State AI Legislation Report, 2026, first month

Index of Bills

• House - 28 - Support Kids Online Safety Act
• Senate - 64 - Elections

Summary

This resolution calls on the U.S. Congress to adopt the Kids Online Safety Act, which seeks to implement safety measures for minors using online platforms. It highlights the risks associated with online use, including exposure to harmful content and mental health issues, and advocates for protections such as privacy safeguards and parental controls.

Key Sections

• Call for Legislative Action: The resolution calls for Congress to pass the Kids Online Safety Act (S. 1748) to implement safety measures for minors online.
• Establishment of Advisory Council: The Kids Online Safety Act proposes the creation of a Kids Online Safety Council to advise on best practices for protecting minors.
• Protection Measures for Minors: The Kids Online Safety Act would require platforms to provide tools for privacy management and restrict harmful features.
• Transparency and Accountability: The resolution emphasizes the need for transparency requirements and accountability measures for online platforms.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

The bill addresses various aspects of political communication, particularly focusing on synthetic media and its implications for voter perception. It also outlines regulations for outdoor advertising near highways, procedures for voter registration, and the dissemination of election-related information. Additionally, it mandates a report on expanding early voting options in rural and low-income areas, highlighting the need for accessible voting practices.

Key Sections

• Applicability of Amendments: Clarifies that certain amendments apply only to offenses committed after the bills effective date.
• Applicability of Amendments: Specifies that certain amendments to election laws apply only to offenses committed after the effective date of the act.
• Campaign Sign Regulations: This provision outlines the rules for the placement and size of political campaign signs near highways and public spaces.
• Data Security and Reporting: Establishes security protocols for handling data related to permanent fund dividend applications and requires annual reporting to the legislature.
• Definition of Interactive Computer Service: Defines interactive computer service as any service enabling computer access to multiple users, including internet services and educational institution systems.
• Definition of Political Communication: Defines political communication and establishes criteria for what constitutes an exhortation to vote for or against a candidate based on the medium used.
• Definition of Synthetic Media: Defines synthetic media as AI-manipulated images, audio, or videos that create realistic but false representations of individuals, excluding minor edits or enhancements.
• Definition of Synthetic Media: Defines synthetic media as manipulated images, audio, or video that create realistic but false representations of individuals, distinguishing between significant alterations and minimal edits.
• Definitions: This section defines key terms related to electioneering communication, artificial intelligence, interactive computer services, and synthetic media, establishing a framework for understanding the bills implications.
• Early Voting Report: Mandates a report by the division of elections on options for expanding early voting in rural and low-income neighborhoods.
• Effective Date: Specifies the effective date for certain amendments to the law.
• Effective Date: This provision specifies that the act will take effect on July 1, 2026, allowing for the implementation of its various components.
• Effective Date of the Act: Establishes that the act will take effect on July 1, 2026.
• Effective Date of the Act: Establishes the effective date for the provisions of the act as July 1, 2026.
• Permanent Fund Dividend Application: Modifies the application process for the permanent fund dividend to include voter registration information and options for applicants.
• Preregistration for Minors: This section allows individuals aged 16 to 18 to preregister to vote, ensuring they are automatically registered when they reach voting age.
• Preservation of Statements and Reports: Mandates the preservation of election-related statements and reports for six years and outlines where copies should be maintained.
• Publication of Reports: Amends the publication requirements for reports filed under election law to ensure public accessibility via the commissions website.
• Publication of Reports: Updates the requirements for the publication and availability of election-related reports and statements to the public.
• Publication of Reports and Statements: Updates the requirements for public access to reports filed by public officials and the retention of such documents by the commission.
• Public Official Financial Disclosures: This section mandates the public availability of financial disclosures filed by public officials, ensuring transparency in government.
• Redistricting Board Inclusion: Adds the Redistricting Board to the definition of public entities under state law.
• Regulations on Outdoor Advertising: Amends regulations regarding outdoor advertising near highways, specifying exceptions for certain types of signs and political campaign signs.
• Regulations on Outdoor Advertising: Establishes guidelines for outdoor advertising near highways, specifying exceptions for certain types of signs, including political campaign signs under specific conditions.
• Report on Early Voting: Mandates the division of elections to report on options for expanding early voting in rural and low-income areas by a specified date.
• Report on Early Voting: Requires a report by the division of elections on options for expanding early voting in rural and low-income neighborhoods by a specified date.
• Report on Early Voting: This section requires the division of elections to report on options for expanding early voting in rural and low-income areas by 2026.
• Signage Regulations: Amends regulations regarding the display of directional signs and advertising on bus benches and shelters, along with conditions for temporary political campaign signs.
• Statement Filing for Public Officials: Clarifies the filing requirements for public officials and candidates, including the provision of copies to municipal clerks.
• Synthetic Media Regulations: This section establishes definitions and regulations regarding synthetic media used in electioneering communications, aiming to prevent misinformation.
• Voter Qualifications: This provision outlines the qualifications necessary for a person to vote in elections, including citizenship, age, residency, and registration requirements.
• Voter Registration Process: This provision details the information required for voter registration, including personal identification and residency information.
• Voter Registration Process: Updates the voter registration process to include information from permanent fund dividend applicants and outlines security protocols for data handling.
• Voting Procedures for Municipal Elections: This provision specifies procedures for voters who have not registered in time for municipal elections, allowing them to vote using absentee or questioned ballots.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• House - 2245 - Veterans Claims Pilot Program
• House - 2311 - Artificial Intelligence Service; Disclosures; Requirements
• House - 2371 - Arbitration; Divorce Proceedings; Artificial Intelligence
• House - 2409 - Artificial Intelligence; Statewide Education Program
• House - 2410 - Artificial Intelligence; Privileged Communications
• House - 2490 - Rental Price Fixing; Algorithmic Pricing
• House - 2592 - Artificial Intelligence; State Agencies; Rules
• Senate - 1088 - Appropriation; Arizona Homeland Security; Cybersecurity

Summary

HB 2245 introduces a veteran claims pilot program designed to enhance the claims development process for veterans. The program will utilize technology to conduct comprehensive reviews of veterans records, identify service-connected conditions, and produce complete claim packets for submission to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The bill outlines the integration of this program with existing veteran services and mandates an evaluation of its effectiveness, including various performance indicators.

Key Sections

• Appropriation for the Program: This provision outlines the appropriation of funds for the pilot program and specifies that the funds are exempt from lapsing provisions.
• Data Privacy and Program Participation: This section ensures data privacy and outlines the conditions for veterans participation in the program.
• Program Evaluation and Reporting: This provision mandates the evaluation of the programs effectiveness and requires a report to various state leaders.
• Program Integration and Control Group: This provision details the integration of the pilot program with existing veteran services and the establishment of a control group for comparison.
• Veteran Claims Pilot Program: Establishes a pilot program in the Department of Veterans Services to evaluate claims development technology systems for processing veterans disability claims.
• Veteran Claims Pilot Program: This provision establishes the veteran claims pilot program within the Department of Veterans Services to assess the effectiveness of claims development technology systems.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

HB2311 introduces regulations for conversational AI services in Arizona, requiring operators to disclose when minors are interacting with AI, implement safety measures to protect minors from inappropriate content, and provide tools for privacy management. The bill also outlines penalties for violations and establishes protocols for handling sensitive topics like suicidal ideation.

Key Sections

• Consumer Notices and Disclosures: Operators of conversational AI services must disclose to minor account holders that they are interacting with AI, using visible disclaimers and periodic notifications during use.
• Consumer Notices and Disclosures: Operators of conversational AI services must inform minor account holders that they are interacting with AI through persistent disclaimers and regular notifications during usage.
• Crisis Response Protocols: Operators are required to have protocols in place for responding to user prompts about suicidal ideation or self-harm.
• Crisis Response Protocols: Operators are required to have protocols in place for responding to user prompts regarding suicidal ideation or self-harm, directing users to appropriate crisis services.
• Definitions: This section provides definitions for key terms used in the bill, including account holder, conversational AI service, minor, and operator.
• Definitions: This section provides definitions relevant to the bill, including terms such as account holder, conversational AI service, minor, and operator.
• Liability and Enforcement: The bill establishes civil penalties for violations and clarifies that liability does not extend to developers of AI models for third-party violations.
• Liability Limitations: The bill clarifies that developers of AI models are not liable for violations of this chapter caused by third-party AI services.
• Penalties for Violations: Operators violating the provisions of this chapter may face civil penalties or injunctions, with specific monetary penalties outlined.
• Privacy and Account Management Tools: Operators must provide tools for minors and their guardians to manage privacy and account settings, especially for those under 13 years of age.
• Privacy and Account Management Tools: Operators must provide tools for minors and their guardians to manage privacy settings and account information.
• Prohibited Uses and Safety Measures: Operators are prohibited from allowing AI services to engage minors in harmful interactions, including generating inappropriate content or misleading statements about the nature of the AI.
• Prohibited Uses of AI Services: Operators are prohibited from providing certain types of content to minor account holders, such as sexual material or statements that could mislead them into thinking they are interacting with a human.
• Prohibition on Misleading Health Claims: Operators must not program their AI services to represent themselves as capable of providing professional mental or behavioral health care.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

HB2371 amends Arizona law to introduce artificial intelligence-assisted arbitration in divorce cases, provided both parties consent and do not have minor children. The bill outlines the process for arbitration, the ability for parties to withdraw consent, and the appeal process for binding determinations made through this method. It defines artificial intelligence-assisted arbitration and establishes the jurisdiction of courts over these matters.

Key Sections

• Appeal Process for Binding Determinations: A binding determination from AI-assisted arbitration can be appealed in superior court within twenty judicial days, with the court reviewing the case de novo.
• Appeal Process for Binding Determinations: Binding determinations made through artificial intelligence-assisted arbitration can be appealed to the superior court within twenty judicial days, with the court reviewing the case de novo without considering prior arbitration proceedings.
• Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Arbitration in Divorce Proceedings: This provision allows parties in a divorce case to use artificial intelligence for arbitration, provided both parties consent and do not have minor children together.
• Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Arbitration in Divorce Proceedings: This provision allows parties in a divorce without minor children to use artificial intelligence-assisted arbitration if both provide written consent, detailing whether the outcome will be a recommendation or binding determination.
• Definition of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Arbitration: Defines artificial intelligence-assisted arbitration as a computational system that applies laws to facts and generates recommendations or binding determinations, clarifying that it is not a legal person with independent authority.
• Definition of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Arbitration: Defines artificial intelligence-assisted arbitration as a computational system that applies laws to facts and generates recommendations or determinations without being a legal entity.
• Entry of Binding Determinations: Any court with jurisdiction may enter a binding determination resulting from AI-assisted arbitration.
• Jurisdiction for Binding Determinations: Any court with jurisdiction over the divorce matter may enter a binding determination from the artificial intelligence-assisted arbitration.
• Withdrawal of Consent: Parties may withdraw their consent to AI-assisted arbitration at any time before a recommendation or determination is issued.
• Withdrawal of Consent: Parties may withdraw their consent to the arbitration process at any time before a recommendation or binding determination is issued.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

HB 2409 establishes the Arizona Artificial Intelligence Education Program within the Department of Education. The program will offer summer courses that cover digital hygiene and civic integrity, as well as AI applications for small business and entrepreneurship. The curriculum will include training on navigating the digital world safely, understanding algorithmic bias, and using AI tools for business operations. The program aims to empower residents with skills for economic success and to recognize digital manipulation.

Key Sections

• Academic Credit: This provision allows public schools, universities, and community colleges to award academic credit for completing the AI education course.
• Academic Credit for Course Completion: This provision allows educational institutions to award academic credit to participants completing the AI education course.
• Arizona Artificial Intelligence Education Program: This provision establishes the Arizona Artificial Intelligence Education Program and outlines the course offerings, including digital hygiene and AI for small businesses.
• Arizona Artificial Intelligence Education Program: This provision establishes the Arizona Artificial Intelligence Education Program, which will provide summer courses on digital hygiene and AI for small business.
• Curriculum Development: This provision outlines the responsibilities of the Office of Economic Opportunity in developing the curriculum and identifying instructors and facilities for the program.
• Curriculum Development and Instructor Recruitment: This provision assigns the office of economic opportunity to develop the AI curriculum and recruit volunteer instructors from diverse backgrounds.
• Facility Use: This provision allows various state and local entities to provide their facilities for the education program without compensation.
• Facility Use for Education Program: This provision allows state agencies and educational institutions to provide facilities for the education program without compensation.
• Legislative Findings and Intent: This provision includes the legislatures findings regarding the importance of AI education and the intent to empower residents with digital skills.
• Legislative Findings and Intent: This provision outlines the legislatures findings regarding the importance of AI education for economic growth and individual liberty.
• Severability: This provision ensures that if any part of the act is found invalid, the remaining provisions remain effective.
• Severability: This provision ensures that if any part of the act is found invalid, the remaining provisions will still be in effect.
• Short Title: This provision establishes the official title of the act as the Getting Arizona Ready for AI Act.
• Short Title: This provision provides a short title for the act, naming it the Getting Arizona Ready for AI Act.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

HB2410 introduces a new chapter to Title 18 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, specifically addressing the legal status of communications with artificial intelligence. It asserts that communications with AI will be considered privileged if the individual would have been entitled to privileged communication had they consulted a human professional, thereby extending legal protections to interactions with AI technologies.

Key Sections

• Private communication with artificial intelligence; privileged: This provision defines that a persons communication with an artificial intelligence is privileged, akin to the privileges granted to communications made with human professionals.
• Private communication with artificial intelligence; privileged: This provision states that communications between a person and an artificial intelligence are considered privileged if the individual would have received similar privilege had they sought advice from a human professional.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

HB 2490 introduces regulations concerning algorithmic pricing in the rental market. It defines key terms related to algorithmic devices and establishes prohibitions against their use in ways that could facilitate collusion among landlords or manipulate rental prices and terms. The bill outlines enforcement mechanisms and specifies the conditions under which these regulations apply, as well as exceptions for certain types of housing.

Key Sections

• Algorithmic device use prohibited: This provision prohibits landlords and coordinators from using algorithmic devices that utilize nonpublic competitor data to coordinate rental pricing and terms, creating a rebuttable presumption of illegal trade practices if violated.
• Algorithmic device use prohibited: This section prohibits landlords and coordinators from using algorithmic devices that utilize nonpublic competitor data to coordinate pricing or terms for residential rental properties.
• Definitions: This section provides definitions for key terms used in the article, including algorithm, algorithmic device, coordinating function, and others related to rental properties.
• Definitions: This section provides definitions for terms used in the article, including algorithm, algorithmic device, and nonpublic competitor data.
• Enforcement and Applicability: This section outlines the enforcement of the regulations by the attorney general and specifies which landlords and coordinators are subject to the law, as well as exceptions to the regulations.
• Exemptions: This section outlines exemptions from the regulations, including properties with fewer than five rental units and certain government-sponsored housing programs.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

HB2592 introduces regulations for the use of artificial intelligence systems by state budget units. It mandates the identification of opportunities for AI implementation, elimination of restrictive regulations, and the establishment of governance structures. The bill also requires legislative ratification for any rules specifically regulating AI, ensuring that such regulations do not hinder innovation or competition.

Key Sections

• Definitions: Provides definitions for key terms used in the bill related to artificial intelligence systems and computational resources.
• Definitions: This provision provides definitions for key terms used within the section, including artificial intelligence system, computational resource, and content.
• Emergency Rules Approval: This provision mandates that any emergency or temporary rules regulating AI must be approved by the legislature, ensuring that such rules are subject to legislative scrutiny.
• Implementation Guidelines for AI Systems: This provision specifies the operational guidelines for budget units when implementing AI systems, focusing on cost reduction and service improvement without creating new regulatory burdens.
• Implementation Requirements for Budget Units: This provision specifies how budget units should implement AI systems, focusing on cost reduction and service improvement without creating new regulations for the private sector.
• Legislative Ratification of AI Regulations: This provision sets forth the requirements for adopting any rules that specifically regulate AI systems or computational resources, ensuring legislative oversight and minimizing regulatory barriers.
• Legislative Ratification of Rules: Requires legislative approval for emergency or temporary rules regulating AI systems, ensuring oversight and accountability.
• Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Systems: This provision outlines the responsibilities of budget units in implementing artificial intelligence solutions and sets criteria for regulating AI systems.
• Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Systems: This provision outlines the responsibilities of budget units in the state concerning the implementation and regulation of artificial intelligence systems. It emphasizes the need to reduce administrative burdens, eliminate unnecessary regulations, and streamline processes for adopting AI solutions.
• Rule Adoption Conditions: Outlines the conditions under which budget units may adopt rules regulating AI systems.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

SB 1088 proposes an appropriation of $2,500,000 from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2026-2027 to support cybersecurity programs. Specifically, it designates $500,000 for generative artificial intelligence cybersecurity initiatives and $2,000,000 to modernize the statewide VPN security network using a zero trust network access solution.

Key Sections

• Appropriation for Cybersecurity Programs: This provision details the appropriation of funds to the Arizona Department of Homeland Security for various cybersecurity initiatives.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• Assembly - 1542 - Sensitive Personal Information.
• Assembly - 1609 - Customer Service Support.
• Senate - 867 - Toys: Companion Chatbots.
• Senate - 903 - Mental Health Professionals: Artificial Intelligence.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1542 amends sections of the Civil Code regarding the handling of sensitive personal information by businesses. It establishes clearer guidelines for how businesses must inform consumers about the collection and use of their personal information, specifically sensitive data, and reinforces the rights of consumers to limit the use and disclosure of such information.

Key Sections

• Consumers’ Right to Limit Use and Disclosure of Sensitive Personal Information: This section grants consumers the right to direct businesses to limit the use of their sensitive personal information to necessary purposes and prohibits businesses from using or disclosing this information for other purposes without consent.
• General Duties of Businesses that Collect Personal Information: This section outlines the responsibilities of businesses regarding the collection of personal information, emphasizing the need for transparency and consumer consent.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1609 aims to regulate customer service support provided by large private businesses, specifically requiring them to offer human assistance during specified hours, respond quickly to customer requests, and ensure transparency regarding the use of artificial intelligence in customer service interactions.

Key Sections

• Compliance Tracking Mechanisms: Mandates the implementation of tracking mechanisms for compliance with the law.
• Definition of Operator: Clarifies that the term operator does not include small businesses.
• Human Customer Service Requirement: Requires large private businesses to provide human customer service support during business hours.
• Online Customer Service Assistance: Mandates online platforms to allow customers to request human assistance and respond within five minutes.
• Telephonic Customer Service Standards: Sets requirements for telephonic customer service, including quick response and limits on hold time.
• Telephonic Service Availability: Requires businesses to offer a telephonic customer service platform and display contact information prominently.
• Transparency in AI Customer Service: Prohibits misrepresentation of AI systems as human and requires disclosure of artificial interactions.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

Senate Bill No. 867 introduces regulations on toys that include companion chatbots, which are defined as artificial intelligence systems that mimic human-like interactions. The bill prohibits the manufacture, sale, or exchange of such toys until January 1, 2031, aiming to ensure childrens safety and clarity in interactions with these technologies.

Key Sections

• Companion Chat Bots in Toys: This provision prohibits any person from manufacturing, selling, exchanging, or offering for sale any toy that includes a companion chatbot.
• Definition of Toy: Defines a toy as a product designed for play by children 12 years of age or less.
• Expiration of Chapter: States that this chapter will be repealed on January 1, 2031.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

Senate Bill No. 903 establishes regulations for the use of artificial intelligence by licensed mental health professionals in California. It prohibits the use of AI in therapeutic settings without informed consent and restricts AI from making independent therapeutic decisions. The bill aims to safeguard individuals seeking mental health services and ensure that they are provided by qualified professionals.

Key Sections

• Chapter Title: This chapter may be cited as the Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act.
• Confidentiality of Records: All communications and records related to therapy must remain confidential, with specific exceptions as required by law.
• Definitions: Defines key terms used in the chapter, including administrative support, artificial intelligence, licensed professional, and others relevant to the context of therapy and AI use.
• Enforcement and Penalties: The Department of Consumer Affairs is authorized to investigate violations and impose civil penalties for non-compliance with the chapter.
• Exemptions: This chapter does not apply to religious counseling, peer support, or self-help materials that do not offer therapy services.
• Prohibition on Unlicensed Services: Prohibits individuals or entities from offering therapy services unless they are provided by licensed professionals.
• Purpose of the Chapter: The purpose of this chapter is to safeguard individuals seeking therapy or psychotherapy services by ensuring these services are delivered by qualified, licensed, or certified professionals.
• Restrictions on AI Capabilities: Prohibits AI from making independent therapeutic decisions or interacting directly with clients in therapeutic communication.
• Use of Artificial Intelligence: A licensed professional may not use AI in therapy unless the patient is informed and consents to its use.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• House - 1395 - Artificial Intelligence
• House - 1503 - Technology Education
• House - 527 - Mandatory Human Reviews Of Insurance Claim Denials
• House - 899 - Task Force On Artificial Intelligence In Public Postsecondary Education
• Senate - 1194 - Artificial Intelligence In Education
• Senate - 1458 - Artificial Intelligence In Higher Education
• Senate - 146 - Use Of Artificial Intelligence By State Agencies
• Senate - 1694 - Technology Education
• Senate - 344 - Use Of Artificial Intelligence In Psychological, Clinical, Counseling, And Therapy Services
• Senate - 480 - Information Technology
• Senate - 482 - Artificial Intelligence Bill Of Rights
• Senate - 7030 - Public Records/Investigations By The Department Of Legal Affairs

Summary

This bill introduces the Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights in Florida, defining artificial intelligence and prohibiting certain contracts with foreign entities of concern. It lays out various rights for Floridians related to AI, including rights to privacy, consent, and protection from misuse of AI technologies. The bill also mandates that AI technologies must not infringe on personal rights and establishes penalties for violations.

Key Sections

• Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights: Establishes a set of rights for Floridians regarding the use of artificial intelligence.
• Definition of Artificial Intelligence: Defines artificial intelligence as engineered systems capable of inferring outputs from inputs to influence environments.
• Definitions for AI Regulations: Provides definitions for terms used in the context of AI rights and regulations.
• Prohibition on Contracts with Certain Entities: Prohibits governmental entities from extending or renewing contracts with certain foreign entities that have access to personal identifying information.
• Rights Related to AI Usage: Lists specific rights of individuals regarding AI, including protection from misuse and the right to civil remedies.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill amends existing Florida Statutes to require school districts to develop and provide elective courses in computer technology for high school students. It also revises the general education core course standards for public postsecondary educational institutions to include technology-related courses, ensuring that students are equipped with relevant technological skills.

Key Sections

• General Education Core Course Standards: This provision updates the standards for general education core courses in public postsecondary institutions to include technology courses that provide an understanding of computer science, software engineering, and related fields.
• High School Electives Requirements: This provision requires school districts to offer coordinated electives in high schools, specifically including courses in computer technology like artificial intelligence, and allows students to earn college credit through these courses.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill establishes mandatory human reviews for insurance claim denials across various sectors, including workers compensation, general insurance, and health maintenance organizations. It defines key terms and outlines the responsibilities of qualified human professionals in the claims process. The bill mandates that any decision to deny or reduce a claim must be made by a qualified human professional after a thorough review of the case, independent of automated systems. It also requires carriers to maintain records of these decisions and includes provisions for enforcement and penalties for non-compliance.

Key Sections

• Claims-Handling Manual: Health maintenance organizations must detail in their claims-handling manuals how algorithms and AI systems are utilized in compliance with this section.
• Claims-Handling Manual Requirements: Insurers using automated systems must detail their usage in their claims-handling manuals and how they comply with the bill.
• Definitions: This section defines key terms used in the bill, including algorithm, artificial intelligence system, machine learning system, and qualified human professional.
• Definitions: This section defines key terms used throughout the bill, including algorithm, artificial intelligence system, machine learning system, and qualified human professional.
• Denial Communication Requirements: All written communications regarding claim denials must include contact information for the qualified professional and a statement affirming that an automated system did not solely determine the outcome.
• Denial Communications: Insurers must clearly identify the qualified human professional responsible for the claim denial in communications to claimants and affirm that automated systems were not the sole basis for the decision.
• Duties of Qualified Human Professionals: Qualified human professionals are required to analyze claims independently of automated systems, review the accuracy of outputs from such systems, and conduct reviews of prior decisions made by other professionals.
• Effective Date: The act will take effect on July 1, 2026.
• Human Decision Requirement: Insurers must ensure that any decision to deny a claim or any part of it is made by a qualified human professional.
• Human Oversight Requirements: Before denying a claim based on AI or algorithmic recommendations, qualified professionals must independently analyze the claim, review AI outputs, and confirm the denial is justified under the contract terms.
• Mandatory human reviews of claim denials in General Insurance: This provision establishes similar requirements for general insurers regarding the use of algorithms and AI in processing claims.
• Mandatory human reviews of claim denials in Health Maintenance Organizations: This provision applies the same standards to health maintenance organizations as to other insurers concerning claim processing.
• Mandatory human reviews of claim denials in Workers Compensation: This provision outlines the requirements for workers compensation carriers to utilize algorithms and AI systems while ensuring that claim denials or reductions are made by qualified human professionals.
• Market Conduct Examinations: The office may conduct examinations and investigations to ensure compliance with the regulations set forth in this section.
• Market Conduct Examinations: The Office of Insurance Regulation is authorized to conduct market conduct examinations to ensure compliance with this section.
• Prohibition on Sole Use of Automated Systems: The bill prohibits the use of algorithms, AI systems, or machine learning systems as the sole basis for claim denial decisions.
• Record Keeping: Health maintenance organizations must maintain detailed records of decisions made by qualified professionals regarding claim denials or reductions, including the professionals details and the rationale for their decisions.
• Record Keeping: Insurers must maintain detailed records of the actions taken by qualified human professionals in the claim denial process.
• Rule Adoption: The commission is authorized to adopt rules necessary for the implementation of this section.
• Rule Adoption: The Financial Services Commission is authorized to adopt rules necessary to implement this section.
• Use of Technology in Claims Processing: Health maintenance organizations are permitted to use algorithms and AI systems to assist in claims processing, but decisions to deny claims must be made by qualified human professionals.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill creates a Task Force on Artificial Intelligence in Public Postsecondary Education under the Department of Education. The task force is required to convene by August 1, 2026, and will consist of various stakeholders, including faculty, education board representatives, and AI experts. The task forces duties include examining the impact of AI on academic integrity, exploring AI applications in education, and recommending policies for its ethical use. A report of findings and recommendations is to be submitted by December 1, 2026, after which the task force will terminate.

Key Sections

• Creation and Purpose of the Task Force: The bill establishes the Task Force on Artificial Intelligence in Public Postsecondary Education to assess AIs role in academic instruction, research, and student conduct within Floridas higher education systems.
• Duties of the Task Force: The task force is tasked with examining various aspects of AIs impact on education, including academic integrity, potential applications, privacy implications, and the development of model policies for AI use in education.
• Membership of the Task Force: The task force will comprise faculty members from state universities and colleges, education board representatives, an AI expert appointed by the Governor, a representative from the Southern Regional Education Board, and a student representative from the Florida student association.
• Reporting and Termination: The task force is required to compile its findings and recommendations into a report to be submitted to state leadership by December 1, 2026, after which the task force will be dissolved.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill mandates the State Board of Education to create statewide policies regarding the use of artificial intelligence in schools. It requires that students receive instruction on digital literacy and AI ethics, and it outlines the responsibilities of the Department of Education in monitoring compliance and providing teacher training. Additionally, it amends existing statutes to incorporate AI-related policies into student codes of conduct.

Key Sections

• Artificial Intelligence Policies: Establishes policies for the use of AI in schools, requiring teacher permission for student use, disclosure of AI usage in work, and safeguards for assessments in virtual schools.
• Code of Student Conduct: Requires that student codes of conduct include policies on the use of artificial intelligence.
• Instruction on Digital Literacy and AI Ethics: Mandates age-appropriate instruction on digital literacy and the ethical use of AI for students in grades 6 through 12.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill creates the Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education Study Group, tasked with reviewing the impact of artificial intelligence on academic integrity, teaching, and research within Floridas higher education systems. The group will consist of various stakeholders, including faculty, students, and AI experts, and is required to submit a report with findings and recommendations by December 1, 2026.

Key Sections

• Creation of the Study Group: Establishes the Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education Study Group to evaluate the effects of AI in academic settings.
• Duties of the Study Group: Outlines the responsibilities of the study group, including examining AIs impact on academic integrity and reviewing potential applications in education.
• Expiration of the Section: States that the provisions of this section will expire at the end of the year 2026.
• Membership of the Study Group: Details the composition of the study group, including faculty, education board representatives, AI experts, and a student representative.
• Report Submission: Requires the study group to submit a report to the Governor and legislative leaders by a specified date.
• Stakeholder Input: Mandates the study group to gather input from various stakeholders, including faculty and industry experts.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This legislation mandates the Florida Digital Service to conduct a comprehensive study on the use of artificial intelligence by state agencies. It defines artificial intelligence and state agencies, and outlines the requirements for the study, including details on the agencies using AI, the purposes of their use, and associated costs. A report summarizing the findings must be submitted by March 1, 2027.

Key Sections

• Definitions: This section defines key terms used in the bill, particularly artificial intelligence and state agency.
• Report Submission: The Florida Digital Service must submit a written report of the studys findings to specified government officials by March 1, 2027.
• Study Requirements: The Florida Digital Service is required to conduct a study on the impact of AI technology used by state agencies, including a list of agencies, their purposes for using AI, and the costs involved.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill amends section 1007.25 of the Florida Statutes to incorporate technology courses into the general education core course standards for public postsecondary educational institutions. It mandates that faculty committees review and recommend course options that include subjects related to computer science, artificial intelligence, robotics, and cybersecurity, ensuring students gain relevant technological skills.

Key Sections

• General Education Core Course Standards: This provision outlines the standards for general education core courses, specifically including technology courses that focus on computer science and related fields.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill establishes regulations regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the fields of psychology, clinical social work, marriage and family therapy, and mental health counseling. It defines AI and prohibits its use in direct therapeutic practices, with specified exceptions for administrative support and session recording under certain conditions. The bill seeks to protect the integrity of mental health services by limiting AIs role in direct client interactions.

Key Sections

• Use of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Social Work and Counseling: This provision mirrors the regulations for psychology, defining AI and prohibiting its use in clinical social work and mental health counseling, with similar exceptions.
• Use of Artificial Intelligence in Psychology: This provision defines artificial intelligence and prohibits its use in the practice of psychology, with exceptions for administrative support and session recording under informed consent.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill creates the Division of Integrated Government Innovation and Technology (DIGIT) within the Executive Office of the Governor, transferring responsibilities from the Department of Management Services. It establishes DIGIT as a separate budget entity responsible for overseeing state information technology governance, cybersecurity standards, and supporting state agencies in technology initiatives. The bill also outlines various requirements for compliance, reporting, and collaboration among state agencies and establishes new roles and responsibilities for key positions related to information technology management.

Key Sections

• Creation of DIGIT: The bill establishes the Division of Integrated Government Innovation and Technology (DIGIT) as a new entity within the Executive Office of the Governor to manage information technology functions previously handled by the Department of Management Services.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

The bill amends existing statutes and creates new sections to define artificial intelligence, prohibit certain contracts with foreign entities, and establish the Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights for Floridians. It outlines the rights of individuals regarding AI, including consent requirements for minors, protections against misuse of personal data, and civil remedies for violations. The bill also imposes obligations on AI technology companies and chatbot platforms to protect user information and restrict access for minors without parental consent.

Key Sections

• Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights: Establishes the Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights which outlines the rights of Floridians regarding the use of AI.
• Commercial Use of Likeness: Prohibits the commercial use of an individuals likeness created through AI without consent and establishes penalties.
• Companion Chatbot Regulations: Imposes regulations on companion chatbot platforms, including parental consent for minors and options for parents to monitor interactions.
• Data Protection and Violations: Prohibits AI companies from selling or disclosing personal information without consent and establishes penalties for violations.
• Definitions and Contracting Restrictions: This provision defines artificial intelligence and prohibits governmental entities from contracting with certain foreign entities that could access personal identifying information.
• Legal Actions and Enforcement: Authorizes the Department of Legal Affairs to take action against violations of the AI regulations and provides for civil penalties.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill amends various sections of Florida Statutes to provide exemptions from public records requirements for information held by the Department of Legal Affairs regarding notifications and investigations of violations related to companion chatbots, bots, and deidentified data. It outlines the conditions under which this information remains confidential and the circumstances under which it may be disclosed.

Key Sections

• Companion chatbot use for minors: This provision establishes that information related to notifications or investigations of violations concerning companion chatbots is confidential and exempt from public records until the investigation is completed or ceases to be active.
• Companion Chatbot Use for Minors: This provision exempts information related to notifications and investigations of violations concerning companion chatbots from public records until investigations are concluded.
• Conditions for Disclosure During Investigation: This provision specifies the conditions under which the Department may disclose confidential information during an active investigation, including for official duties, public notifications, and cooperation with other governmental entities.
• Confidentiality of Investigation Information: This provision establishes that all information related to notifications or investigations of violations of section 501.9986 is confidential and exempt from public disclosure until the investigation is completed or inactive.
• Consumer protections regarding bots: This provision outlines that information related to notifications or investigations of violations concerning bots is confidential and exempt from public records until the investigation is completed or ceases to be active.
• Consumer Protections Regarding Bots: This provision provides a similar exemption for notifications and investigations related to bot-related consumer protection violations.
• Consumer protections regarding deidentified data: This provision states that information related to notifications or investigations of violations concerning deidentified data is confidential and exempt from public records until the investigation is completed or ceases to be active.
• Consumer Protections Regarding Deidentified Data: This provision ensures that information related to deidentified data violations remains confidential and exempt from public records.
• Definition of Proprietary Information: This provision defines proprietary information in the context of artificial intelligence technology companies and outlines the criteria for what constitutes such information.
• Post-Investigation Confidentiality: This provision outlines the types of information that remain confidential even after an investigation is completed, including personal identifying information and proprietary data.
• Public Necessity for Confidentiality: This provision explains the public necessity for keeping investigation-related information confidential, citing potential harms from premature disclosure.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• House - 147 - Georgia Technology Authority; Annual Inventory Of Artificial Intelligence Usage By State Agencies; Provide
• House - 171 - Crimes And Offenses; Obscenity; Repeal And Replace Code Section 16-12-80
• House - 638 - Marta; Prohibit Stopping Or Parking Of A Motor Vehicle Other Than A Transit Vehicle In A Designated Transit Vehicle Lane In The City Of Atlanta
• Senate - 398 - Wiretapping, Eavesdropping, Surveillance, And Related Offenses; Criminal Offenses Of Virtual Peeping; Establish

Summary

This bill amends the Georgia Technology Authoritys regulations to require an annual inventory of artificial intelligence systems utilized by state agencies. It mandates the development of policies regarding the procurement and implementation of these systems, with a focus on preventing unlawful discrimination. The bill also requires the authority to prepare annual reports on the usage of artificial intelligence across agencies and ensures cooperation among state entities in this process.

Key Sections

• Annual Inventory of AI Systems: State agencies must conduct an annual inventory of artificial intelligence systems they use and publish this information on a public website.
• Annual Inventory of AI Systems: This provision requires the Georgia Technology Authority to conduct an annual inventory of artificial intelligence systems used by state agencies, starting by December 31, 2025.
• Annual Report on AI Usage: This provision requires the Georgia Technology Authority to prepare an annual report on the inventory of AI systems used by state agencies.
• Cooperation of State Agencies: This provision mandates that all state agencies cooperate with the Georgia Technology Authority in the administration of the inventory and reporting process.
• Development of Policies and Procedures: This provision mandates the Georgia Technology Authority to develop policies and procedures regarding the use of artificial intelligence systems by December 31, 2026.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill amends existing laws in Georgia regarding obscenity and related offenses by specifically prohibiting the distribution of computer-generated obscene material that depicts children. It establishes definitions for obscenity and child, outlines penalties for violations, and mandates reporting for individuals who suspect they are processing such material. Additionally, it introduces enhanced sentencing for defendants who utilize artificial intelligence in the commission of designated offenses.

Key Sections

• Amendments to Existing Codes: This section amends references in the Official Code of Georgia to replace outdated code sections with the newly established code regarding obscene material and AI.
• Amendments to Other Titles: This section amends references in Titles 20 and 32 of the Official Code of Georgia to reflect changes in the obscenity law.
• Amendments to Related Codes: This section amends existing laws to replace references to previous code sections with updated ones regarding the distribution of obscene materials.
• Definitions and Offenses: Establishes definitions for terms related to the distribution of obscene material and outlines offenses related to the distribution of computer-generated obscene material depicting a child.
• Effective Date: Specifies the effective date of the bill as July 1, 2025, and its applicability to offenses committed on or after this date.
• Effective Date: This section specifies the effective date of the Act as July 1, 2025, and its applicability to offenses committed after this date.
• Enhanced Sentencing for AI Usage: This section establishes enhanced penalties for defendants who utilize artificial intelligence in committing certain offenses, specifying the consequences based on whether the offense is a misdemeanor or felony.
• Exemptions for Law Enforcement: Clarifies that the provisions do not apply to law enforcement activities related to the investigation and prosecution of crimes.
• Penalties for Offenses: Details the penalties associated with the distribution of computer-generated obscene material depicting a child, including felony and misdemeanor classifications.
• Prohibition of Computer Generated Obscene Material: This section prohibits the distribution of computer-generated obscene material depicting a child, defining the criteria that constitute obscenity and detailing the penalties for violations.
• Prohibition of Distribution of Obscene Material: This provision prohibits the distribution of computer-generated obscene material depicting a child and establishes criteria for what constitutes obscene material.
• Prohibition of Distribution of Obscene Material: This section establishes the offense of distributing computer-generated obscene material depicting a child, defining the criteria for obscenity and the penalties for offenders.
• Repeal of Conflicting Laws: States that all conflicting laws will be repealed to ensure the new provisions take precedence.
• Repeal of Conflicting Laws: This section repeals any laws that conflict with the provisions of this Act.
• Reporting Obligations: Mandates reporting requirements for individuals who suspect they are processing obscene material depicting minors, providing immunity for those who report in good faith.
• Revised Obscenity Laws: This provision repeals the previous Code Section 16-12-80 and replaces it with a new definition and penalties for the distribution of computer-generated obscene material depicting a child.
• Sentencing Enhancements for AI Utilization: This provision outlines the penalties for defendants who utilize artificial intelligence in committing designated offenses, including enhanced sentences for such actions.
• Sentencing Enhancements for AI Utilization: This section outlines the enhanced sentencing for defendants who utilize artificial intelligence in committing designated offenses, specifying the penalties based on the severity of the offense.
• Sentencing for Use of Artificial Intelligence: This provision introduces enhanced sentencing guidelines for defendants who use artificial intelligence in the commission of certain designated offenses.
• Short Title: This section provides the official title of the Act as the Ensuring Accountability for Illegal AI Activities Act.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House Bill 638 proposes amendments to the Georgia Code regarding the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA). It prohibits non-transit vehicles from stopping or parking in designated transit vehicle lanes in Atlanta, introduces penalties for violations, and authorizes the use of automated monitoring devices for enforcement. The bill outlines procedures for issuing citations, conditions for penalties, and the management of funds collected from fines.

Key Sections

• Automated Monitoring and Citations: Allows for the use of automated transit vehicle lane monitoring devices to issue civil monetary penalties for violations, detailing the process for notifying vehicle owners.
• Automated Monitoring and Civil Penalties: Allows for the use of automated devices to monitor transit lane violations and issue civil penalties, detailing the process for notification and contesting violations.
• Definition of Terms: This provision defines key terms used within the bill, including agent, automated transit vehicle lane monitoring device, motor vehicle, and others relevant to the enforcement of the law.
• Definitions: This section defines key terms related to the enforcement of transit vehicle lane regulations, including agent, automated transit vehicle lane monitoring device, and transit vehicle.
• Enforcement and Prosecution: Details the enforcement mechanisms and the authority of law enforcement to prosecute violations associated with transit lane regulations.
• Evidence of Violation: Details the evidentiary standards for proving a violation, including the use of recorded images and the conditions under which the owner can contest liability.
• Funding and Agreements: Specifies that funds collected from penalties will support public safety initiatives and outlines the requirements for contracts with agents administering the monitoring devices.
• Implementation and Regulations: Empowers the department to create rules for the implementation of transit lane regulations, particularly for lanes on state highways.
• Initial Warning Period: Establishes a six-month warning period after a transit lane is designated, during which violations will only receive warnings instead of penalties.
• Penalties for Violations: Establishes a penalty structure for violations, including fines for first, second, and third offenses, along with options for completing a safety course to waive fines.
• Penalties for Violations: Establishes penalties for violations of transit lane regulations, including fines and requirements for completing safety courses for repeat offenders.
• Prohibition of Stopping or Parking: It is prohibited for any vehicle other than a transit vehicle to stop or park in a designated transit lane unless authorized by traffic control devices or during emergencies.
• Prohibition of Stopping/Parking: This provision prohibits stopping or parking of non-transit vehicles in transit vehicle lanes, except when authorized by traffic control devices or during emergencies.
• Signage Requirements: Mandates the placement of warning signs regarding automated monitoring devices prior to transit vehicle lanes to inform drivers of enforcement.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

Senate Bill 398 amends Georgias laws on wiretapping and surveillance by introducing provisions against virtual peeping, which involves the unauthorized generation of images of individuals using generative AI. The bill outlines specific definitions, penalties for violations, and exceptions for law enforcement activities. The legislation aims to protect the privacy of individuals, particularly minors, from unauthorized image generation.

Key Sections

• Definitions: This section defines key terms related to the bill, including adult, generative artificial intelligence system, image, individual, minor, nudity, obscene material, and photograph.
• Law Enforcement Exception: The provisions do not apply to law enforcement activities related to the investigation and prosecution of crimes.
• Minor Image Generation: Generating an image of a minor without consent is a felony, punishable by 1 to 5 years in prison. If the minor is 14 or older and consented, it may be a misdemeanor under certain conditions.
• Obscene Material Generation: It is a felony to generate obscene material that includes an image of an adult without consent. Penalties include imprisonment from 1 to 10 years and a fine up to $50,000.
• Obscene Material Involving Minors: Creating obscene material that includes an image of a minor is a serious felony, punishable by 5 to 20 years in prison and a fine up to $100,000.
• Offense of Virtual Peeping: The bill establishes the offense of virtual peeping, which occurs when a person uses a generative AI system to create an image of an adult without their consent. This is classified as a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.
• Separate Offenses: Each generated image related to a violation of the provisions constitutes a separate offense, increasing the potential for penalties.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• Senate - 1227 - Artificial Intelligence, Education

Summary

This bill amends Title 33 of the Idaho Code by adding a new chapter that addresses the integration of generative AI technologies in education. It mandates the development of a statewide framework by the State Department of Education, which will guide local school districts and public charter schools in adopting policies regarding the use of generative AI. The bill emphasizes the importance of transparency, student privacy, and human oversight in educational settings while promoting the ethical use of AI tools for instruction and administration.

Key Sections

• Definitions: This section provides definitions for generative artificial intelligence and its application in education, focusing on its responsible use to enhance learning and administrative efficiency.
• Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education Framework: The State Department of Education is required to develop a statewide framework for integrating generative AI in K-12 schools, focusing on oversight, transparency, and data security.
• Legislative Intent: This section outlines the legislative intent to safeguard student privacy, promote human-centered learning, and prepare students for an economy influenced by generative AI technologies.
• Parental and Community Engagement: The State Department of Education will provide a guidance document for parents and guardians to promote understanding of generative AI in education.
• Policy Adoption: Local school districts and public charter schools must adopt policies governing the use of generative AI, aligning with the statewide framework and defining appropriate uses.
• Procurement and Technology Requirements: Local school districts must ensure that generative AI-related tools comply with data privacy laws and disclose their use of AI technologies.
• Rulemaking Authority: The State Board of Education is granted authority to create rules for implementing the provisions of this chapter.
• Standards, Assessments, and Professional Development: The State Department of Education will develop generative AI literacy standards, assessment guidelines, and a professional development plan for educators.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• Senate - 2255 - Surveillance Discrimination

Summary

This Act prohibits surveillance-based discrimination in pricing and wages by prohibiting the use of surveillance data in automated decision systems that determine individualized prices for consumers or wages for employees. It defines key terms, sets out exemptions, establishes enforcement by the Attorney General, and provides for penalties and private rights of action. It also outlines relationship to other laws and provides for rulemaking.

Key Sections

• Definitions: Defines terms used throughout the Act, including automated decision system, behaviors, biometric information, consumer, employee, genetic information, individualized, insurer, personal characteristics, price, surveillance data, wage, and related concepts.
• Definitions: This section provides definitions for key terms used in the Act, including automated decision system, surveillance data, consumer, employee, and others relevant to the context of the law.
• Enforcement: Authorizes the Attorney General to enforce the Act and imposes civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation, with attorneys’ fees and per-transaction/consumer leverage.
• Enforcement: This section empowers the Attorney General to enforce the provisions of the Act and establishes penalties for violations, including civil penalties and attorney fees.
• Enforcement: This section outlines the enforcement mechanisms for the Act, specifying that the Attorney General will enforce the provisions and detailing the penalties for violations.
• Private right of action: Allows individuals aggrieved by a violation to bring civil actions to restrain further violations and recover damages, with options for actual damages, statutory damages, or treble damages for bad faith or intentional violations, and permits collectives of similarly situated persons.
• Private right of action: This provision grants individuals the right to bring civil action for violations of the Act, allowing for the recovery of damages and attorneys fees.
• Private right of action: This section allows individuals harmed by violations of the Act to file civil actions for damages, including actual damages or statutory amounts, and outlines the conditions for such actions.
• Prohibit surveillance-based price discrimination: Prohibits using surveillance data within automated decision systems to set individualized prices for goods or services, with narrow price-based exceptions for cost-based variation. Contains listed exemptions for insurers using risk-relevant data and for transactions based on consumer reports under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
• Prohibit surveillance-based price discrimination: This provision prohibits the use of surveillance data in automated systems that set individualized prices for consumers, with certain exceptions for insurers and credit decisions based on consumer reports.
• Prohibit surveillance-based price discrimination: This section prohibits the use of surveillance data in automated decision systems to determine individualized pricing for consumers, with exceptions for certain insurance practices and credit decisions based on consumer reports.
• Prohibit surveillance-based wage discrimination: Prohibits using surveillance data within automated decision systems to inform the individualized wages paid to employees. Allows certain narrowly defined scenarios where wage decisions may be based on directly task-related data or cost considerations, requires disclosure of data considered, and requires procedures to ensure data accuracy.
• Prohibit surveillance-based wage discrimination: This provision prohibits the use of surveillance data in automated systems that determine individualized wages for employees, while allowing for individualized wages based on specific job-related data and cost differences.
• Prohibit surveillance-based wage discrimination: This section prohibits the use of surveillance data in automated decision systems to set individualized wages for employees, with allowances for specific circumstances where individual data is used or prior disclosures are made.
• Relationship with other laws: States that the Act does not preempt or modify other legal rights or defenses; preserves other remedies available at law or in equity.
• Relationship with other laws: This section clarifies that the Act does not preempt or alter other legal rights, claims, or remedies available under law.
• Relationship with other laws: This section clarifies that the Act does not preempt other rights or remedies available under law.
• Rulemaking: Permits the Attorney General to adopt rules as necessary to implement and enforce the Act.
• Rulemaking: This provision allows the Attorney General to adopt rules necessary for the implementation and enforcement of the Act.
• Rulemaking: This section grants the Attorney General the authority to adopt necessary rules for implementing and enforcing the Act.
• Short title: Cites the act as the Surveillance-Based Price and Wage Discrimination Act.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• House - 1085 - Civil Liability For Child Sexual Abuse Material.
• House - 1201 - Various Mental Health And Insurance Matters.
• House - 1360 - Access To Public Records.
• House - 1421 - Ban On Employer Use Of Automated Decision Systems.
• Senate - 199 - Various Education Matters.

Summary

House Bill No. 1085 introduces provisions for civil liability concerning child sexual abuse material and obscene material on the Internet. It enables individuals depicted in or exposed to such materials to file civil actions against those who knowingly allow access to, disseminate, or provide the content. The bill also allows the attorney general to seek injunctive relief and establishes a safe harbor provision for certain entities under specific conditions. Notably, it states that comparative fault and tort claims immunities do not apply to these civil actions.

Key Sections

• Attorney Generals Authority: This section grants the attorney general the authority to seek injunctive relief against individuals or entities that violate the provisions related to prohibited material.
• Civil Action for Prohibited Material: This provision allows individuals depicted in prohibited material to file a civil action against those who knowingly facilitate access to or disseminate such material.
• Civil Action for Prohibited Material: This provision allows individuals depicted in prohibited material to file a civil lawsuit against those who knowingly or intentionally allow access to, disseminate, or provide such material online. It also permits parents or guardians to sue on behalf of minors depicted in such materials.
• Definitions: Defines key terms such as child sexual abuse material, information content provider, interactive computer service provider, obscene material, and prohibited material.
• Immunities and Administrative Remedies: This provision clarifies that certain immunities do not apply to actions brought under the chapter, and allows claims without exhausting administrative remedies.
• Immunities and Administrative Remedies: This provision clarifies that certain immunities related to tort claims do not apply to actions brought under the new chapter concerning child sexual abuse material, and it allows such actions to proceed without exhausting administrative remedies.
• Injunctive Relief: The attorney general is authorized to seek injunctive relief against individuals violating the provisions related to prohibited material.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House Bill No. 1201 addresses various mental health and insurance matters by prohibiting the use of artificial intelligence to impersonate licensed mental health professionals, requiring compliance with network adequacy standards for health carriers, and ensuring favorable reimbursement rates for mental health services relative to Medicare. It also sets forth regulations on downcoding practices and retroactive audits of paid claims.

Key Sections

• Amendments to Health Provider Contracts: This provision sets notice requirements for amendments to health provider contracts, requiring 60 days notice before any significant changes.
• Annual Reporting Requirements for Mental Health Services: Contracts providing mental health services must report on medical necessity criteria and reimbursement rates relative to Medicare for mental health versus other medical services annually.
• Audit and Overpayment Recovery Limits for HMOs: HMOs are restricted from recovering overpayments or auditing claims beyond specified time limits, similar to insurers.
• Downcoding of Health Benefits Claims: This provision prohibits insurers from downcoding health benefits claims in a manner that prevents providers from receiving fair reimbursement.
• Downcoding of Health Benefits Claims: This provision prohibits insurers from downcoding health benefits claims in a manner that reduces reimbursement amounts below what is contractually required.
• Downcoding of Health Benefits Claims: This section defines downcoding and prohibits insurers from using it in a way that prevents providers from receiving proper reimbursement.
• Downcoding of Health Benefits Claims: This section defines downcoding and prohibits insurers from using it in ways that prevent providers from receiving appropriate reimbursement.
• Health Provider Contract Amendments: This provision mandates that health providers receive written notice of contract amendments at least 60 days prior to their effective date.
• Health Provider Contract Amendments: This provision sets notice requirements for amendments to health provider contracts, requiring written notice to providers.
• Health Provider Contract Amendments: This section outlines the notice requirements for amendments to health provider contracts, increasing the notice period from 45 to 60 days.
• Limitations on Retroactive Audits: This provision limits the timeframe in which insurers can retroactively audit paid claims or seek recoupment.
• Limitations on Retroactive Claims Audits: This provision restricts insurers from retroactively auditing paid claims or seeking refunds after a specified period.
• Limits on Overpayment Recovery: Insurers cannot request repayment for overpayments or adjust claims more than two years after the overpayment was made, and cannot audit claims for recoupment after specified timeframes.
• Mental Health Coverage and Out-of-Network Care: If an insurers network does not meet reasonable wait time standards for mental health services, insured individuals may only be charged their standard deductible or copayment when using out-of-network providers.
• Network Adequacy Standards: This provision requires the department of insurance to ensure health carriers meet network adequacy standards and to contract with a third party for compliance verification.
• Network Adequacy Standards: This provision requires the Department of Insurance to ensure health carriers meet network adequacy standards and to contract with a third party for compliance verification.
• Network Adequacy Standards: This section mandates that the Department of Insurance ensure health carriers comply with network adequacy standards and contract with a third party for verification.
• Network Adequacy Standards: This section requires the Department of Insurance to ensure health carriers meet network adequacy standards and to verify compliance using a third party.
• Parity in Reimbursement Rates: Insurers must ensure that reimbursement rates for mental health services are at least as favorable as those for medical and surgical services relative to Medicare rates.
• Prohibition of Retroactive Rate Reductions: Insurers and HMOs are prohibited from retroactively reducing reimbursement rates for CPT codes without prior notice and provider approval.
• Reimbursement for Mental Health Services: This provision mandates that insurers reimburse mental health providers at rates at least as favorable as those for medical services relative to Medicare rates.
• Reimbursement for Mental Health Services: This section mandates that insurers reimburse mental health and substance abuse service providers at rates comparable to those for medical services relative to Medicare.
• Reimbursement Rates for Mental Health Services: This provision requires insurers to reimburse mental health and substance abuse service providers at rates at least as favorable as those for medical or surgical services relative to Medicare.
• Reimbursement Rates for Mental Health Services: This provision requires insurers to reimburse mental health and substance abuse service providers at rates at least as favorable as those for medical services relative to Medicare rates.
• Retroactive Audits and Claims: This section prevents insurers from retroactively auditing claims or seeking refunds after a specified period.
• Retroactive Claim Auditing: This section prohibits insurers from retroactively auditing paid claims beyond a specified time frame.
• Retroactive Rate Reduction for HMOs: Similar to insurers, HMOs cannot retroactively reduce reimbursement rates without prior notice and consent from providers.
• Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems: This provision prohibits the use of artificial intelligence systems to impersonate or act as a substitute for licensed mental health professionals during required interactions.
• Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems: This provision prohibits the use of artificial intelligence systems to impersonate or act as substitutes for licensed mental health professionals during required interactions.
• Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems: This section defines the term artificial intelligence system and prohibits its use to impersonate or substitute for licensed mental health professionals.
• Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems: This section prohibits the use of artificial intelligence systems to impersonate or act as substitutes for licensed mental health professionals.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

HB 1360 allows public agencies in Indiana to create electronic portals for public records requests. These portals will include security features to verify human requestors and their residency status. The bill also introduces provisions for collecting additional fees from non-residents and prioritizing requests based on their purpose. Public agencies are required to report suspicious requests, and the public access counselor must address excessive requests and recommend solutions to the General Assembly.

Key Sections

• Annual Report by Public Access Counselor: The public access counselor is required to include information on public records requests in their annual report, including details on suspect requests and recommendations for addressing excessive requests.
• Annual Reporting by Public Access Counselor: This provision requires the public access counselor to include information about public records requests in their annual report, specifically regarding excessive and suspect requests.
• Definitions: Defines and clarifies terms used throughout the chapter, including data scraping, direct cost, electronic map, enhanced access, phishin g, public agency, public record, standard-sized documents, trade secret, and work product of an attorney, among others, to ensure consistent interpretation of the public records law.
• Electronic portal for public records requests: Adds Sec. 3.3 establishing that a public agency may create and maintain an electronic portal for submitting public records requests. The portal must incorporate CAPTCHA or an equivalent human verification mechanism, require verification of the requestors physical address, indicate whether the requestor is an Indiana resident, and automatically log/report submissions suspected to be automated or originating from known phishing/data-scraping sources.
• Electronic Portal for Public Records Requests: This provision requires public agencies to establish an electronic portal for submitting public records requests, ensuring that the process is secure and verifiable.
• Electronic Portal Requirements: Public agencies must establish an electronic portal for public records requests that includes verification mechanisms and logs suspicious activity.
• Establishment of Electronic Portal: This provision allows public agencies to create an electronic portal for public records requests that includes security measures to ensure the requestor is human and verifies their address.
• Establishment of Electronic Portal: This provision requires public agencies to create and maintain an electronic portal for submitting public records requests, incorporating various security and verification measures.
• Establishment of Electronic Portals: Public agencies may create electronic portals for public records requests that include security features to verify the identity of requestors and log suspicious activities.
• General Assemblys Role: The General Assembly is empowered to establish procedural safeguards to protect public agency resources from excessive or suspect public records requests.
• General Assemblys Role: The General Assembly may establish procedural safeguards to protect public agency resources.
• Priority for Indiana Residents: Public agencies may prioritize requests from Indiana residents and those for civic, journalistic, academic, or personal use.
• Priority for Indiana Residents: This provision permits public agencies to prioritize fulfilling public records requests from Indiana residents and those for civic, journalistic, academic, or personal use.
• Priority in Request Fulfillment: This provision allows public agencies to prioritize fulfilling records requests from Indiana residents and those made for civic, journalistic, academic, or personal use.
• Procedural Safeguards: The General Assembly may establish procedural safeguards to protect public agency resources from excessive or suspect requests.
• Procedural Safeguards: This provision allows the General Assembly to establish procedural safeguards to maintain the integrity and availability of public agency resources.
• Public Access Counselors Actions: The public access counselor must take actions to identify excessive and suspect public records requests and report on their nature and volume in an annual report.
• Public records fees, copying, and enhanced access: Sets rules for charging fees for inspecting, copying, certifying, and transmitting public records. Establishes uniform copying fees, caps on certain costs, and exceptions for nonstandard documents. Provides for reasonable fees for copying, certification, and electronic transmissions, with cost definitions and caps. Addresses special costs for law enforcement recordings and for school corporations in search time for electronic records. Allows waivers in certain circumstances and specifies when costs must be paid in advance.
• Public safety exemptions and disclosure responses: Authorizes denial or non-disclosure of records that, if disclosed, could impede an ongoing law enforcement investigation or threaten public safety. Exempts agencies from confirming the existence of such records when disclosure would reveal vulnerabilities or endanger sources. Establishes the process for denial, partial disclosure, and appeals, including de novo court review and the burden-shifting framework, and requires agencies to provide a general description of withheld material. Includes provisions for timing and appeal rights.
• Reporting of Suspicious Requests: This provision requires public agencies to report to the public access counselor about public records requests that are suspected to be automated or related to phishing or data scraping.
• Reporting Requirements: Mandates public agencies to report suspected automated requests to the public access counselor.
• Reporting Requirements: Public agencies are required to report to the public access counselor regarding public records requests that are suspected to be automated or related to data scraping or phishing activities.
• Reporting Requirements: Public agencies must report suspected automated requests and data scraping to the public access counselor, who will include findings in an annual report.
• Reporting Requirements for Suspect Requests: Public agencies must report to the public access counselor regarding public records requests that are suspected to be automated, involve data scraping, or phishing activities.
• Section 10 – Public access counselor duties related to training and tracking suspicious requests: Expands counselor duties to train public officials, conduct research, produce educational materials, distribute materials to officials, respond to inquiries, issue advisory opinions, and coordinate with agencies to track and report suspicious requests.
• Section 11 – Public agency reporting mechanism for automated/suspicious requests (section 3-11 addition): Adds new subsection requiring public agencies to report suspected automated or data-scraping/public-access suspicious requests to the public access counselor using a standardized mechanism.
• Section 12 – Counselor reporting requirements: Requires the public access counselor to submit an annual electronic report detailing volumes and patterns of requests, inquiries, complaints, and advisory opinions, including breakdowns by agency type and topics such as public records and meetings.
• Section 13 – Data privacy/interactions with emergency contact data (cross-reference to 9-26-10-2): Amends IC 9-26-10-2 to preserve confidentiality of the emergency contact database with defined access exceptions for deletions, law enforcement, coroners, and subpoenas. It clarifies disclosure rights under subpoenas or grand jury subpoenas.
• Section 6 – Public records denial, response times, and litigation: Specifies when a public agency denial of a public record is deemed to occur (in person, by phone, or for enhanced access requests), outlines timelines for mail/fax/electronic requests (7 days), and allows oral denials for in-person or telephone requests. It also details filing a lawsuit to compel inspection, thresholds for proof, de novo review standards, in-camera examinations, and provisions for attorney fees, costs, and penalties (with conditions about informal inquiries). It also sets up exceptions for law enforcement recordings and expedited hearing requirements.
• Section 7 – Public agency reporting of suspected automated or data-scraping requests: Requires public agencies to report to the public access counselor any public records requests suspected to be automated, data scraping, or phishing activity, using a standardized mechanism.
• Section 8 – General safeguards and legislative authority: Affirms that nothing in the chapter prevents the General Assembly from establishing safeguards to protect resource integrity and availability of public agencies; codifies related definitions and authorities for counselor reporting and coordination.
• Section 9 – New definitions for data scraping and phishing: Adds new sections defining data scraping and phishing for purposes of public access laws, linking them to existing definitions in the chapter.
• Supplemental Fee for Non-Residents: Allows public agencies to charge a supplemental fee for processing requests from non-Indiana residents.
• Supplemental Fees and Prioritization: Agencies can charge additional fees for processing requests from non-Indiana residents and prioritize requests from Indiana residents or those for civic, journalistic, academic, or personal use.
• Supplemental Fees and Prioritization: This provision allows public agencies to charge supplemental fees for processing requests from non-Indiana residents and gives priority to requests from Indiana residents and those for civic, journalistic, academic, or personal use.
• Supplemental Fees for Non-Residents: This provision allows public agencies to charge additional fees for processing records requests from individuals or entities that are not Indiana residents.
• Supplemental Fees for Non-Residents: This provision allows public agencies to charge supplemental fees for processing public records requests from non-Indiana residents or out-of-state entities.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House Bill No. 1421 aims to prohibit employers from relying solely on automated decision systems for employment-related decisions and outlines specific conditions under which such systems can be used. It establishes rights for employees and candidates regarding the use of automated outputs, mandates disclosures, and provides mechanisms for enforcement and civil action against violations. The bill seeks to protect covered individuals from discrimination and retaliation related to automated decision-making processes.

Key Sections

• Anti-Discrimination and Retaliation: Employers are prohibited from discriminating or retaliating against individuals for exercising their rights under this chapter.
• Definitions: This section defines key terms used in the bill, including automated decision system, automated decision system output, candidate, covered individual, department, employer, employment related decision, and passive computing infrastructure.
• Disclosure Requirements: Employers using automated decision systems must disclose specific information to covered individuals about the system and its outputs, including how decisions are made and how individuals can dispute those decisions.
• Enforcement and Civil Action: The department of labor is empowered to investigate violations, and individuals or labor organizations can bring civil actions against employers for violations.
• Opt-Out Rights: Covered individuals must be allowed to opt out of management through automated decision systems and be managed by a human.
• Prohibitions on Automated Decision Systems: Employers are prohibited from relying solely on automated decision systems for employment-related decisions and must meet specific conditions if they use automated outputs.
• Training Requirements: Employers must train individuals operating or using automated decision systems on various aspects including input information, appeals processes, and potential biases.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

SB 199 introduces several amendments to Indianas education laws, including changes to the composition of the case review panel for interscholastic athletics, requirements for schools with low reading proficiency scores, and mandates for the secretary of education to report on civic literacy metrics and employee paid leave recommendations. Additionally, it establishes regulations for social media services concerning adolescent users.

Key Sections

• Account Configuration for Minors: Details how social media services must configure accounts for users identified as adolescents to limit their exposure and interactions on the platform.
• Account Creation and Age Verification: Outlines the requirements for social media services regarding account creation for Indiana residents, focusing on age verification and parental consent for adolescents and children.
• Age Verification Method Restrictions: Sets limitations on how social media services can verify ages without retaining unnecessary identifying information.
• Case Review Panel Composition: The bill amends the composition and operational requirements of the case review panel for interscholastic athletic associations, specifying member qualifications and procedures for case handling.
• Changes to Interscholastic Athletic Association Case Review Panel: Amends the composition and operational procedures of the case review panel established by the interscholastic athletic association, including membership qualifications and meeting requirements.
• Civic Literacy Metrics: Requires the secretary of education to identify key metrics for measuring civic literacy in K-12 and postsecondary education and report findings to the general assembly.
• Civic Literacy Metrics: The bill requires the secretary of education to identify and report on key metrics related to civic literacy and engagement in education by December 1, 2026.
• Definition of Addictive Features: Defines addictive features of social media services, including continuous loading of content, seamless content, personal interactive metrics, autoplay videos, and live streaming.
• Emergency Declaration: Declares an emergency for the act, allowing for immediate implementation of its provisions.
• Enforcement and Penalties: Describes the consequences for social media services that violate the provisions regarding minors, including potential legal actions by parents.
• Paid Leave Recommendations: Mandates the secretary of education to identify and report on paid leave policies for school employees related to childbirth and adoption, including stillbirth.
• Paid Leave Recommendations: The bill mandates the secretary of education to evaluate and report on paid leave policies for school employees related to childbirth and adoption.
• Parental Access to Adolescent Accounts: Establishes that parents or guardians must be provided with access credentials to monitor and manage their adolescents social media accounts.
• Prohibition on Personal Information Collection: Prohibits social media services from collecting or using personal information from adolescents, except as necessary for age verification.
• Regulations on Social Media Services for Minors: Establishes regulations that prevent social media services from allowing minors to create accounts without parental consent and imposes restrictions on the collection of personal information for age verification.
• Section 1 — Interscholastic case review panel: Amends IC 20-26-14-6 to require the state secretary of education or designee to chair a nine-member panel, with specific qualifications for members (parents of high school students, high school principals, athletic directors, and other school administrators). The secretary administers panel functions; terms are four years with staggered starts; monthly meetings are required unless no cases exist; a five-member quorum is needed; and panel decisions require a majority (or four votes) to act. The association must implement panel decisions, but these apply only to the case before the panel. The association covers panel costs, including travel and a minimum $50 per meeting stipend for members.
• Section 2 — Teacher preparation program oversight and reporting: Revises the statewide responsibilities for teacher preparation programs. The department must oversee professional instruction, accredit and review programs, approve content-area licensure programs, and specify licenses for graduates of approved programs. It requires ongoing collaboration with programs to ensure high professional standards, with reporting on program performance, attrition and completion rates, GPA-disaggregated data, licensure exam results, and broader data for public transparency. Establishes a matrix rating system for programs based on recent years’ data and outlines actions for programs not meeting standards, potentially triggering improvement plans or peer reviews. The department may approve two accreditors (besides possibly acting as an accreditor) and must partner with higher education and others for external evaluations related to reading instruction.
• Section 3 — Paid leave study for certain employee events: Adds a new section to address paid leave for employees around childbirth, adoption, and stillbirth. By December 1, 2026, the secretary of education must identify school corporations’ current paid leave offerings for specified events, determine leave lengths, and make recommendations, submitting findings to the General Assembly. The section expires July 1, 2027.
• Section 4 — Civic literacy metrics: Creates a new requirement for the secretary of education to identify key metrics and activities to measure civic literacy and engagement across K-12 and postsecondary education, and to report these metrics to the General Assembly.
• Social Media Regulations for Minors: The bill establishes restrictions on social media services regarding the creation of accounts for minors, requiring parental consent for adolescents and prohibiting accounts for children.
• Voidance of Existing Regulation: Declares a specific existing administrative code provision void, effective immediately, and sets an expiration for this action.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• House - 2048 - Relating To Personal Data Processing Practices For Companies, And Making Civil Penalties Applicable.
• House - 2082 - Relating To Restrictions On The Use Of Artificial Intelligence, And Creating A Civil Cause Of Action.
• House - 2153 - Requiring Community Colleges, School Districts, And Institutions Under The Control Of The State Board Of Regents To Adopt Policies Related To The Use Of Artificial Intelligence By Students And Employees.
• House - 610 - Relating To Computer Science Education, Including High School Curricula And Graduation Requirements, Practitioner Preparation Programs, And College Admissions, And Including Applicability Provisions.
• Senate - 2094 - Relating To Computer Science And Artificial Intelligence Education, Including High School Curricula And Graduation Requirements, Practitioner Preparation Programs, And College Admissions, And Including Applicability Provisions.
• Senate - 3011 - Establishing Requirements And Guidelines For Chatbots, Making Appropriations, And Providing Civil Penalties.
• Senate - 3013 - Relating To The Ownership Of Artificial Intelligence Output And Trained Artificial Intelligence.
• Senate - 3014 - Relating To The Use Of Artificial Intelligence Systems And Related Software By State Agencies For Employment And Other Purposes.

Summary

House File 2048 introduces regulations concerning the processing of personal data by companies operating in Iowa. It defines key terms related to personal data and outlines the responsibilities of companies, including disclosure requirements, consent protocols, and individual rights regarding personal data. The bill also establishes enforcement mechanisms, including penalties for violations and the ability for individuals to seek damages. Exemptions are provided for specific types of data processing, such as for law enforcement and national security purposes.

Key Sections

• Company requirements: Companies must disclose their data processing practices to individuals clearly and obtain consent before processing personal data. They must also implement security measures and allow individuals to revoke consent.
• Conforming changes: Amends existing law to include violations of this chapter as unlawful practices.
• Definitions: This section defines key terms related to personal data processing, including automated decision making, company, personal data, and process.
• Enforcement — penalties: This section grants the attorney general enforcement authority and outlines penalties for violations of the bill, including the possibility of civil penalties and private actions by residents.
• Exemptions: Certain data processing activities are exempt from the bills requirements, including those related to law enforcement, national security, and de-identified data.
• Personal data processing — individual rights: Residents have rights regarding their personal data, including confirmation of data processing, access to their data, correction of inaccuracies, deletion requests, and the ability to revoke consent.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House File 2082 outlines definitions and regulations regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in recreating an individuals likeness without consent. The bill specifies the types of uses that require consent, such as in commercial activities or political campaigns, and establishes a framework for civil liability, including potential damages and class action provisions for violations.

Key Sections

• Civil liability — damages — additional remedies: This section establishes the legal recourse available for violations of the chapter, including the ability to seek actual and punitive damages, attorney fees, and class action suits.
• Definitions: This section defines artificial intelligence as any machine-based system that generates outputs based on inputs, which can influence environments.
• Rights to likeness: This section prohibits the use of AI to recreate an individuals likeness without their consent in certain contexts, including commercial use and political campaigns.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House File 2153 mandates that community colleges, school districts, and state universities develop and publish policies regarding the use of artificial intelligence by students and employees. These policies must clarify when AI can be used in educational settings and outline any prohibitions. The bill includes specific deadlines for the adoption of these policies and requires them to be accessible via the institutions websites.

Key Sections

• Policies for Community Colleges: Community colleges must adopt and publish policies regarding the use of artificial intelligence by students and staff by July 1, 2028.
• Policies for Higher Education Institutions: Institutions of higher education under the state board of regents must create and publish AI usage policies similar to those required for community colleges.
• Policies for School Districts: School districts are required to adopt and publish AI usage policies for students and employees by July 1, 2028.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House Study Bill 610 introduces measures to integrate computer science into high school curricula and graduation requirements in Iowa. Starting with the graduating class of 2030-2031, students will be required to complete one semester of computer science. The bill also mandates the development of high-quality standards for computer science education across all grades, the creation of a list of approved computer science courses, and a plan to increase the capacity of computer science teachers. Additionally, it outlines how computer science courses can fulfill science and mathematics requirements for college admissions.

Key Sections

• Annual Reporting Requirements: Mandates annual reporting by school districts on computer science and AI courses and teacher qualifications.
• Applicability to Practitioner Preparation Programs: The bill includes requirements for students admitted to practitioner preparation programs after July 1, 2028, to have preparation in computer science and artificial intelligence.
• Computer Science in College Admissions: The bill ensures that computer science courses can count towards science and mathematics requirements for college admissions in Iowa.
• Computer Science Standards and Instruction: The bill mandates high-quality standards for computer science education across all grade levels, including instruction on AI and its societal impacts.
• Course List Publication: Requires the publication of a list of approved computer science and AI courses by June 30, 2027, for use in fulfilling graduation requirements.
• Establishment of High-Quality Standards: The bill establishes standards for computer science education at all school levels to ensure high-quality instruction on fundamental concepts and ethical considerations of technology and artificial intelligence.
• Establishment of Standards: Establishes high-quality standards for teaching computer science and artificial intelligence in K-12 education, ensuring all levels include foundational concepts.
• Expansion of Teacher Capacity: The bill requires the creation of a plan to enhance the capacity of computer science teachers in Iowa, focusing on schools with fewer than 500 students, by June 30, 2027.
• Graduation Requirements for Computer Science: Beginning with the 2030-2031 school year graduating class, high school students must complete one semester of computer science as a condition for graduation.
• Higher Education Admission Requirements: Changes to the regent admission index to accept computer science courses as equivalent to science or math for admission purposes.
• High School Graduation Requirements: Amends high school graduation requirements to include at least one semester of computer science and artificial intelligence starting with the class of 2030-2031.
• High School Graduation Requirements: The bill amends graduation requirements to include one semester of computer science for students graduating in the 2030-2031 school year and beyond.
• Professional Development for Teachers: Modifies provisions to allow tuition reimbursement for teachers under initial licenses seeking computer science endorsements.
• Publication of Approved Courses: The bill mandates the Iowa Department of Education to publish a list of computer science courses that meet state standards for graduation requirements by June 30, 2027.
• Reporting and Transparency: School districts must report annually on computer science courses, teachers, and student participation, with information published by the Department of Education.
• State Mandate Funding: The state cost for compliance with mandates in this Act will be paid from state school foundation aid and computer science professional development grants.
• Statewide Instruction Plan: Mandates the development of a statewide plan for K-12 computer science and AI instruction by July 1, 2022.
• Teacher Capacity Expansion: Calls for a plan to expand the capacity of computer science and AI teachers by June 30, 2027, with specific support for smaller schools.
• Tuition Reimbursement for Teachers: School districts and accredited nonpublic schools can apply for funds to provide tuition reimbursement for Iowa teachers seeking endorsements in computer science.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House Study Bill 610 proposes amendments to existing education codes to require high school students to complete a semester of computer science as part of their graduation requirements starting with the class of 2030-2031. It also sets standards for computer science education across all grade levels, mandates the publication of approved computer science courses, and outlines the necessary steps for expanding teacher capacity in this field. Additionally, it addresses the inclusion of computer science courses in college admissions criteria and provides for the potential waiver of graduation requirements in certain circumstances.

Key Sections

• Annual Reporting Requirements: Mandates annual reporting by school districts on computer science course offerings and teacher qualifications.
• Computer Science in College Admissions: Amends college admission rules to accept computer science courses as equivalent to science or mathematics units.
• Course List Publication: Requires the Department of Education to publish a list of approved computer science and artificial intelligence courses by June 30, 2027.
• Expansion of Computer Science Teacher Capacity: Requires the creation of a plan to expand the capacity of computer science teachers, with input from various stakeholders.
• High-Quality Standards for Computer Science Education: Establishes high-quality standards for computer science education across all grade levels, emphasizing fundamental concepts including artificial intelligence.
• High-Quality Standards for Education: Establishes high-quality standards for computer science and artificial intelligence education across all grade levels.
• High School Graduation Requirements: Amends graduation requirements to include one semester of computer science for students graduating from high school starting with the 2030-2031 class.
• High School Graduation Requirements: Amends high school graduation requirements to include one semester of computer science and artificial intelligence starting with the 2030-2031 graduating class.
• Implementation Timeline: Sets a timeline for incorporating computer science and artificial intelligence instruction starting from the 2023 school year.
• Nonresident Pupils: Allows for agreements between school districts to provide access to computer science courses not offered in a students home district.
• Practitioner Preparation Programs: Integrates computer science and artificial intelligence preparation into teacher training programs.
• Publication of Computer Science Courses: Mandates the Department of Education to publish a list of approved computer science courses by June 30, 2027.
• Statewide Instruction Plan: Mandates the development and implementation of a statewide computer science and artificial intelligence instruction plan by July 1, 2022.
• Teacher Capacity Expansion Plan: Requires the creation of a plan to expand computer science teacher capacity by June 30, 2027.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill introduces a framework for defining and regulating chatbots within the state of Iowa. It sets forth specific requirements for chatbot functionality, including transparency about their nature as non-human entities and limitations regarding the advice they can provide. The bill also outlines civil penalties for violations of these regulations and empowers the attorney general to enforce compliance and implement rules.

Key Sections

• Chatbots — Required Practices: This section establishes the legal responsibilities for designing and deploying chatbots, particularly regarding user safety and transparency.
• Definitions: This section defines what constitutes a chatbot and outlines exceptions for certain interactive services that do not meet the criteria for a chatbot.
• Penalties: This section outlines the penalties for violating the regulations set forth in the previous section, including fines and enforcement authority.
• Rulemaking Authority: This section grants the attorney general the authority to adopt rules necessary for implementing the regulations established in this bill.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill addresses the ownership of artificial intelligence output and trained artificial intelligence. It defines key terms such as artificial intelligence, input, output, train, and user. It stipulates that users who provide input to AI own the output generated, provided it does not infringe on third-party rights. Additionally, it states that individuals who train AI own the resulting AI if they have lawfully acquired the training data and have not transferred ownership. It also clarifies that if AI is used in an employment context, the output belongs to the employer under certain conditions. The bill ensures that ownership rights do not infringe on existing intellectual property rights.

Key Sections

• Definitions: This section provides definitions for key terms used throughout the bill including artificial intelligence, input, output, train, and user.
• Employment Context: This provision clarifies that if AI is used during employment, the output or trained AI belongs to the employer under specified conditions.
• Infringement Clause: This section states that ownership rights granted by the bill do not apply if they would infringe on existing copyrights or intellectual property rights.
• Ownership of Output: This provision establishes that a user who provides input to an AI owns the output generated by that AI, as long as it does not infringe on third-party copyrights or intellectual property.
• Ownership of Trained AI: This provision states that a person who trains an AI owns the resulting AI if the training data was lawfully acquired and they have not transferred ownership.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill establishes guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence systems and related software by state agencies in Iowa. It mandates the creation of an inventory of such systems, outlines requirements for automated employment decision-making tools, and prohibits certain uses of AI that could affect employee rights or benefits. The bill emphasizes accountability and transparency in the deployment of AI technologies within state agencies.

Key Sections

• Artificial Intelligence Systems — Prohibited Uses: This provision prohibits state agencies from using AI systems in ways that affect employee rights, benefits, or privileges, including collective bargaining rights.
• Definitions: This section defines key terms related to artificial intelligence systems, including what constitutes an AI system and automated employment decision-making tools.
• Disclosure of Automated Employment Decision-Making Tools: State agencies using automated employment decision-making tools must publish a list of these tools and submit an annual report on their usage.
• Inventory of Artificial Intelligence Systems: This provision requires the Department of Management to maintain an inventory of AI systems used by state agencies, detailing their purposes and uses.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• House - 2183 - Modifying Elements In The Crimes Of Sexual Exploitation Of A Child, Unlawful Transmission Of A Visual Depiction Of A Child And Breach Of Privacy To Prohibit Certain Acts Related To Visual Depictions In Which The Person Depicted Is Indistinguishable From A Real Child, Morphed From A Real Childs Image Or Generated Without Any Actual Child Involvement, Provide An Exception For Cable Services In The Crime Of Breach Of Privacy And Prohibit Dissemination Of Certain Items That Appear To Depict Or Purport To Depict An Identifiable Person.

Summary

House Bill No. 2183 amends existing laws related to crimes against children, particularly focusing on sexual exploitation and privacy breaches involving visual depictions. The bill expands the definitions of visual depictions to encompass images created or modified by artificial intelligence, thereby addressing modern technological concerns. It modifies elements of existing crimes, introduces new prohibitions related to visual depictions, and includes exceptions for specific situations, such as those involving cable services.

Key Sections

• Amendment of Sexual Exploitation of a Child Law: This provision modifies the existing definition of sexual exploitation of a child to include visual depictions that are artificially generated or altered, expanding the scope of the law to cover new technological realities.
• Amendments to Sexual Exploitation of a Child: This provision amends the definition and penalties associated with the sexual exploitation of a child, including the possession of artificially generated visual depictions.
• Application of Constitutional Rights: This provision emphasizes that in cases involving state agencies, courts must apply statutory construction rules while ensuring that interpretations align with individuals fundamental constitutional rights.
• Breach of Privacy: Amends the definition of breach of privacy to include the unauthorized dissemination of visual depictions altered by AI or digital means.
• Breach of Privacy: This provision modifies the breach of privacy laws to include new forms of visual depiction and establishes penalties for violations.
• Breach of Privacy: This provision outlines actions that constitute a breach of privacy, including unauthorized interception of communications and the use of recording devices in private settings.
• Breach of Privacy Amendments: This provision updates the breach of privacy laws to include new definitions and penalties for unauthorized recording and dissemination of visual depictions of identifiable persons.
• Definitions: This section clarifies the definitions of rule and regulation and state agency as per existing law.
• Interpretation of Statutes and Regulations: This section states that when interpreting state statutes, rules, and regulations, courts and hearing officers may consider agency interpretations but are not bound to defer to them, and must interpret the law independently.
• Section 1: When interpreting a state statute, rule, regulation, or document with the force of law, a state court or an administrative hearing officer shall consider but not defer to the states agency interpretation and shall interpret the statute, rule, regulation, or document de novo.
• Section 2: This act takes effect and is in force from and after its publication in the statute book.
• Sexual Exploitation of a Child: Defines sexual exploitation of a child to include possession of visual depictions that are artificially generated or altered, regardless of actual child involvement.
• Sexual Exploitation of a Child: This provision defines sexual exploitation of a child, outlining various actions that constitute this crime, including using a child for sexually explicit conduct and possessing visual depictions of such conduct.
• Unlawful Transmission of a Visual Depiction of a Child: Defines unlawful transmission of visual depictions of minors and establishes penalties for such actions, especially when the offender is under 19 years of age.
• Unlawful Transmission of a Visual Depiction of a Child: This provision addresses the unlawful transmission of visual depictions of children in states of nudity, specifying the conditions under which this crime occurs and the penalties associated.
• Unlawful Transmission of Visual Depictions: This provision outlines the crime of unlawfully transmitting visual depictions of minors, specifying the criteria for aggravated offenses and the corresponding penalties.
• Unlawful Transmission of Visual Depictions: This provision outlines the crime of unlawful transmission of visual depictions of minors, including the penalties for aggravated offenses.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• House - 201 - An Act Relating To The Use Of Algorithmic Devices In Setting The Amount Of Rent To Be Charged To A Residential Tenant.
• House - 227 - An Act Relating To Addictive Online Platforms.
• House - 33 - An Act Relating To Data Privacy.
• House - 375 - An Act Relating To Automated License Plate Readers.

Summary

The bill establishes a new section in Kentucky law that defines algorithmic devices and prohibits their use by landlords in determining rent amounts. It emphasizes that such practices may violate antitrust laws and outlines the consequences for landlords who engage in these practices, deeming them unfair and deceptive. The bill also empowers the Attorney General to enforce these provisions under existing consumer protection laws.

Key Sections

• Application of the Act: This provision clarifies that the act applies to rental agreements executed after the effective date of the act.
• Definition of Algorithmic Device: This provision defines what constitutes an algorithmic device and specifies exclusions.
• Prohibition on Use: This provision prohibits landlords from using algorithmic devices to set rent amounts for tenants.
• Violations and Penalties: This provision outlines the consequences of violating the prohibition against algorithmic devices.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill outlines the requirements for parental consent when children create accounts on covered AI companion or social media platforms. It includes provisions for resolving disputes regarding a childs age, invalidation of contracts made without proper consent, and the establishment of penalties for violations of these provisions. The bill also empowers the Attorney General to enforce these regulations and provides mechanisms for civil action against non-compliant platforms.

Key Sections

• Civil Penalties for Violations: Platforms that recklessly or intentionally violate the act face civil penalties of $10,000 or actual damages, whichever is greater.
• Enforcement by the Attorney General: The Attorney General can enforce the act, investigate violations, and may impose penalties for continued non-compliance after a cure period.
• Invalid Contracts with Minors: Contracts made by children without sufficient parental consent are deemed invalid and unenforceable, including any arbitration clauses or limitations of liability.
• Parental Consent and Age Verification: This section mandates that covered platforms obtain verifiable parental consent before allowing children to create accounts. It also outlines the process for age verification if an account holder disputes their classification as a child.
• Private Right of Action: Children or parents can sue for damages or seek injunctive relief for violations of the act, including mental health damages and attorney fees.
• Severability and Public Policy: Any waivers or limitations of rights established by the act are void and unenforceable, ensuring that the acts provisions are upheld.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This bill amends KRS 367.3611 to 367.3629, introducing definitions related to data privacy, including terms like personal data, controller, processor, and sensitive data. It outlines the responsibilities of data controllers in handling personal data, ensuring consumer rights are respected, and preventing practices like surveillance pricing. The amendments are set to take effect on January 1, 2026.

Key Sections

• Controller Responsibilities: This provision outlines the obligations of data controllers, including limitations on data collection, requirements for data security, and prohibitions against unlawful discrimination and surveillance pricing.
• Definitions: This section provides definitions for key terms used throughout the bill, including personal data, controller, processor, sensitive data, and others, to clarify the scope and application of the data privacy regulations.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

This legislation creates a new section in KRS Chapter 189 that defines Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR) and outlines strict prohibitions against their use. It establishes criminal penalties for violations, categorizing the use of ALPR systems as a Class D felony, and allows individuals recorded by these systems to seek civil damages.

Key Sections

• Attorneys Fees: Details the conditions under which plaintiffs and defendants may recover attorneys fees in civil actions related to ALPR violations.
• Civil Liability: Outlines the civil liabilities for individuals or entities that use ALPR systems, allowing those recorded to sue for damages.
• Criminal Penalties: Establishes that using, deploying, or maintaining an ALPR system is a Class D felony, punishable by a $10,000 fine.
• Definition of Automated License Plate Reader: Defines what constitutes an Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) as a system using cameras and algorithms to read license plates.
• Prohibition on ALPR Systems: Prohibits any person, entity, or government agency from using, deploying, or maintaining an ALPR.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• House - 1451 - An Act To Regulate And Prevent Childrens Access To Artificial Intelligence Chatbots With Human-Like Features And Social Artificial Intelligence Companions

Summary

This legislation prohibits the accessibility of artificial intelligence chatbots and social AI companions that exhibit human-like features to minors. It defines what constitutes human-like features and outlines specific requirements for deployers to prevent minors from accessing such technologies. The bill allows exceptions for therapy chatbots under strict conditions, mandates safeguards for user information, and establishes penalties for violations.

Key Sections

• Additional protections; all users: This section mandates that deployers implement practices to protect all users, including emergency situation protocols and restrictions on user information collection.
• Applicability: This section outlines the applicability of the chapter, specifying that it applies to deployers operating in Maine and to users, particularly minors, residing in the state.
• Chatbots with human-like features and social AI companions not accessible to minors: This provision mandates that deployers ensure that chatbots with human-like features and social AI companions are not accessible to minors, requiring age verification and allowing for alternative versions without such features.
• Definitions: This section defines key terms used throughout the chapter, including artificial intelligence chatbot, deployer, human-like feature, minor, and others.
• Exemption for therapy chatbots: This section provides conditions under which therapy chatbots may be made available to minors, requiring oversight by licensed mental health professionals and adherence to specific safeguards.
• Penalties and remedies for violation: This provision outlines the enforcement mechanisms for violations of the chapter, including civil actions by the Attorney General and private rights of action for minors.
• Rules: This section allows the Department of the Attorney General to adopt rules necessary for the implementation of the chapter.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• House - 145 - Election Law - Election Misinformation, Election Disinformation, And Deepfakes
• House - 148 - Consumer Protection And Labor And Employment - Surveillance-Based Price And Wage Setting - Prohibition
• House - 184 - Criminal Law - Identity Fraud - Artificial Intelligence And Deepfake Representations
• House - 314 - Automation Technology Deployment Assessment And Displaced Employee Retraining Fund - Established
• House - 434 - Residential Leases - Use Of Algorithmic Device By Landlord To Determine Rent, Occupancy, And Lease Terms - Prohibition
• House - 9 - 3-1-1 Systems - Expansion Program And Oversight Board - Establishment
• Senate - 114 - 3-1-1 Systems - Expansion Program And Oversight Board - Establishment
• Senate - 141 - Election Law - Election Misinformation, Election Disinformation, And Deepfakes
• Senate - 8 - Criminal Law - Identity Fraud - Artificial Intelligence And Deepfake Representations

Summary

House Bill 145 seeks to empower the State Administrator of Elections to act against election misinformation and disinformation, including the use of deepfakes. It mandates the State Board of Elections to maintain a reporting portal for the public and allows for civil actions against entities disseminating false information. The bill also prohibits the use of deepfakes to mislead voters and establishes penalties for violations.

Key Sections

• Actions by the State Administrator: If a credible report of misinformation or disinformation is received, the State Administrator must correct the information, may seek injunctions for removal, and can issue subpoenas for related records.
• Actions by the State Administrator: The State Administrator must take action upon receiving credible reports of misinformation or disinformation, including public corrections and potential legal actions.
• Civil Actions by the State Board: The State Board can file civil actions against entities that publish misinformation, seeking damages and costs associated with correcting the misinformation.
• Civil Actions by the State Board: The State Board may file civil actions against entities that publish misinformation, seeking damages and costs incurred in correcting the misinformation.
• Definition and Regulation of Deepfakes: This provision defines deepfake and outlines the circumstances under which the use of deepfakes is prohibited, particularly in relation to misleading voters.
• Definition and Regulation of Deepfakes: This section defines deepfake and outlines the conditions under which the use of deepfakes is prohibited in the electoral context, including penalties for violations.
• Definitions of Misinformation and Disinformation: This provision defines election misinformation and election disinformation, clarifying the differences between incorrect information and intentionally misleading information regarding elections.
• Definitions of Misinformation and Disinformation: This section defines election misinformation and election disinformation, establishing the criteria for what constitutes misleading information related to elections.
• Exemptions from Deepfake Regulations: Certain exemptions are provided for deepfakes used in satire, news broadcasts, and other specified contexts, clarifying when the regulations do not apply.
• Penalties for Violations: Individuals who violate the deepfake prohibition are subject to misdemeanor charges, with potential fines and imprisonment.
• State Board Responsibilities: The State Board of Elections is required to maintain a public portal for reporting misinformation and conduct periodic reviews of reported material, issuing corrections or referrals as necessary.
• State Board Responsibilities: The State Board of Elections is required to maintain a reporting portal for election misinformation and disinformation, review submissions, and issue corrective information or refer cases to the State Prosecutor.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House Bill 148 establishes regulations against the use of surveillance data for setting prices and wages. It defines surveillance-based price setting and wage setting, outlines exceptions for certain pricing practices, and establishes penalties for violations under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act. The bill aims to ensure fair practices in pricing and employment compensation by restricting the use of personal data obtained through surveillance.

Key Sections

• Definitions and Exceptions: This provision outlines definitions related to automated decision systems and surveillance data, and specifies exceptions where customized pricing or wages may be allowed.
• Definitions and Scope: This provision defines key terms such as surveillance-based price setting, surveillance data, and automated decision system to clarify the scope of the bill.
• Prohibition of Surveillance-Based Price Setting: This provision prohibits individuals from engaging in surveillance-based price setting, which involves using surveillance data to customize prices for goods or services.
• Prohibition of Surveillance-Based Wage Setting: This provision prohibits employers from using surveillance data to determine or inform customized wages for employees.
• Surveillance-Based Price Setting Prohibition: This provision prohibits the use of surveillance data in conjunction with automated decision systems to set customized prices for goods or services.
• Surveillance-Based Wage Setting Prohibition: This provision prohibits employers from using surveillance data alongside automated decision systems to determine customized wages for employees.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House Bill 184 seeks to enhance protections against identity fraud by prohibiting the unauthorized use of personal identifying information and the malicious use of artificial intelligence or deepfake technologies to harm individuals. The bill outlines various forms of identity fraud and establishes penalties for violations, while also allowing victims to pursue civil actions against perpetrators. It defines key terms related to identity fraud and sets forth requirements for prosecution and civil recourse.

Key Sections

• Civil Actions: Victims of identity fraud can bring civil actions against perpetrators, allowing courts to issue injunctions and other appropriate relief.
• Civil Actions for Victims: Victims of identity fraud or deepfake misuse are granted the right to bring civil actions against those who commit these offenses.
• Definitions: This section provides definitions for key terms related to the bill, including artificial intelligence, deepfake representation, and harm.
• Definitions: This section provides definitions for key terms used in the bill, including artificial intelligence, deepfake representation, harm, and personal identifying information.
• Penalties for Violations: This provision outlines the penalties for various offenses related to identity fraud, including felonies and misdemeanors based on the value of the fraud.
• Penalties for Violations: This section outlines the criminal penalties for violating the provisions of the bill, including classifications of felonies and misdemeanors based on the value of the benefits obtained through identity fraud.
• Prohibitions on Identity Fraud: The bill prohibits individuals from knowingly using personal identifying information without consent to cause harm, as well as from using deepfake technology to impersonate others.
• Prohibitions on Identity Fraud: This provision prohibits individuals from knowingly obtaining or using personal identifying information without consent for fraudulent purposes, including causing harm or obtaining benefits.
• Use of Deepfake Representations: This section specifically prohibits the use of artificial intelligence and deepfake technologies to impersonate others or create false records with harmful intent.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House Bill 314 requires certain employers that deploy automation technology to report employee counts and displaced employees to the Secretary of Labor, and to pay an assessment for each displaced employee. The bill establishes the Displaced Employee Retraining Fund to support retraining programs for individuals affected by automation technology, ensuring they have access to training and job placement services.

Key Sections

• 11–1802: Covered employers are required to submit annual reports detailing employee counts and automation technology used, along with the number of displaced employees.
• 11–1803: This section outlines the financial assessment for covered employers based on the number of displaced employees.
• 11–1804: This section establishes penalties for failing to comply with reporting and payment requirements.
• 11–1805: This section establishes the Displaced Employee Retraining Fund to support retraining for displaced employees.
• 11–1806: The Secretary of Labor is required to report annually on the status of employers and displaced employees.
• 11–1807: This section mandates the Secretary to verify employer compliance and adopt regulations to implement the subtitle.
• Annual Reporting Requirements: Mandates annual reporting by the Secretary of Labor on the impact of the bill and the status of displaced employees.
• Assessment Payment: Establishes the requirement for covered employers to pay an assessment for each displaced employee, with provisions for reducing the payment under certain conditions.
• Civil Penalties: Outlines civil penalties for covered employers who fail to comply with reporting and payment requirements.
• Displaced Employee Retraining Fund: Establishes a fund to support retraining for individuals displaced by automation technology, detailing its administration and funding sources.
• Regulatory Authority: Grants the Secretary of Labor authority to verify compliance and adopt necessary regulations to implement the subtitle.
• Subtitle 18. Automation Technology Deployment Assessment: Defines key terms related to automation technology and establishes the criteria for covered employers who must report on employee displacement.
• Subtitle 18. Automation Technology Deployment Assessment: This section defines key terms related to automation technology and the responsibilities of covered employers regarding employee displacement.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House Bill 434 introduces a prohibition against landlords utilizing algorithmic devices that rely on nonpublic competitor data for setting rent prices and lease terms. This legislation is designed to protect tenants from potentially unfair practices that could arise from the use of such technology. Violations of this act would be classified as unfair, abusive, or deceptive trade practices under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act.

Key Sections

• Definitions and Scope: This section defines key terms related to algorithmic devices and sets the scope of the prohibition against their use by landlords.
• Effective Date and Applicability: The act will take effect on October 1, 2026, and will only apply to rental agreements executed after this date.
• Prohibition on Use of Algorithmic Devices: Landlords are prohibited from employing algorithmic devices that utilize nonpublic competitor data to set rental prices, occupancy levels, or lease terms.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

House Bill 9 aims to create the Maryland 3–1–1 Oversight Board and a 3–1–1 Program that incorporates artificial intelligence technology to enhance the efficiency of nonemergency services. The bill mandates the implementation of these systems across all counties by a specified date, ensuring that residents have access to streamlined information and services through modern technology.

Key Sections

• Definitions of Artificial Intelligence: Reiterates the definition of artificial intelligence as per the State Finance and Procurement Article, emphasizing its predictive and decision-making capabilities.
• Duties of the Board: Outlines the duties and responsibilities of the Maryland 3–1–1 Oversight Board, including program implementation and evaluation.
• Duties of the Board: Outlines the duties of the Board, including designating counties for the program, establishing evaluation criteria, and ensuring alignment with best practices.
• Establishment of the 3–1–1 Program: Mandates the establishment of a 3–1–1 Program aimed at evaluating and expanding 3–1–1 systems in Maryland, including the use of chatbots and voicebots.
• Establishment of the 3–1–1 Program: The Board is tasked with establishing a 3–1–1 Program to evaluate and expand the use of 3–1–1 systems in Maryland, including the requirement for technology vendors.
• Implementation Timeline and Features: Sets timelines for establishing chatbots and voicebots in designated counties, detailing features such as multilingual support and integration with geographic data.
• Maryland 3–1–1 Oversight Board: Establishes the Maryland 3–1–1 Oversight Board, its composition, and responsibilities, including appointing members from various sectors and ensuring the board meets regularly.
• Maryland 3–1–1 Oversight Board: Establishes the Maryland 3–1–1 Oversight Board, its composition, and responsibilities including the appointment of members and operational guidelines.
• Reporting Requirements: Details the reporting requirements for the Board to assess the progress and effectiveness of the 3–1–1 Program and its components.
• Reporting Requirements: Mandates the Board to submit progress reports on the programs implementation and effectiveness, including user satisfaction and cost evaluations.
• Subtitle 3A. 3–1–1 Nonemergency Community Information and Referral Systems: Defines key terms related to the 3–1–1 systems, including artificial intelligence, chatbot, voicebot, and 3–1–1 system.
• Subtitle 3A. 3–1–1 Nonemergency Community Information and Referral Systems: Defines terms related to the 3–1–1 system such as artificial intelligence, chatbot, voicebot, and establishes the Maryland 3–1–1 Oversight Board.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

Senate Bill 114 proposes the creation of a Maryland 3-1-1 Oversight Board to oversee the implementation and expansion of a 3-1-1 Program. This program will utilize artificial intelligence, including chatbots and voicebots, to provide community information and route calls efficiently. The bill mandates the expansion of the 3-1-1 system to all counties by a specific deadline and outlines the roles and responsibilities of the Oversight Board, including evaluating vendor proposals and ensuring adherence to best practices.

Key Sections

• Establishment of the 3–1–1 Program: Mandates the establishment of a 3-1-1 Program to evaluate and expand 3-1-1 systems in Maryland, including the integration of chatbots and voicebots.
• Maryland 3–1–1 Oversight Board: Establishes the Maryland 3-1-1 Oversight Board, detailing its composition, meeting requirements, and responsibilities.
• Reporting Requirements: Sets forth reporting requirements for the Oversight Board, including progress reports on the implementation and effectiveness of the 3-1-1 Program.
• Responsibilities of the Board: Outlines the responsibilities of the Oversight Board, including designating counties for the program, establishing evaluation criteria, and ensuring alignment with best practices.
• Subtitle 3A. 3–1–1 Nonemergency Community Information and Referral Systems: Defines key terms related to the 3-1-1 Program, including artificial intelligence, chatbot, voicebot, and 3-1-1 system.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

Senate Bill 141 establishes measures to combat election misinformation and disinformation, including the requirement for the State Administrator of Elections to act upon credible reports of such misinformation. It authorizes the State Board of Elections to pursue civil actions against entities that disseminate false information and prohibits the use of deepfakes to mislead voters. The bill outlines definitions, procedures for reporting misinformation, and penalties for violations.

Key Sections

• Actions by State Administrator: Outlines the actions the State Administrator must take upon receiving credible reports of election misinformation or disinformation.
• Civil Actions by State Board: Authorizes the State Board to file civil actions against entities that spread election misinformation or disinformation.
• Civil Actions by State Board: The State Board may file civil actions against entities that publish false information and seek damages for costs incurred in correcting such misinformation.
• Deepfake Regulations: This section defines deepfake and establishes legal restrictions on the use of deepfakes to disseminate false information that could influence voters.
• Definitions of Misinformation and Disinformation: This section defines election misinformation and election disinformation and establishes a portal for reporting such information.
• Definitions of Misinformation and Disinformation: This section defines election misinformation and election disinformation, clarifying the nature of misleading information related to elections.
• Penalties for Violations: Individuals who violate the deepfake regulations are subject to criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment.
• Regulations on Deepfakes: Defines deepfakes and prohibits their use to disseminate materially false information related to elections.
• State Administrators Actions: The State Administrator must act upon credible reports of election misinformation or disinformation by providing accurate information and may seek legal remedies against those responsible.
• State Board Responsibilities: The State Board of Elections is required to maintain a reporting portal for election misinformation and disinformation and to take corrective actions when credible reports are received.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Summary

Senate Bill 8 seeks to enhance protections against identity fraud by prohibiting the unauthorized use of personal identifying information and the malicious use of artificial intelligence or deepfake representations. It outlines civil actions for victims and stipulates penalties for violators, thereby aiming to safeguard individuals from harm caused by identity theft and fraudulent representations.

Key Sections

• Civil Action for Victims: Victims of identity fraud may bring a civil action against perpetrators, allowing for injunctions and other reliefs.
• Civil Action for Victims: Victims of violations of the bill may bring a civil action against offenders, and the court may provide various forms of relief.
• Criminal Penalties: This section outlines the penalties for various violations of identity fraud laws based on the value of the benefit obtained and the number of victims involved.
• Definitions: This section defines key terms related to identity fraud, including artificial intelligence, deepfake representation, harm, and personal identifying information.
• Definitions: This section provides definitions for key terms used in the bill, including artificial intelligence, deepfake representation, and harm.
• Enforcement Authority: This section grants law enforcement agencies the authority to investigate and enforce violations of identity fraud laws without jurisdictional limitations.
• Penalties: This section outlines the penalties for violating the provisions of the bill, including fines and imprisonment based on the severity of the violation and the value of the benefit obtained.
• Prohibited Actions: The bill prohibits individuals from knowingly using personal identifying information without consent to cause harm, as well as using AI or deepfake representations for fraudulent purposes.
• Prohibited Actions: The bill prohibits individuals from using another persons personal identifying information without consent to cause harm, and from using deepfake technology to impersonate others for fraudulent purposes.
• Restitution: The court may order restitution for victims to cover costs related to clearing their credit and health records resulting from identity fraud.

Key Requirements

Sponsors

Legislative Actions

Detailed Analysis

Index of Bills

• House - 4616 - An Act Improving The Health Insurance Prior Authorization Process
• House - 4746 - An Act Establishing The Massachusetts Consumer Data Privacy Act
• House - 83 - An Act Establishing A Special Legislative Commission To Study Load Growth Due To Ai And Data Centers
• Senate - 2630 - Promoting Economic Development With Emerging Artificial Intelligence Models And Safety
• Senate - 2631 - To Protect Against Election Misinformation
• Senate - 2632 - Relative To The Use Of Artificial Intelligence And Other Software Tools In Healthcare Decision-Making

Summary

This bill amends various provisions of the Massachusetts General Laws to establish clear requirements for health insurance carriers regarding prior authorization processes. It mandates that insurers publicly disclose items and services requiring prior authorization, report data on authorization requests, and ensure that decisions are based on evidence-based criteria. Additionally, it sets guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence in utilization reviews and protects patients from retrospective denials of previously authorized services.

Key Sections

• Annual Reporting Requirements: Carriers and utilization management organizations must report annually on the approval and denial rates of prior authorization requests, including various metrics related to the processing of these requests.
• Implementation of Automation in Prior Authorizations: Carriers must implement automated systems for processing prior authorization requests, facilitating communication between providers and insurers.
• Payment for Medically Necessary Services: Carriers must pay for services ordered by healthcare providers if they are covered benefits and meet clinical review criteria, with limitations on denying claims based on administrative errors.
• Public Disclosure of Prior Authorization Requirements: Carriers must provide a searchable list of items, services, and medications requiring prior authorization on their websites, and cannot request prior authorization for items not listed.
• Regulations on Artificial Intelligence in Utilization Review: Strict guidelines govern the use of artificial intelligence in utilization management, ensuring it does not replace provider decision-making or discriminate against patients.
• Restrictions on Retrospective Denials: Carriers cannot retrospectively deny authorization for services already approved, except in cases of fraud.
• Stability of Treatment Coverage: Coverage for stable patients on prescribed treatments cannot be restricted for a specified period, ensuring continuity of care.
• Timely Responses to Authorization Requests: Carriers must respond to prior authorization requests within specified timeframes, with expedited requests requiring a response within 24 hours under certain conditions.
• Utilization Review Criteria: Utilization review criteria must be scientifically derived, evidence-based, and publicly accessible, with requirements for notifying affected individuals of any changes.

Key Requirements

Sponsors