adams, Chapman, Caldwell (Chad), Bashore, Pfeiffer |
2025-05-14 | Referred for enrollment |
2025-05-14 | Fourth Reading, Measure and Emergency Passed: Ayes: 74 Nays: 12 |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes a structural procedural mechanism—legislative review of administrative rules—explicitly designed to prevent unnecessary or burdensome regulations, with the stated intent of promoting government efficiency and responsiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring legislative approval for new administrative rules, the bill aims to reduce regulatory burdens and unnecessary rules, streamline the regulatory process, and ensure that regulations are justified and efficient.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill's description states the goal is to reduce unnecessary regulations, it does not directly create a new entity (e.g., a commission or task force), but it does set up a new process for oversight and control. The intent to improve efficiency is explicit.
Legislation ID: 55933
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 318 modifies the responsibilities of the Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency and introduces a new division for reviewing administrative rules. It mandates the Office to conduct rule impact analyses for major rules proposed by state agencies, ensuring that these rules are evaluated for their economic and social effects. Additionally, the bill updates existing laws regarding the approval process for emergency rules and requires agencies to submit rule impact statements to the Office.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-10 | Placed on General Order |
2025-03-05 | Reported Do Pass as amended Appropriations committee; CR filed |
2025-03-05 | Title stricken |
2025-02-24 | Coauthored by Representative Woolley |
2025-02-13 | Coauthored by Representative Kendrix (principal House author) |
2025-02-13 | Reported Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Administrative Rules committee; CR filed |
2025-02-13 | Coauthored by Senator Jett |
2025-02-13 | Referred to Appropriations |
Why Relevant: The bill creates a new division specifically to review administrative rules and conduct impact analyses, which are structural mechanisms aimed at improving government efficiency and accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring independent, timely analyses of major rules—including cost-benefit evaluations and alternatives—the bill is designed to prevent unnecessary or inefficient regulations, reduce administrative burdens, and ensure government actions are cost-effective.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill explicitly states the mission of the new division and the analyses is to evaluate economic and social effects, including cost-benefit, which directly ties to government efficiency. There is little ambiguity as the language is clear about the purpose and requirements.
Legislation ID: 62709
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 821 seeks to amend Section 34.36 of Title 62 of the Oklahoma Statutes, which governs the reporting of budgetary needs by state agencies. The bill introduces additional requirements for agencies to provide detailed information about their technology needs and estimated expenditures, along with other budgetary analyses. This aims to ensure more informed decision-making and accountability in state fiscal affairs.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-02 | Referred to Appropriations and Budget General Government Subcommittee |
2025-04-01 | Second Reading referred to Appropriations and Budget |
2025-03-24 | First Reading |
2025-03-24 | Engrossed to House |
2025-03-18 | Referred for engrossment |
2025-03-18 | General Order, Considered |
2025-03-18 | Measure passed: Ayes: 44 Nays: 0 |
2025-02-27 | Coauthored by Representative Pae (principal House author) |
Why Relevant: The bill directly targets government efficiency by mandating detailed, standardized, and performance-informed budget reporting from state agencies. It also seeks to identify and implement cost savings through shared services and requires agencies to justify independent operations if not using shared services.
Mechanism of Influence: Creates procedural reforms (uniform forms, detailed reporting, performance metrics), mandates cost analysis of shared services, and gives authority to require shared service contracts where cost savings are identified. These measures are structural and procedural mechanisms to improve efficiency, reduce duplication, and promote cost-effectiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's language is explicit about improving informed decision-making, accountability, and cost savings, leaving little ambiguity regarding its focus on efficiency.
Legislation ID: 116022
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill 2402 requires all state agencies in Oregon to review their administrative rules by January 1, 2027. The bill aims to simplify these rules and remove any redundancies both within and between agencies. This initiative is intended to enhance clarity and efficiency in the regulatory framework.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-17 | Referred to Emergency Management, General Government, and Veterans with subsequent referral to Ways and Means. |
2025-01-13 | First reading. Referred to Speakers desk. |
Why Relevant: The bill directly mandates a government-wide initiative to review, simplify, and streamline administrative rules, with the explicit goal of removing redundancies and improving efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agencies to examine and revise their rules for clarity and redundancy, the bill aims to reduce bureaucratic overlap, unnecessary complexity, and administrative burden, leading to a more efficient regulatory environment.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent to promote efficiency, but the specific criteria for 'simplification' and 'redundancy' may be subject to agency interpretation.
Legislation ID: 117258
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill 3803 directs the Oregon Department of Administrative Services (DAS) to develop strategic workforce plans, create task forces for defining agency functions and performance measures, and implement reporting requirements for public funds distributed to non-profit entities. It also establishes audit teams to focus on small public entities and enhance economic returns on investment. The bill sets deadlines for the implementation of these provisions and includes sunset clauses for certain task forces.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-27 | In committee upon adjournment. |
2025-05-14 | Recommendation: Do pass with amendments, be printed A-Engrossed, and be referred to Ways and Means. |
2025-05-14 | Referred to Ways and Means by order of Speaker. |
2025-05-07 | Work Session held. |
2025-03-31 | Public Hearing held. |
2025-03-04 | Referred to Rules. |
2025-02-27 | First reading. Referred to Speakers desk. |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes new task forces and audit teams specifically tasked with identifying and implementing cost savings, improving performance measurement, and streamlining agency functions—core mechanisms to enhance government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating strategic workforce planning, performance reviews, and the elimination of obsolete standards, the bill targets structural and procedural inefficiencies. The creation of audit teams and task forces directly supports ongoing evaluation and improvement of government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill requires or authorizes studies, audits, reports, and regular reviews of government performance, all with the explicit goal of improving efficiency and accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: Mandated reporting, transparency measures, and performance reviews are designed to uncover duplicative or inefficient practices, promote best practices, and ensure responsible use of public funds.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill includes sunset clauses for certain task forces, indicating that some are temporary study groups focused on evaluating and improving government processes.
Mechanism of Influence: Temporary task forces can provide focused evaluation and recommendations for structural reforms, which can then be implemented to improve efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 115591
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 1089 mandates state agencies to procure common off-the-shelf software through a designated online marketplace, streamlining the purchasing process. It also establishes a grant and loan program managed by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services to assist agencies in replacing outdated technology. The bill creates a Technology Modernization Fund to support these initiatives and outlines the responsibilities of the State Chief Information Officer in overseeing the marketplace and fund management.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-25 | Referred to Information Management and Technology. |
2025-02-25 | Introduction and first reading. Referred to Presidents desk. |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to improve government efficiency by streamlining software procurement, supporting technology modernization, and prioritizing cost-saving initiatives.
Mechanism of Influence: It establishes new structural and procedural mechanisms: a centralized purchasing marketplace, a dedicated modernization fund, a grant/loan program, biannual reporting requirements, and an advisory board. These are all designed to reduce costs, eliminate duplication, modernize operations, and improve oversight.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 114984
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 431 mandates the Secretary of State to examine state offices and submit a report with findings and potential legislative recommendations to the interim committees of the Legislative Assembly related to general government by September 15, 2026. The provision is set to be repealed on January 2, 2027.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-17 | Referred to Rules. |
2025-01-13 | Introduction and first reading. Referred to Presidents desk. |
Why Relevant: The bill mandates a study and report by a government official (Secretary of State) specifically targeting state offices, with the intent to provide findings and legislative recommendations to improve government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring the Secretary of State to examine state offices and report findings and recommendations to legislative committees, the bill establishes a formal evaluation process that could uncover inefficiencies, duplications, or opportunities for improvement in government structure and processes.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not explicitly state that the study's purpose is to promote efficiency or cost savings, but the inclusion of 'findings and potential legislative recommendations' to general government committees strongly suggests an intent to improve government operations. However, the specific focus (efficiency, cost, modernization, etc.) is not spelled out.
Legislation ID: 115187
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 651 mandates the Secretary of State to study and identify methods for alleviating the paperwork burden faced by businesses in Oregon. The findings and potential legislative recommendations are to be reported to the interim committees of the Legislative Assembly related to business by September 15, 2026. The bill includes a sunset provision, repealing the study requirement on January 2, 2027.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-30 | Public Hearing held. |
2025-01-17 | Referred to Labor and Business. |
2025-01-13 | Introduction and first reading. Referred to Presidents desk. |
Why Relevant: This bill mandates a formal study aimed at identifying and recommending methods to streamline bureaucratic paperwork requirements for businesses, a clear effort to improve government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring the Secretary of State to evaluate and propose ways to reduce paperwork burdens, the bill seeks to uncover inefficiencies and suggest reforms that could make government processes less cumbersome and more responsive to business needs.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its focus on reducing the paperwork burden, which is a direct measure of administrative efficiency. However, the specific methods or scope of study are not detailed, leaving room for interpretation in implementation.
Legislation ID: 194631
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill proposes the implementation of a pilot program to increase the staffing of the Office of Inspector General by at least 50% over a two-year period, contingent on funding. The additional staff will focus on investigating claims of fraud and misconduct. A report detailing the outcomes of this pilot program must be submitted to the General Assembly after one year of the new hires.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-22 | Referred toState Government |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly creates a pilot program and mandates a report evaluating the effect of increased staffing on government oversight functions. The stated purpose is to improve the detection and investigation of fraud and misconduct, which aligns with improving government efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By increasing staff and requiring outcome-based reporting, the bill introduces a structural mechanism (a pilot program) to test whether more resources in the Inspector General's office lead to better performance and cost recovery. The mandatory report provides a procedural evaluation of the pilot's impact, supporting data-driven decisions on government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not explicitly state that its goal is to promote 'government efficiency' in broad terms, but the focus on fraud investigation and reporting on cost recovery strongly implies an intent to make government operations more effective and less wasteful.
Legislation ID: 17625
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 245 introduces the Regulatory Sandbox Program Act, which creates a framework for businesses to test innovative products or services in a controlled environment with regulatory flexibility. The Act establishes a Regulatory Relief Office to oversee the program and an advisory committee to provide guidance. It outlines the definitions, roles, and processes involved in applying for and participating in the sandbox, including requirements for applicants and the responsibilities of regulatory agencies.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-13 | Referred to INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes new governmental entities (Regulatory Relief Office and Advisory Committee) whose mission is to oversee a program designed to improve regulatory efficiency and responsiveness, particularly by streamlining processes for innovative businesses.
Mechanism of Influence: The Regulatory Relief Office and Advisory Committee are tasked with identifying and implementing regulatory flexibility, coordinating between agencies, and evaluating applications for participation. This structure is intended to reduce bureaucratic barriers and administrative burdens for businesses, thus promoting government efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the primary focus is on regulatory flexibility for businesses, the creation of the office and committee is explicitly to streamline and modernize regulatory processes, which aligns with the goal of improving government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 194951
Bill URL: View Bill
This legislation modifies the existing framework for regulatory review in Pennsylvania by providing a clearer definition for regulations that have significant economic impacts and establishing a structured process for reviewing these regulations after they have been in effect for three years. The bill also mandates agencies to report on the status and impact of these regulations, ensuring that they remain in the public interest.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-11 | Referred toIntergovernmental Affairs & Operations |
2025-06-10 | Re-reported as committed |
2025-06-10 | Third consideration and final passage, (27-23) |
2025-06-10 | (Remarks see Senate Journal Page ....) |
2025-06-09 | Re-referred toAppropriations |
2025-06-09 | Second consideration |
2025-06-04 | First consideration |
2025-06-04 | Reported as committed |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes ongoing reporting and review requirements for economically significant regulations, with a specific goal of ensuring these regulations remain necessary and effective. It creates a structured mechanism (agency reports, public comment, commission review) to identify regulations that may be outdated, unnecessarily burdensome, or no longer in the public interest, which aligns directly with efforts to improve government efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating periodic agency reports and enabling independent commission reviews, the bill creates procedural mechanisms to evaluate and potentially streamline or eliminate inefficient or costly regulations. The inclusion of public feedback and economic impact analysis further supports the goal of reducing administrative burdens and regulatory inefficiencies.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not explicitly use the term 'efficiency,' but the required evaluation of economic impact, necessity, and public interest, as well as the potential for amendment or repeal, strongly implies a focus on efficiency and effectiveness in government regulation.
Legislation ID: 194969
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends the Regulatory Review Act to introduce definitions related to the newly established Office of Government Efficiency. It empowers this office to review existing regulations, recommend modifications, and ensure that regulations are not unduly burdensome. The office will also facilitate public input on regulatory changes and report annually to the General Assembly and the Governor on its findings and recommendations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-19 | Referred toIntergovernmental Operations |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a new Office of Government Efficiency, whose explicit mission is to review regulations for efficiency, reduce burdens, and recommend modifications to streamline government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating a dedicated office with authority to review, recommend, and report on regulatory improvements, the bill establishes a structural mechanism to promote ongoing government efficiency and effectiveness. The requirement to identify regulations for repeal with each new regulation further enforces efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's language is clear in its intent to promote efficiency, though the specific criteria for what constitutes 'unduly burdensome' regulations may be subject to interpretation by the office.
Legislation ID: 194981
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill establishes the Commonwealth Zero-Based Budgeting Act, mandating a comprehensive review of state government programs through zero-based budgeting. The Secretary of the Budget is required to review all programs at least once every five years, with a phased approach starting in 2025. Agencies must submit detailed plans justifying their existence and expenditures, while certain educational services are exempt from this review.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-24 | First consideration |
2025-06-24 | Reported as amended |
2025-03-19 | Referred toFinance |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a recurring, structured review process (zero-based budgeting) explicitly designed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations by requiring agencies to justify their expenditures and existence.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating periodic, comprehensive budget justifications and reviews for all state programs, the bill creates a procedural mechanism to identify waste, eliminate unnecessary spending, and ensure that government resources are allocated efficiently.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is clear in its intent to promote government efficiency and accountability through zero-based budgeting. The exemption for certain educational services is specific and does not undermine the overall efficiency goal.
Legislation ID: 195454
Bill URL: View Bill
This resolution highlights the achievements of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in reducing waste and improving government processes. It emphasizes the need for continued support and resources for DOGE, especially in light of its significant savings for taxpayers and the importance of incorporating technological advancements in public services.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-09 | Referred toIntergovernmental Operations |
Why Relevant: The resolution explicitly focuses on government efficiency, supporting an entity (DOGE) whose mission is to improve government operations, reduce waste, and incorporate technology to streamline processes.
Mechanism of Influence: By calling for resources and support for DOGE, the resolution aims to empower this department to continue and expand its efficiency initiatives. It also encourages the adoption of technological solutions for better public service delivery.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the resolution is largely commendatory and does not itself establish new structural mechanisms or mandates, it does directly address the mission of government efficiency and the need for continued efforts and support.
Legislation ID: 195301
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends the Regulatory Review Act of 1982 to include new definitions, revise procedures for the review of proposed regulations, and establish requirements for economically significant regulations. It also introduces protocols for the withdrawal of regulations and outlines the roles of the Office of Government Efficiency and State agency regulatory compliance officers.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-30 | Referred toIntergovernmental Operations |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes the Office of Government Efficiency, a nonpartisan entity tasked with reviewing statutes and regulations to enhance government efficiency, and mandates annual reports with recommendations for improvement.
Mechanism of Influence: This office will systematically review government operations and regulations to identify inefficiencies, redundancies, and opportunities for cost savings, and will recommend modifications or repeals. Its findings are reported to the legislature for potential action.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill requires agencies to designate regulatory compliance officers whose role includes facilitating communication and ensuring compliance, which is a structural mechanism to improve regulatory efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By designating compliance officers, agencies are expected to streamline regulatory processes, improve responsiveness, and reduce administrative burdens for regulated entities.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill mandates that agencies, when promulgating new regulations, must identify two existing regulations for repeal, and establishes regular reviews of existing regulations. This is a procedural mechanism aimed at reducing regulatory burden and improving efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: This 'two-out for one-in' rule directly targets regulatory accumulation and encourages agencies to eliminate outdated or unnecessary rules, thus streamlining government functions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill revises the procedures for review and approval of regulations, particularly those with significant economic impact, and requires detailed cost estimates and fiscal analysis.
Mechanism of Influence: These procedural changes are intended to ensure that only cost-effective and necessary regulations are approved, reducing unnecessary regulatory expansion and associated costs.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 196807
Bill URL: View Bill
Bill 3485 proposes amendments to the South Carolina Code of Laws to require annual audits of school districts, counties, municipalities, and other public entities by the State Auditor. It repeals several existing sections related to county and municipal audits, consolidating the auditing process under a single authority to ensure thorough oversight of public funds.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-14 | Referred to Committee on Judiciary ( House Journal-page 221 ) |
2025-01-14 | Introduced and read first time ( House Journal-page 221 ) |
2024-12-05 | Prefiled |
2024-12-05 | Referred to Committee on Judiciary |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a structural mechanism (annual audits by the State Auditor) designed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations. It consolidates audit functions, which is an explicit effort to streamline bureaucratic processes and enhance oversight.
Mechanism of Influence: By centralizing audit responsibilities under the State Auditor and repealing fragmented requirements, the bill is intended to eliminate duplicative efforts, reduce administrative burden, and provide consistent, thorough oversight of public funds.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its goal of streamlining and consolidating audit processes for efficiency. There is little ambiguity regarding its intent to improve government operations.
Legislation ID: 195560
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill introduces the "Earmark Responsibility, Accountability, Integrity, and Transparency Act" which mandates that organizations receiving state funds must submit itemized reports on how the funds are spent. It outlines the requirements for these organizations to provide quarterly updates and a final accounting of expenditures, including receipts. Failure to comply will result in the obligation to repay the funds received, plus interest.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-30 | Referred to Committee on Ways and Means ( House Journal-page 41 ) |
2025-01-30 | Introduced and read first time ( House Journal-page 41 ) |
Why Relevant: The bill introduces structural procedural requirements (mandatory reporting, justification, and potential clawback of funds) explicitly aimed at increasing the efficiency and accountability of government spending. These mechanisms are designed to ensure state funds are used as intended and reduce waste or misuse.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating detailed, periodic financial reporting and requiring justification for unspent funds, the bill would likely streamline oversight, reduce the risk of misallocation, and promote more efficient use of public resources. The threat of repayment incentivizes compliance and careful fund management.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not create a new entity or commission, but it does establish a systematic reporting and accountability process that directly targets government efficiency. Its language is clear about its objectives and mechanisms.
Legislation ID: 195678
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends various sections of the South Carolina Code of Laws to establish the Small Business Regulatory Review Committee, which will evaluate regulations pending reauthorization and make recommendations to the General Assembly. The bill also outlines requirements for agencies when promulgating regulations, including the need for cost-benefit analyses and the identification of existing regulations to remove. It aims to ensure that regulations do not exceed the necessary scope and are subject to periodic review and automatic expiration.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-21 | Referred to Committee on Judiciary ( Senate Journal-page 4 ) |
2025-01-21 | Introduced and read first time ( Senate Journal-page 4 ) |
Why Relevant: The bill directly creates a new committee with the explicit mission to review, reduce, and streamline government regulations, which is a structural mechanism to improve government efficiency and reduce unnecessary administrative burdens.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing the Small Business Regulatory Review Committee and requiring agencies to justify, update, or remove regulations, the bill sets up an ongoing process for identifying and implementing cost savings and efficiency improvements. The periodic review, cost-benefit analysis, and automatic expiration provisions are designed to reduce redundancy and excessive regulation.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit about its focus on regulatory efficiency and reduction. The requirement to reduce regulatory requirements by 25% is a clear quantitative target. Some discretion remains in how the committee evaluates 'impact' and 'necessity,' but the overall intent is unambiguous.
Legislation ID: 199632
Bill URL: View Bill
The bill creates a commission tasked with identifying areas for spending reductions in the state budget, reviewing regulations to ease burdens on businesses and citizens, and recommending improvements to government efficiency. The commission will report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly and the Governor by specified deadlines, and it will be dissolved after its final report in 2026.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-08 | Roll call Ayes-34 Nays-11 ( Senate Journal-page 65 ) |
2025-05-08 | Amended ( Senate Journal-page 65 ) |
2025-05-08 | Read third time and sent to House ( Senate Journal-page 65 ) |
2025-05-07 | Roll call Ayes-35 Nays-6 ( Senate Journal-page 65 ) |
2025-05-07 | Read second time ( Senate Journal-page 65 ) |
2025-05-07 | Committee Amendment Adopted ( Senate Journal-page 65 ) |
2025-05-07 | Amended ( Senate Journal-page 65 ) |
2025-02-25 | Scriveners error corrected |
Why Relevant: The bill directly creates a commission with the explicit purpose of improving government efficiency and reducing costs.
Mechanism of Influence: The commission is empowered to review appropriations and regulations, conduct surveys of government structure and funding, and recommend spending reductions and regulatory repeals. Its findings are reported to state leadership for potential action.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The commission’s duties are clearly specified as relating to government efficiency; there is no ambiguity about the intent.
Legislation ID: 196480
Bill URL: View Bill
Bill 533 aims to amend the South Carolina Code of Laws to provide the Legislative Audit Council with the authority to issue subpoenas for documents and sworn testimony necessary for conducting audits. It also revises qualifications for the Councils director, expands access to agency records, and defines the confidentiality of audit records, establishing penalties for non-compliance.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-04 | Scriveners error corrected |
2025-04-02 | Introduced and read first time ( Senate Journal-page 5 ) |
2025-04-02 | Referred to Committee on Judiciary ( Senate Journal-page 5 ) |
Why Relevant: The bill directly empowers the Legislative Audit Council to more effectively conduct audits of government agencies by granting subpoena authority and expanding access to records. These changes are explicitly aimed at improving the Council's ability to uncover inefficiencies, waste, or mismanagement within government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By allowing the LAC to compel the production of documents and testimony, the bill strengthens oversight and accountability mechanisms, which are key to identifying and addressing inefficiencies and improving government performance. Enhanced access and authority can lead to more thorough and effective audits.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is specific about audit authority and subpoena power, but does not create a new entity or mandate specific studies. Its primary focus is on strengthening an existing oversight body.
Legislation ID: 75719
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill 1051 amends several sections of South Dakota law to enhance the legislative oversight of administrative rules. It establishes clearer definitions for agencies and rules, updates the structure and function of the Interim Rules Review Committee, and mandates the preparation of impact statements for proposed rules that affect small businesses. The bill aims to streamline the rulemaking process while ensuring that the interests of small businesses are considered.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-13 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-03-05 | Delivered to the Governor |
2025-03-04 | Signed by the President |
2025-03-03 | Signed by the Speaker |
2025-02-27 | Do Pass as amended |
2025-02-26 | Do Pass |
2025-02-26 | Schedule for hearing |
2025-02-03 | Refer to Committee |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes and empowers the Interim Rules Review Committee, a legislative oversight body, to review and schedule meetings on proposed agency rules. It also requires agencies to prepare fiscal notes and impact statements, which are procedural mechanisms intended to improve government transparency and performance.
Mechanism of Influence: By structuring and empowering a committee to oversee agency rulemaking, and by mandating fiscal and impact analyses, the bill directly aims to streamline processes, reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens, and ensure government actions are cost-effective and responsive to public and business concerns.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill’s intent to promote efficiency is indicated by its focus on streamlining procedures and requiring impact/fiscal analyses, though it does not use the word 'efficiency' explicitly. Its provisions are nonetheless clearly aimed at making government rulemaking more effective and less burdensome.
Legislation ID: 75955
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill 1206 amends existing statutes related to the management of state funds, including definitions of key terms such as Agency, Budget unit, and General contingency funds. It outlines the authority and processes for transferring appropriations, the role of the special committee in managing these funds, and establishes requirements for reporting and accountability regarding state expenditures. The bill aims to enhance fiscal oversight and ensure appropriations are used as intended.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-24 | Defer to the 41st legislative day |
2025-02-24 | Schedule for hearing |
2025-02-21 | Schedule for hearing |
2025-02-19 | Schedule for hearing |
2025-02-18 | Schedule for hearing |
2025-02-10 | Schedule for hearing |
2025-02-03 | First read in House and referred |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes and empowers a 'special committee' with explicit oversight and program evaluation duties related to state fiscal operations. It mandates reporting, accountability, and public hearings, all with the stated aim of improving fiscal oversight and ensuring appropriations are used as intended.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring annual revenue projections, codifying fund transfer processes, and empowering a committee to evaluate programs and hold hearings, the bill introduces structural and procedural mechanisms to enhance efficiency, transparency, and responsiveness in government financial operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill's primary focus is fiscal oversight, it explicitly mentions program evaluations and hearings, which are mechanisms for identifying inefficiencies and improving government operations. The intent to 'streamline' is supported by the repeal of outdated provisions and more rigorous approval processes.
Legislation ID: 76614
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 146 amends various sections of the South Dakota Codified Laws to clarify and enhance the processes for budgetary appropriations, transfers, and the use of contingency funds. It outlines the roles of state agencies, the special committee, and the Bureau of Finance and Management in managing state funds, ensuring that appropriations are used for their intended purposes, and establishing procedures for transferring funds between budget units.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-13 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-03-10 | Delivered to the Governor |
2025-03-06 | Signed by the Speaker |
2025-03-06 | Signed by the President |
2025-03-05 | Do Pass as amended |
2025-03-04 | Schedule for hearing |
2025-03-04 | Do Pass |
2025-02-25 | First read in House and referred |
Why Relevant: The bill outlines the responsibilities of a special committee in managing contingency funds and reviewing state fiscal policies, including continual evaluation and coordination of state budgetary policy.
Mechanism of Influence: By empowering a special committee to oversee contingency funds and coordinate fiscal policy, the bill creates a structural mechanism designed to improve government efficiency and responsiveness in budget management.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language does not explicitly state that the purpose is to promote government efficiency, but the continual evaluation and coordination roles strongly imply this intent.
Why Relevant: Provisions requiring annual revenue projections and detailed procedures for fund transfers and contingency fund requests are intended to improve fiscal discipline and transparency.
Mechanism of Influence: Mandating structured processes for revenue projections, fund transfers, and contingency fund requests can help reduce fiscal inefficiencies and ensure funds are used appropriately.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While these provisions do not explicitly state an efficiency goal, the procedural improvements are generally recognized as mechanisms for enhancing government effectiveness.
Why Relevant: The bill repeals outdated provisions and updates definitions, which can help eliminate confusion and streamline government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: Modernizing legal definitions and removing obsolete rules can reduce administrative burdens and clarify responsibilities.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The repeal and definitional updates are not explicitly tied to efficiency, but their practical effect is to streamline processes.
Legislation ID: 76623
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 149 aims to implement measures that will improve the overall operations of state government in South Dakota. The bill introduces provisions that will streamline processes, enhance accountability, and ensure that state resources are utilized effectively to serve the citizens of South Dakota.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-21 | Table |
2025-02-03 | Refer to Committee |
2025-01-30 | First Reading Senate |
Why Relevant: The bill's stated intent is to improve the operations and effectiveness of state government, which directly aligns with the goal of promoting government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By streamlining processes and enhancing accountability, the bill aims to make government more efficient and effective. The focus on effective resource utilization further supports efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The abstract and provisions are broad and general; specific mechanisms, such as the creation of a task force or commission, are not detailed. However, the explicit intent to improve government operations and efficiency is clear.
Legislation ID: 76687
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 176 amends existing legislation to provide the Government Operations and Audit Committee with clearer authority to examine records, issue subpoenas, and conduct investigations. The bill outlines the committees powers to summon witnesses, take depositions, and use civil discovery procedures. It also stipulates that subpoenas must be ratified by the Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council before issuance, ensuring oversight of the committees investigative powers.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-31 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-03-13 | Delivered to the Governor |
2025-03-11 | Signed by the Speaker |
2025-03-10 | Signed by the President |
2025-03-06 | Concur in amendments |
2025-03-04 | Do Pass as amended |
2025-02-26 | Schedule for hearing |
2025-02-26 | Do Pass as amended |
Why Relevant: The bill directly empowers a legislative oversight entity (the Government Operations and Audit Committee) to investigate and audit government operations, which is a structural mechanism to improve government efficiency and accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: By granting the committee powers to access records, compel testimony, and issue subpoenas, the bill enables more thorough investigations of government performance, potential inefficiencies, and administrative practices. This can lead to the identification and correction of waste, fraud, or duplicative efforts.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not explicitly state that the goal is to improve government efficiency, but the structure and powers given to the committee are standard mechanisms used to achieve such outcomes. The intent is inferred from the nature of the committee and its functions.
Legislation ID: 76363
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 53 modifies the internal control system for state agencies in South Dakota. It defines key terms, outlines the responsibilities of the State Board of Internal Control, and mandates annual reviews of internal control measures by each agency. The bill emphasizes the need for compliance with established guidelines and the importance of ethical conduct within state agencies.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-03 | Schedule for hearing |
2025-02-03 | Table |
2025-01-14 | First read in Senate and referred |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes procedural mechanisms (annual reviews, officer designations, board oversight) specifically aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations through better internal controls.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular reviews, standardized reporting, and centralized oversight, the bill is designed to identify inefficiencies, prevent waste, and streamline agency operations. The board's rulemaking authority and evaluation responsibilities further institutionalize ongoing efforts to improve performance and compliance.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 76387
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 61 amends existing statutes to clarify the roles and responsibilities of the State Board of Internal Control, including the establishment of guidelines for internal controls, the designation of internal control officers within state agencies, and the requirement for annual reviews of internal control systems. The bill aims to ensure compliance with ethical standards and improve the effectiveness of internal controls to prevent financial malfeasance.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-13 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-03-10 | Delivered to the Governor |
2025-03-06 | Signed by the Speaker |
2025-03-06 | Signed by the President |
2025-03-03 | Amend |
2025-03-03 | Do Pass as amended |
2025-02-26 | Reconsider (vote by which passed/lost) |
2025-02-26 | Schedule for hearing |
Why Relevant: The bill creates and empowers a permanent oversight entity (the State Board of Internal Control) whose explicit mission is to improve the effectiveness of internal controls within state agencies, which is a core mechanism for promoting government efficiency and preventing waste or malfeasance.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring annual reviews, designating internal control officers, and granting rulemaking authority to the Board, the bill institutes structural and procedural mechanisms to evaluate and improve government operations, reduce risk, and ensure cost-effective management.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its purpose and mechanisms; there is little ambiguity regarding its intent to improve efficiency and effectiveness in government operations.
Legislation ID: 178822
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends certain sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated to streamline the reporting process for government efficiency initiatives. Specifically, it mandates that progress reports on economic efficiency be submitted to the governor, thereby ensuring that the states executive branch is informed about these efforts.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-12 | P2C, caption bill, held on desk - pending amdt. |
2025-02-10 | Intro., P1C. |
2025-02-06 | Filed for introduction |
Why Relevant: The bill directly addresses government efficiency by mandating reporting on economic efficiency initiatives and ensuring these reports reach the governor, which may improve oversight and responsiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring progress reports on economic efficiency to be submitted to the governor, the bill aims to enhance executive awareness and potentially facilitate more timely or effective policy responses to efficiency initiatives.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not establish a new body or require new studies, but it does modify reporting channels to potentially improve government operations. The scope of 'economic efficiency' is not further defined, but the intent to promote efficiency is explicit.
Legislation ID: 178202
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated to facilitate the acceptance of electronic transmissions for documents that were previously submitted by fax or mail. It establishes definitions and guidelines for electronic communication, including the types of documents that can be transmitted electronically, the procedures for their submission, and the requirements for maintaining records of these transactions. The bill aims to streamline operations within state agencies and the judicial system by promoting the use of electronic submissions.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-04 | Pub. Ch. 94 |
2025-04-04 | Effective date(s) 01/01/2026 |
2025-03-28 | Signed by Governor. |
2025-03-20 | Transmitted to Governor for his action. |
2025-03-19 | Signed by Senate Speaker |
2025-03-19 | Signed by H. Speaker |
2025-03-11 | Enrolled; ready for sig. of H. Speaker. |
2025-03-10 | Amendment withdrawn. (Amendment 1 - SA0036) |
Why Relevant: The bill's primary purpose is to streamline government operations by mandating the acceptance of electronic document submissions across state agencies and courts, which directly aims to improve efficiency and modernize government functions.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agencies and courts to accept electronic transmissions, the bill reduces reliance on outdated methods (fax, mail), speeds up processing times, decreases administrative burdens, and facilitates recordkeeping. It also prompts courts to create rules for electronic filing, further standardizing and improving government procedures.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit about its efficiency goals and mechanisms; there is little ambiguity that its intent is to make government operations more efficient by adopting electronic communication.
Legislation ID: 178217
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends specific sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated to facilitate the electronic submission of reports required by state government entities. It aims to streamline administrative processes and improve efficiency in governmental operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-03 | P2C, caption bill, held on desk - pending amdt. |
2025-01-27 | Intro., P1C. |
2025-01-23 | Filed for introduction |
Why Relevant: The bill directly seeks to improve the efficiency of government operations by enabling electronic submission of required reports, which is a clear procedural mechanism aimed at making government less costly and more responsive.
Mechanism of Influence: By allowing electronic submission, the bill reduces paperwork, speeds up reporting processes, and may lower administrative costs associated with handling physical documents. It modernizes a government function and streamlines bureaucracy.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is specific in its scope (electronic submission of reports) and explicitly states the goal of improving efficiency. The language is not overly broad or ambiguous in this context.
Legislation ID: 130660
Bill URL: View Bill
This act mandates a study by the commissioner of health to explore and recommend ways to create or streamline pathways for individuals with military medical training to become primary care providers in Tennessee. The study will identify administrative barriers, educational requirements, and methods for recruiting veterans into healthcare roles such as physicians, nurses, and physician assistants, with findings due by December 31, 2025.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-10 | Assigned to s/c Health Subcommittee |
2025-02-06 | P2C, ref. to Health Committee |
2025-02-05 | Intro., P1C. |
2025-02-04 | Filed for introduction |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly mandates a study to identify and recommend ways to streamline administrative processes and reduce barriers for military-trained individuals to enter the healthcare workforce. This directly aligns with the goal of improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations by evaluating and potentially eliminating unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring a study focused on removing administrative barriers and streamlining licensure pathways, the bill creates a procedural mechanism (a mandated evaluation) designed to make government functions—in this case, healthcare workforce credentialing—more efficient and responsive.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the act is targeted at a specific sector (healthcare workforce entry for military-trained personnel), the language clearly focuses on administrative efficiency and process improvement.
Legislation ID: 179101
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated to facilitate the acceptance of electronic transmissions for documents that were previously submitted via fax or similar methods. It defines electronic transmission and outlines the responsibilities of state agencies and courts in implementing these changes. The bill seeks to streamline communication and filing processes in governmental operations and is set to take effect on January 1, 2026.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-04 | Comp. became Pub. Ch. 94 |
2025-03-10 | Sponsor(s) Added. |
2025-03-10 | Companion House Bill substituted |
2025-03-07 | Placed on Senate Regular Calendar for 3/10/2025 |
2025-03-04 | Recommended for passage with amendment/s, refer to Senate Calendar Committee Ayes 9, Nays 0 PNV 0 |
2025-02-25 | Placed on Senate State and Local Government Committee calendar for 3/4/2025 |
2025-02-12 | Passed on Second Consideration, refer to Senate State and Local Government Committee |
2025-02-10 | Introduced, Passed on First Consideration |
Why Relevant: The bill's explicit purpose is to streamline government operations by replacing outdated fax submissions with electronic transmissions, thereby improving efficiency and modernizing communication processes across agencies and courts.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agencies and courts to accept electronic documents and by updating legal definitions and procedures, the bill reduces administrative burdens, speeds up document processing, and facilitates more efficient inter-agency and public communication.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent and mechanisms; the only ambiguity may be in the discretion given to courts to develop their own procedures, but the overarching mandate to promote efficiency is explicit.
Legislation ID: 129877
Bill URL: View Bill
H.B. No. 12 amends the Government Code to establish clearer definitions and requirements for regulatory agencies and their reviews. It mandates that state agencies post notices of reviews on their websites, solicit public input, and undergo efficiency audits. Additionally, it introduces provisions for limited reviews of regulatory agencies and requires the establishment of an implementation plan for audit recommendations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-20 | Effective on 9/1/25 |
2025-06-20 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-05-26 | Sent to the Governor |
2025-05-25 | Signed in the House |
2025-05-25 | Signed in the Senate |
2025-05-24 | Reported enrolled |
2025-05-23 | House concurs in Senate amendment(s)-reported |
2025-05-23 | House concurs in Senate amendment(s) |
Why Relevant: The bill creates and strengthens structural and procedural mechanisms (audits, reviews, implementation plans, public input processes) explicitly aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular efficiency audits, requiring implementation plans, enabling limited reviews for deficiencies, and recommending operational improvements and consolidations, the bill directly targets cost savings, streamlining, and modernization of government functions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 203726
Bill URL: View Bill
H.B. No. 1545 introduces a structured sunset review process for certain governmental entities, including the Texas Funeral Service Commission and the Texas Juvenile Justice Department. It sets forth guidelines for limited-scope reviews, establishes sunset dates for several agencies, and amends the Texas Sunset Act to enhance oversight and reporting requirements, ultimately striving for improved effectiveness in state agency functions.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-20 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-06-20 | Effective immediately |
2025-06-02 | Sent to the Governor |
2025-06-02 | Signed in the Senate |
2025-06-02 | Signed in the House |
2025-06-02 | Reported enrolled |
2025-06-01 | House adopts conference committee report |
2025-06-01 | Senate adopts conf. comm. report-reported |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes and amends procedures for the sunset review process—a formal mechanism for evaluating the efficiency, effectiveness, and necessity of state agencies. The explicit purpose is to improve oversight, streamline government, and ensure agencies remain effective and necessary.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring regular, structured reviews and reports on agency performance, the bill empowers the legislature and oversight bodies to identify inefficiencies, duplicative functions, and opportunities for cost savings or process improvements. Agencies may be restructured, reformed, or abolished based on these findings.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent and mechanisms; the sunset process is well-defined in Texas law as a tool for government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 21372
Bill URL: View Bill
H.B. ANo. A2818 creates a new division focused on artificial intelligence within the Texas Department of Information Resources. This division will oversee the use of generative AI technology to modernize legacy systems and assist state agencies in their projects. The bill also mandates the preparation of cost analysis reports to evaluate the benefits of using AI technology compared to traditional methods.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-20 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-06-20 | Effective on 9/1/25 |
2025-05-31 | Signed in the Senate |
2025-05-31 | Sent to the Governor |
2025-05-30 | Signed in the House |
2025-05-29 | Reported enrolled |
2025-05-28 | House concurs in Senate amendment(s)-reported |
2025-05-28 | House concurs in Senate amendment(s) |
Why Relevant: The bill creates a permanent division specifically focused on identifying and implementing technology solutions (AI) to modernize government operations, streamline processes, and achieve cost savings. It also mandates structured analysis and reporting on efficiency gains, directly targeting government effectiveness and resource use.
Mechanism of Influence: By centralizing AI initiatives and requiring cost-benefit analysis reports, the division will drive the adoption of more efficient technologies, reduce duplication, and provide data to support further modernization. Mandated coordination and oversight help prevent fragmented efforts and ensure government-wide improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill’s language is explicit about the goals of efficiency and modernization, with clear requirements for reporting and coordination. There is little ambiguity regarding its intent to improve government operations.
Legislation ID: 205891
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends the Government Code to establish a management-to-staff ratio for state agencies, specifically limiting the number of management positions to one for every 11 non-managerial positions. It requires agencies to develop procedures to minimize management roles while maintaining necessary functions. Additionally, it repeals a previous provision related to employment in management positions for agencies with over 100 full-time equivalent employees.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-13 | Referred to Business & Commerce |
2025-05-13 | Read first time |
2025-05-07 | Reported engrossed |
2025-05-07 | Read 3rd time |
2025-05-07 | Passed |
2025-05-07 | Record vote |
2025-05-07 | Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal |
2025-05-07 | Received from the House |
Why Relevant: The bill is explicitly designed to promote government efficiency by limiting management overhead and reducing unnecessary bureaucracy within state agencies.
Mechanism of Influence: By capping the number of management positions relative to staff and requiring agencies to justify and minimize management roles, the bill aims to streamline agency operations, reduce administrative costs, and ensure resources are focused on service delivery rather than management layers.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not specify detailed enforcement mechanisms or define what constitutes 'necessary' management functions, leaving some discretion to agencies in implementation.
Legislation ID: 206119
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends various sections of the Government Code related to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and establishes guidelines for auditing state agencies, reviewing procurement activities, and evaluating the need for state agency functions. It emphasizes the importance of strategic fiscal reviews and public accountability, particularly in the context of relocating state agency headquarters to achieve cost savings.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-27 | Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency |
2025-03-27 | Read first time |
2025-03-06 | Filed |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes and empowers the Department of Government Efficiency, a permanent entity charged with identifying and implementing cost savings, streamlining agency operations, and improving fiscal accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agency reports on necessity, mandating strategic fiscal reviews, and evaluating the cost-effectiveness of relocating agency headquarters, the bill creates procedural mechanisms to assess and enhance government efficiency. The department's duties include verifying agency reports, conducting audits, and making recommendations for agency abolishment or consolidation, all aimed at improving operational effectiveness and reducing costs.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent to promote government efficiency through structural and procedural reforms. The language is specific regarding the duties and processes involved, leaving little ambiguity about its relevance to government efficiency.
Legislation ID: 206535
Bill URL: View Bill
H.B. No. 4395 amends Chapter 1202 of the Government Code to facilitate electronic submission and delivery of public securities and related documents. It mandates that issuers electronically submit relevant documents to the attorney general, who will also deliver them to the comptroller in an electronic format. The attorney general is responsible for informing legal authorities about these new requirements by December 1, 2025. The bill establishes that the new electronic provisions will only apply to submissions made after the effective date of the act, which is set for January 1, 2026.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-20 | Effective on 1/1/26 |
2025-06-20 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-05-28 | Sent to the Governor |
2025-05-27 | Signed in the Senate |
2025-05-27 | Signed in the House |
2025-05-26 | Reported enrolled |
2025-05-26 | Senate passage reported |
2025-05-25 | Rules suspended-Regular order of business |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to modernize and streamline the process for submitting public securities documents by mandating electronic submissions and communication. This procedural change is designed to improve efficiency in government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring electronic submissions, the bill reduces paperwork, expedites processing, and likely decreases administrative burden for both issuers and government offices. The attorney general's advisory role ensures that relevant authorities are prepared for the transition, further supporting efficient implementation.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not explicitly state 'to promote government efficiency,' but the required shift to electronic processes and advisory responsibilities are clear procedural mechanisms for streamlining and modernizing government functions.
Legislation ID: 23176
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends the Government Code to include a new section that mandates the evaluation of cost savings associated with relocating state agency headquarters located in Travis County or adjacent counties. The Texas Facilities Commission will assist in this evaluation, which will consider various factors over a 10-year period. If cost savings are determined, the agency will be required to relocate its headquarters accordingly.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-24 | Referred to Business & Commerce |
2025-02-24 | Read first time |
2025-01-29 | Received by the Secretary of the Senate |
2025-01-29 | Filed |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a structural mechanism (an evaluation process led by the Texas Facilities Commission) to identify and implement government cost savings, specifically through the potential relocation of agency headquarters. It also mandates performance reviews and reporting, which are procedural mechanisms aimed at improving government efficiency and reducing costs.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring systematic evaluations and reports regarding the cost-effectiveness of agency locations and mandating relocations when savings are found, the bill could lead to reduced government expenditures and more efficient use of resources. The performance review requirements also foster ongoing oversight and potential streamlining of agency operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its focus on cost savings and efficiency regarding agency locations. However, the process for determining 'cost savings' and how relocation decisions will be balanced against other agency needs could be subject to interpretation.
Legislation ID: 134030
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill establishes the Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office and the Texas Regulatory Efficiency Advisory Panel to enhance the efficiency of rulemaking processes and regulatory requirements imposed by state agencies. It aims to identify unnecessary rules, improve public access to regulatory information, and ensure that rules are written in plain language. The bill also modifies existing laws regarding the judicial review of agency rules, emphasizing that courts are not required to defer to agency interpretations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-23 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-04-23 | Effective on 9/1/25 |
2025-04-14 | Signed in the House |
2025-04-14 | Sent to the Governor |
2025-04-10 | Signed in the Senate |
2025-04-09 | Additional sponsor(s) authorized |
2025-04-09 | Record vote |
2025-04-09 | Passed |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes new entities (the Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office and Advisory Panel) specifically to identify and implement regulatory efficiency measures, including reducing unnecessary rules and streamlining processes.
Mechanism of Influence: Creates permanent and advisory bodies within the governor's office tasked with reviewing, recommending, and assisting in the implementation of efficiency measures across state agencies. Mandates regular reporting and publication of best practices to drive continuous improvement.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 211503
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends the Government Code to establish clearer definitions and procedures for the review and audit of state agencies, particularly regulatory agencies. It mandates public participation in the review process, requires agencies to notify stakeholders about reviews, and introduces efficiency audits to evaluate the effectiveness of agency operations. The bill also outlines the responsibilities of the Sunset Advisory Commission in conducting these audits and reporting findings to the legislature.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-17 | Referred to Business & Commerce |
2025-03-17 | Read first time |
2025-03-05 | Received by the Secretary of the Senate |
2025-03-05 | Filed |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes and empowers mechanisms (efficiency audits, Sunset Advisory Commission reviews) to evaluate and improve government agency efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: Mandates recurring efficiency audits, requires implementation of audit recommendations, and updates reporting requirements to focus on performance and efficiency. These structural and procedural mechanisms are explicitly aimed at streamlining government operations and reducing inefficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 134451
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends the Government Code to modify the composition of the legislative audit committee and mandates a compliance audit of counties with populations over one million to ensure proper use of federal funds received after January 1, 2021. The State Auditor is required to conduct this audit by January 1, 2026, and report the findings, with the provision set to expire on January 1, 2027.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-31 | Reported favorably w/o amendments |
2025-03-31 | Committee report printed and distributed |
2025-03-27 | Considered in public hearing |
2025-03-27 | Vote taken in committee |
2025-03-24 | Considered in public hearing |
2025-03-24 | Left pending in committee |
2025-03-24 | Scheduled for public hearing on . . . |
2025-03-17 | Referred to Local Government |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly requires a compliance audit of large counties' use of federal funds, aiming to ensure proper and efficient use of government resources.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating an audit and reporting on the use of federal funds, the bill establishes a procedural mechanism to evaluate county-level government performance and financial compliance, which can identify inefficiencies or misuses and potentially drive improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill focuses on compliance with federal fund usage rather than broader government efficiency, but ensuring proper use of funds is directly related to efficient government operations.
Why Relevant: The bill updates the composition of the legislative audit committee, which oversees government audits and accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: By restructuring the audit committee, the bill could improve oversight and the effectiveness of government audits, indirectly promoting government efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The change in committee composition alone does not guarantee efficiency improvements, but it is structurally relevant to oversight functions.
Legislation ID: 211953
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill amends specific sections of the Texas Government Code and Special District Local Laws Code to include various governmental entities under the Texas Sunset Act. The bill outlines the conditions under which these entities will be subject to review and specifies that they may be abolished unless continued in existence. The entities affected include the Texas Lottery Commission, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Ethics Commission, Department of Information Resources, and several river authorities. The bill aims to enhance accountability and oversight of these governmental bodies by requiring regular reviews.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-24 | Amendment(s) considered in committee |
2025-05-24 | Failed to receive affirmative vote in comm. |
2025-05-24 | Considered in formal meeting |
2025-05-02 | Read first time |
2025-05-02 | Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency |
2025-05-01 | Read 3rd time |
2025-05-01 | Record vote |
2025-05-01 | Rules suspended-Regular order of business |
Why Relevant: The Texas Sunset Act is a statutory process designed to increase government efficiency and effectiveness by requiring periodic reviews of the performance and necessity of agencies, with the potential for restructuring or abolishing them.
Mechanism of Influence: By subjecting these entities to the Sunset review process, the bill establishes a recurring, structured evaluation mechanism aimed at identifying inefficiencies, eliminating unnecessary functions, and improving government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill itself does not prescribe specific efficiency measures, the explicit purpose of the Sunset Act is to promote government efficiency and accountability. The bill's language directly ties these entities to that process.
Legislation ID: 135278
Bill URL: View Bill
The bill mandates a review of various advisory entities under the jurisdiction of the comptroller. It requires the comptroller to assess the necessity and operational efficiency of these entities and report findings to the legislature by December 2026. Additionally, it amends certain sections of the Government Code and repeals others to streamline processes related to these advisory entities.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-06-20 | Signed by the Governor |
2025-06-20 | Effective immediately |
2025-06-03 | Sent to the Governor |
2025-06-02 | Signed in the House |
2025-06-02 | Signed in the Senate |
2025-06-01 | Record vote |
2025-06-01 | Senate adopts conference committee report |
2025-06-01 | Senate adopts conf. comm. report-reported |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a mandated review process to evaluate the necessity and efficiency of government advisory entities, with the explicit goal of streamlining and potentially eliminating unnecessary or ineffective bodies.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring the comptroller to assess and report on the operational efficiency of advisory entities, the bill creates a structural mechanism for identifying and acting on inefficiencies within government operations. The amendments and repeals to the Government Code further support efforts to streamline processes.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent to promote efficiency by reviewing and potentially eliminating unnecessary or ineffective advisory entities. The language is clear about the goal of improving government operations.
Legislation ID: 210522
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill introduces the Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office to identify and implement efficiencies in rule adoption, regulatory review, and contested case processes. It also establishes the Texas Regulatory Efficiency Advisory Panel to provide expertise and recommendations for improving regulatory practices. The office and panel will work together to analyze existing regulations, reduce unnecessary rules, and enhance public access to information regarding state agency regulations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-13 | Read first time |
2025-02-13 | Referred to Business & Commerce |
2025-01-27 | Received by the Secretary of the Senate |
2025-01-27 | Filed |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes new governmental entities (an office and an advisory panel) whose stated mission is to improve the efficiency of regulatory processes, reduce unnecessary rules, and coordinate inter-agency efforts.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating the Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office and Advisory Panel, the bill sets up permanent structural mechanisms to review, streamline, and modernize regulatory functions. The required manuals, guides, and reports are procedural mechanisms to drive and track efficiency improvements.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is clear that the primary goal is regulatory efficiency and reduction. The scope is broad but is anchored to regulatory processes, not all government operations.
Legislation ID: 104770
Bill URL: View Bill
H.B. 215 amends existing provisions related to the legislative auditor generals duties, including authority over audits, information requests, and responses from entities. It seeks to enhance the auditors ability to oversee the Utah System of Higher Education and introduces measures to prevent interference with audits. The bill also makes technical adjustments to existing laws and defines the roles and responsibilities of the auditor general and audited entities.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-07 | Senate/ strike enacting clause |
2025-03-07 | House/ filed |
2025-03-07 | Senate/ to House |
2025-03-07 | House/ received from Senate |
2025-03-05 | Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules |
2025-02-24 | Senate/ committee report favorable |
2025-02-24 | Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar |
2025-02-24 | Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to improve government efficiency and effectiveness by enhancing the legislative auditor general's ability to conduct thorough audits, monitor internal controls, and ensure corrective action in response to findings.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring audit response plans, empowering the auditor general to review internal audit effectiveness, and mandating cooperation from audited entities, the bill introduces structural and procedural mechanisms to identify inefficiencies, enforce accountability, and promote cost savings and improved performance in government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is specific in its focus on audit functions and oversight within the Utah System of Higher Education and related government entities. The language is clear about its intent to strengthen audit mechanisms for efficiency and accountability.
This bill amends and enacts provisions related to efficiency improvement processes and certain funding requirements in the Governors Office of Planning and Budget. It includes criteria for nonlapsing funds, processes for evaluating efficiency, and reporting requirements to ensure accountability and recognition of cost-saving measures.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-19 | Governor Signed |
2025-03-12 | House/ to Governor |
2025-03-12 | House/ received enrolled bill from Printing |
2025-03-07 | Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate |
2025-03-07 | House/ enrolled bill to Printing |
2025-03-04 | Bill Received from House for Enrolling |
2025-03-04 | Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared |
2025-03-03 | House/ received from Senate |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly establishes a process for evaluating government efficiency and requires annual reporting on efficiency metrics, with a focus on identifying cost-saving and time-saving opportunities.
Mechanism of Influence: It empowers the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget and the Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst to systematically review and improve government processes, mandates regular measurement and reporting of efficiency outcomes, and provides a structural mechanism for ongoing oversight.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is clear that the goal is government efficiency, as evidenced by the requirement for annual progress reports and evaluations focused on cost and time savings.
Why Relevant: The criteria for nonlapsing appropriations are included to ensure responsible fiscal management, which supports efficiency by allowing more flexible and accountable use of funds.
Mechanism of Influence: By clarifying how appropriations can remain available across fiscal years, the provision supports long-term efficiency initiatives that may require multi-year funding.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the primary focus is on financial management, its inclusion in an efficiency-focused bill suggests it is intended to support the broader goal of government efficiency.
This bill amends the duties of the state auditor, specifically mandating the preparation of an annual report that includes the total balance of cash, cash equivalents, and investments held by each entity managing public funds. This initiative aims to ensure better oversight of public finances and promote fiscal responsibility among state entities.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-25 | Governor Signed |
2025-03-12 | House/ received enrolled bill from Printing |
2025-03-12 | House/ to Governor |
2025-03-07 | Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate |
2025-03-07 | House/ enrolled bill to Printing |
2025-03-06 | Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared |
2025-03-06 | Bill Received from House for Enrolling |
2025-03-05 | House/ received from Senate |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly aims to promote government efficiency and fiscal responsibility through mandated audits, public reporting, and standardized accounting procedures.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring regular audits, public disclosure of financial information, and standardized accounting, the bill seeks to uncover inefficiencies, ensure proper use of funds, and facilitate corrective actions, thereby streamlining government operations and improving oversight.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's language is clear in its intent to promote efficiency and effectiveness in government operations, especially through its mandates for audits, annual reporting, and uniform accounting procedures.
This bill enacts and amends provisions regarding the legislative auditor generals authority, including the ability to request information from entities, manage audit processes, and handle privileged information. It also establishes protocols for contesting privilege claims and monitoring the operations of the Utah System of Higher Education.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-25 | Governor Signed |
2025-03-14 | Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing |
2025-03-14 | Senate/ to Governor |
2025-03-12 | Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing |
2025-03-12 | Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate |
2025-03-11 | Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared |
2025-03-11 | Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling |
2025-03-08 | Senate/ received from House |
Why Relevant: The bill specifically strengthens the legislative auditor general's capacity to monitor and evaluate government entities through audits, including setting protocols for reporting, monitoring internal audits, and handling privileged information. These measures are directly intended to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of government oversight and operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring regular audit reports, empowering the auditor general to request information (even privileged items), and monitoring internal audit health, the bill establishes structural mechanisms for continuous evaluation and improvement of government performance. The use of subpoenas and independence protections further bolster the auditor’s effectiveness in uncovering inefficiencies or misconduct.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill clearly focuses on audit processes and oversight, it does not explicitly state that the sole or primary purpose is to promote government efficiency. However, the structure and intent of audit functions generally target improved efficiency and accountability.
The bill proposes changes to existing laws regarding privatization contracts within the Vermont Executive Branch. It defines privatization contracts, establishes standards for contracting, outlines procedures for entering such contracts, and mandates fiscal and operational assessments of privatization impacts. The goal is to enhance transparency, ensure fair wages, and protect employee rights while managing privatization efforts.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-26 | Read first time and referred to the Committee on [Government Operations and Military Affairs] |
Why Relevant: The bill requires an assessment of the fiscal and operational impacts of proposed changes to privatization contracts, including analysis of cost savings. This provision explicitly aims to evaluate government performance and cost efficiency related to contracting out services.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating fiscal and operational assessments, the bill creates a structural mechanism for evaluating whether privatization leads to cost savings or improved efficiency, directly tying contract approval to efficiency goals.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill does not create a permanent body or commission, but it does require systematic evaluation of efficiency as part of the contract approval process.
Legislation ID: 195762
Bill URL: View Bill
The bill seeks to create a committee dedicated to overseeing government performance and ensuring that legislation meets its intended goals. It includes provisions for the committees structure, duties, and powers, as well as updates to reporting requirements for state agencies. The act emphasizes the importance of evidence-based policy and accountability in government operations.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-01 | Rep. [Scheu of Middlebury] moved that the Committee on [Appropriations] be relieved of the bill and that the same be recommitted to the Committee on [Government Operations and Military Affairs], which was agreed to |
2025-03-12 | Referred to Committee on [Appropriations] per Rule 35(a) |
2025-03-12 | Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment |
2025-01-23 | Read first time and referred to the Committee on [Government Operations and Military Affairs] |
Why Relevant: The bill directly creates a permanent committee focused on government oversight, performance, and accountability, with explicit duties to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By establishing a committee and mandating audits, reports, and evidence-based reviews, the bill sets up structural mechanisms to identify inefficiencies, recommend improvements, and ensure legislative goals are met.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The language is clear in stating the committee's purpose is to promote government efficiency and accountability. The duties and structure are well-defined, leaving little ambiguity about its intent.
This bill establishes a government efficiency portal in Washington State to gather information on government services that may be duplicative or wasteful. The portal allows state employees and the public to report inefficiencies, with provisions for anonymity. The information collected will be reviewed annually by legislative committees, and state employees whose suggestions lead to savings may receive cash awards.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-01-13 | First reading, referred to State Government, Tribal Affairs & Elections. (View Original Bill) |
2025-01-07 | Prefiled for introduction. |
Why Relevant: The bill's explicit purpose is to improve government efficiency by establishing a structural mechanism (the portal) to gather and act on reports of inefficiency, and by incentivizing cost-saving suggestions.
Mechanism of Influence: It creates a new reporting portal, mandates annual reviews by legislative committees, and provides financial incentives for state employees whose suggestions lead to savings. These measures are designed to streamline government operations and reduce waste.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
This bill addresses the states budget challenges by eliminating specific legislative reports and an advisory committee. The legislature recognizes the need to streamline operations and reduce administrative overhead, particularly in light of the governors directive for agencies to find additional savings. As a result, the bill proposes the repeal of certain sections of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) that pertain to reports and committees that have either fulfilled their original purpose or are redundant in nature.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-04-14 | First reading, referred to Ways & Means. (View Original Bill) |
Why Relevant: The bill directly targets government efficiency by eliminating specific reports and an advisory committee that are considered unnecessary, thereby reducing administrative costs and streamlining operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By repealing requirements for reports and dissolving an advisory committee, the bill reduces bureaucratic workload and administrative overhead, which are explicit structural mechanisms to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill clearly states the intent to streamline operations and reduce overhead; however, it does not specify how much cost will be saved or detail the criteria for determining redundancy.
House Bill 2008 proposes to amend and repeal several sections of the West Virginia Code to facilitate the reorganization of the executive branch. Key changes include the redesignation of the Department of Economic Development, the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security, and the abolishment of the Department of Arts, Culture, and History. The bill also specifies that starting July 1, 2025, new hires and position transfers within these departments will be classified as exempt from state grievance procedures, thus streamlining operations and governance within the executive branch.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-07-31 | Chapter 135, Acts, Regular Session, 2025 |
2025-07-22 | Chapter 139, Acts, Regular Session, 2025 |
2025-04-25 | Approved by Governor 4/25/2025 |
2025-04-22 | To Governor 4/22/2025 |
2025-04-12 | To Governor 4/22/2025 - Senate Journal |
2025-04-12 | Approved by Governor 4/25/2025 - House Journal |
2025-04-12 | To Governor 4/22/2025 - House Journal |
2025-04-12 | Approved by Governor 4/25/2025 - Senate Journal |
Why Relevant: The bill directly addresses government efficiency by reorganizing executive branch departments, consolidating or abolishing certain entities, and streamlining administrative processes.
Mechanism of Influence: By abolishing, redesignating, and restructuring departments (such as establishing the Department of Homeland Security and abolishing the Department of Arts, Culture, and History), the bill aims to reduce overlap, clarify responsibilities, and potentially cut costs. Exempting new hires and transfers from grievance procedures is intended to make personnel management more agile and less encumbered by bureaucratic processes.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill focuses on reorganization and streamlining, it does not explicitly mandate cost savings or efficiency studies, but the intent to improve efficiency is clear from the structural changes it proposes.
Legislation ID: 97252
Bill URL: View Bill
House Bill 3411 proposes significant amendments to the West Virginia Code, particularly targeting the structure and composition of various legislative commissions. The bill seeks to continue the Commission on Special Investigations while removing legislative members from certain commissions and repealing outdated provisions. The intention is to modernize and clarify the roles of these commissions in state governance.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-07-31 | Chapter 143, Acts, Regular Session, 2025 |
2025-07-22 | Chapter 147, Acts, Regular Session, 2025 |
2025-04-28 | Approved by Governor 4/28/2025 |
2025-04-21 | To Governor 4/21/2025 |
2025-04-12 | Completed legislative action |
2025-04-12 | Communicated to Senate |
2025-04-12 | House Message received |
2025-04-12 | Effective from passage (Roll No. 612) |
Why Relevant: The bill mandates regular reviews of state agencies and regulatory boards for effectiveness and efficiency, which directly targets government efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring periodic agency and board reviews, the government can identify inefficiencies, duplications, and areas for improvement, and implement corrective actions.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill continues and clarifies the structure of the Commission on Special Investigations, which has oversight functions that can uncover inefficiencies and promote accountability.
Mechanism of Influence: A well-defined and empowered commission can investigate waste or mismanagement, leading to improved government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill gives the Joint Committee on Government Operations expanded powers to access records, hold hearings, and issue subpoenas, all of which support oversight and efficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: These powers enable the committee to monitor agency performance, investigate inefficiencies, and recommend reforms.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill requires compliance reviews to ensure that recommendations for efficiency are actually implemented.
Mechanism of Influence: By following up on previous reviews, the government can track progress on efficiency measures and hold agencies accountable for making changes.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Why Relevant: The bill mandates department presentations to a legislative committee, which increases transparency and allows for the identification of inefficiencies.
Mechanism of Influence: Regular presentations force departments to justify their operations and expenditures, encouraging efficiency and compliance.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: None
Legislation ID: 72620
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 452 proposes significant amendments to the West Virginia Code, particularly concerning the Department of Commerce and its associated divisions. It seeks to establish the Division of Economic Development under the Department of Commerce, exempt new hires and employees transferring positions from state grievance procedures, and abolish the Department of Arts, Culture, and History, redistributing its functions to the Department of Tourism. The bill also outlines the authority of various secretaries and the Governor regarding appointments and operational procedures, effective July 1, 2025.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-02-13 | Filed for introduction |
2025-02-13 | Introduced in Senate |
2025-02-13 | To Government Organization |
Why Relevant: The bill explicitly restructures government entities, consolidates departments, and reassigns functions, which are direct mechanisms for improving efficiency and reducing duplication in government operations.
Mechanism of Influence: By creating the Division of Economic Development, abolishing a separate department, and transferring its functions, the bill aims to streamline bureaucratic processes and potentially reduce administrative costs. The exemption from grievance procedures could also be intended to increase operational agility, though it may have other implications for employee rights.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill clearly reorganizes government structure, it does not always state that the explicit goal is efficiency or cost savings, though such outcomes are generally understood to be the rationale for such moves. The exemption from grievance procedures is presented as a structural change, but its efficiency rationale is implied rather than stated.
Legislation ID: 72738
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 570 amends existing provisions of the West Virginia Code to require agencies to include economic impact statements with certain proposed legislative rules. These statements will analyze the potential costs and economic effects of the rules on business operations, job creation, and overall economic growth. The bill aims to enhance transparency and accountability in the rule-making process by ensuring that economic considerations are taken into account when new rules are proposed.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-27 | Read 3rd time |
2025-03-27 | On 3rd reading |
2025-03-27 | Passed Senate (Roll No. 194) |
2025-03-27 | Ordered to House |
2025-03-27 | To Finance |
2025-03-27 | To House Finance |
2025-03-27 | House received Senate message |
2025-03-27 | Introduced in House |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes a structural mechanism (mandatory economic impact statements) that agencies must use when proposing rules, with the explicit purpose of improving transparency and accountability in government operations. By requiring economic analyses, it aims to ensure that new regulations are scrutinized for their cost and efficiency impacts, potentially leading to more efficient government rule-making.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agencies to analyze and disclose the economic impact of proposed rules, the legislation creates a procedural check that could deter inefficient or unnecessarily costly regulations, encourage more cost-effective rule-making, and support better-informed legislative oversight.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill focuses specifically on economic impact in the context of rule-making, not on broader government efficiency initiatives. Its scope is limited to the regulatory process rather than overall agency operations or inter-agency coordination.
Legislation ID: 97006
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 932 aims to amend the Code of West Virginia to combine the offices of the Legislative Auditor and the State Auditor into a single office effective July 1, 2025. This consolidation is intended to transfer the powers, duties, and responsibilities of the Legislative Auditor to the State Auditor, thereby enhancing efficiency in state auditing functions.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-24 | To Government Organization then Finance |
2025-03-24 | Filed for introduction |
2025-03-24 | Introduced in Senate |
2025-03-24 | To Government Organization |
Why Relevant: The bill proposes a structural consolidation of two government offices with the explicit goal of enhancing efficiency in state auditing.
Mechanism of Influence: By merging duplicative offices and centralizing audit functions, the bill aims to streamline bureaucratic processes, reduce administrative overlap, and potentially lower operational costs.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's summary clearly states the efficiency goal, and the mechanism (merger of offices) is straightforward. However, the specific methods for achieving efficiency beyond consolidation are not detailed.
Legislation ID: 156521
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill mandates that each chapter of the Wisconsin Administrative Code will expire seven years after its creation or last readoption unless it is actively renewed by the respective agency. The Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) is tasked with creating a schedule for the expiration of existing code chapters. Additionally, the bill stipulates that agencies must avoid using outdated or derogatory language in their rules.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-08-11 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-30 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-13 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-12 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-03 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-02 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-05-30 | Introduced by Representatives Neylon, Tusler, Armstrong, Behnke, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Duchow, Goeben, Green, Gustafson, B. Jacobson, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Melotik, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, OConnor, Piwowarczyk, Rodriguez, Sortwell, Tittl, Tranel, Wichgers and Wittke; cosponsored by Senators Nass, Bradley, Quinn, Kapenga, Tomczyk, Hutton, Stafsholt, Cabral-Guevara and Feyen |
2025-05-30 | Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Accountability, and Transparency |
Why Relevant: The bill directly establishes a structural, recurring review and expiration mechanism for administrative rules, explicitly designed to prevent outdated, redundant, or unnecessary regulations from persisting. This periodic review process is a structural mechanism to promote government efficiency and responsiveness.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring regular review and renewal, the bill forces agencies to justify the continued existence of each rule, potentially reducing regulatory burden and streamlining government operations. The involvement of legislative oversight adds an additional layer of scrutiny, encouraging efficiency and relevance in administrative regulations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill's intent to promote efficiency is implicit in its structure (automatic expiration and review), though it does not use the word 'efficiency' explicitly. However, the design and rationale are clearly aimed at reducing unnecessary bureaucracy.
Legislation ID: 156527
Bill URL: View Bill
Assembly Bill 277 modifies the requirements for economic impact analyses of proposed administrative rules. Under current law, only rules expected to impose over $10 million in costs are subject to certain requirements. This bill expands the scope to include any proposed rule that is expected to impose any costs on businesses, local governments, or individuals. The bill mandates that agencies must halt work on such rules until they either modify the rules to eliminate costs, obtain legislative approval, or offset costs with other rules. Additionally, it requires a detailed quantification of both costs and savings in the economic impact analysis.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-30 | Introduced by Representatives Gustafson, Nedweski, Knodl, Armstrong, Penterman, OConnor, Mursau, Krug, Maxey, Green, Murphy, B. Jacobson, Dittrich, Tranel, Piwowarczyk, Kreibich, Gundrum, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Behnke, Goeben, Donovan, Kaufert, Tittl, Melotik, Wichgers and Wittke; cosponsored by Senators Bradley, Quinn, Tomczyk, Nass, Kapenga, Feyen, Cabral-Guevara and Hutton |
2025-05-30 | Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Accountability, and Transparency |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes stricter procedural requirements for agencies to analyze and justify the costs of new rules, with the explicit goal of controlling and potentially reducing regulatory burdens and associated costs. This aligns with the objective of improving government efficiency and reducing unnecessary administrative costs.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring detailed economic analyses for all rules with any cost, mandating cost elimination or legislative approval, and allowing cost offsets, the bill directly targets regulatory inefficiencies and aims to streamline rulemaking. It introduces a structural check on agency actions to ensure cost-effectiveness and responsiveness.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill does not create a new entity or commission, it imposes procedural mechanisms specifically designed to enhance efficiency in government operations. The intent to promote efficiency is explicit in the requirements for cost analysis and offsets.
Legislation ID: 156363
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill modifies the existing laws regarding statements of scope for administrative rules. It limits agencies to one permanent or one emergency rule per statement of scope and specifies the expiration periods for these statements. Emergency rules will expire after six months, while permanent rules will continue to have a 30-month expiration period. The bill aims to streamline the rule-making process and ensure that agencies specify the type of rule they intend to promulgate.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-07-24 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-25 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-20 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-16 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-13 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-12 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-05-28 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-05-21 | Introduced by Senators Hutton, Bradley, Tomczyk, Nass, Kapenga, Feyen, Cabral-Guevara and Stafsholt; cosponsored by Representatives Knodl, Nedweski, Armstrong, Penterman, OConnor, Tusler, Mursau, Maxey, Green, Murphy, Dittrich, Tranel, Gustafson, Moses, Piwowarczyk, Neylon, Gundrum, Dallman, Callahan, Donovan, B. Jacobson, Behnke, Goeben, Kaufert, Tittl, Rodriguez, Wichgers and Wittke |
Why Relevant: The bill's explicit purpose is to streamline the administrative rulemaking process, which directly addresses government efficiency by reducing procedural ambiguity and potential bureaucratic delays.
Mechanism of Influence: By requiring agencies to specify the type of rule and limiting statements of scope, the bill reduces the risk of overlapping or duplicative rulemaking efforts, making the process more orderly and efficient. Setting expiration periods also prevents outdated or unnecessary rulemaking from lingering.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is clear in its intent and mechanisms; however, the actual impact on efficiency would depend on agency compliance and the volume of rules processed.
Legislation ID: 156370
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 277 establishes a framework for the expiration of each chapter of the Wisconsin Administrative Code after a period of seven years unless the chapter is readopted. It mandates that agencies notify the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) of their intention to readopt a chapter, and outlines the process for objections to such readoptions. The bill also emphasizes the importance of using updated language in rules to avoid outdated or offensive terms.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-08-15 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-30 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-23 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-20 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-18 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-10 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-05 | Fiscal estimate received |
2025-06-04 | Fiscal estimate received |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes a recurring sunset and review process for administrative rules, requiring agencies to periodically justify and renew regulations. This mechanism is explicitly designed to prevent outdated or unnecessary rules from persisting, which is a structural approach to streamlining government operations and reducing regulatory inefficiency.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating the expiration and review of administrative code chapters, the bill forces agencies to evaluate the necessity and relevance of their regulations regularly. This can lead to the elimination of redundant or obsolete rules, reducing administrative burden and potentially improving government efficiency.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: While the bill's main purpose is regulatory review, it does not establish a new commission or task force; instead, it modifies procedural requirements for existing agencies and the JCRAR. The efficiency gains depend on how rigorously agencies and the legislature conduct reviews.
Legislation ID: 156376
Bill URL: View Bill
Senate Bill 289 modifies the requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose costs on businesses, local governmental units, and individuals. Currently, rules that are expected to pass along $10,000,000 or more in costs require additional steps before they can be promulgated. This bill lowers that threshold to any amount of expected costs and requires agencies to halt work on proposed rules until they either modify them to eliminate costs, obtain legislative approval, or demonstrate that other rules can offset the costs. Furthermore, it mandates that agencies include estimated cost savings in their economic impact analyses.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-05-30 | Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs |
2025-05-30 | Introduced by Senators Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Feyen, Hutton, Kapenga, Nass, Quinn, Stafsholt and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Gustafson, Nedweski, Armstrong, Behnke, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Donovan, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, B. Jacobson, Kaufert, Knodl, Kreibich, Krug, Maxey, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, Neylon, OConnor, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Tittl, Tranel, Tusler, Wichgers and Wittke |
Why Relevant: The bill directly targets government efficiency by imposing new requirements for agencies to identify, quantify, and reduce regulatory costs, and by mandating cost savings analysis in rulemaking.
Mechanism of Influence: It streamlines bureaucratic processes by requiring agencies to halt costly rulemaking unless costs are eliminated or offset, fosters transparency and accountability through economic impact analyses, and incentivizes agencies to consider cost-saving reforms.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is specific in its requirements for cost analysis and thresholds, leaving little ambiguity about its focus on efficiency. However, the effectiveness of these measures may depend on implementation and the quality of analyses produced.
Legislation ID: 13873
Bill URL: View Bill
This bill establishes a framework for the legislative review of administrative rules by requiring a regulatory impact analysis to be conducted for each rule submitted. The analysis must include an evaluation of costs, benefits, and alternatives, and must be made available to legislators and the public. It also includes provisions for the appropriation of funds to support this process and outlines the timeline for implementation.
Date | Action |
---|---|
2025-03-06 | Assigned Chapter Number 128 |
2025-03-04 | Governor Vetoed SEA No. 0059 |
2025-02-28 | H Speaker Signed SEA No. 0059 |
2025-02-28 | S President Signed SEA No. 0059 |
2025-02-27 | Assigned Number SEA No. 0059 |
2025-02-26 | H Appointed JCC01 Members |
2025-02-25 | S Appointed JCC01 Members |
2025-02-25 | S Concur:Failed 0-30-1-0-0 |
Why Relevant: The bill establishes a formal review process aimed at evaluating the efficiency and necessity of administrative rules, with a focus on cost-benefit analysis and consideration of alternatives. This is a structural mechanism explicitly designed to improve government efficiency and transparency.
Mechanism of Influence: By mandating regular, systematic regulatory impact analyses, the bill seeks to prevent unnecessary or inefficient rules from being enacted, encourage cost savings, and ensure that only beneficial regulations are implemented. This could reduce bureaucratic burdens and improve the effectiveness of government operations.
Evidence:
Ambiguity Notes: The bill is explicit in its intent to evaluate costs, benefits, and alternatives, which are standard metrics for assessing efficiency. There is little ambiguity about its purpose.